NationReaper Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Well that's a given. He's your lapdog. Wherever his master goes, the leash goes along with it Wait i thought i was brother kanes lapdog....BK ARE YOU CHEATING ON ME WITH THE LIKES OF PENKALA by the way, i'm still good on the 100 mil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreddieMercury Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Ahahaha, for some reason the NEW logs just crack me up. Not completely in a malicious way, just the way they talk and how they try to get around "intervention". They should have kept to their word, if they said it was gonna stay 1v1, it should stayed as such and any "incidents" after that should have been taken care of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Tyga, i insist you stop. The more i read your posts the more i find myself agreeing with you.. Such an admission will no doubt bring you to the attention of the peanut gallery. Enjoy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarikmo Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Such an admission will no doubt bring you to the attention of the peanut gallery. Enjoy! No fair, I wanted to apply for the lead of the gallery, how can I beat Wickedj? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunkMonkey Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 the purpose of this thread reminds me of a 3-way break off flank attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsoxbronco1 Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 the purpose of this thread reminds me of a 3-way break off flank attack. At least a 3-way break off flank attack accomplishes something. Ok not really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batallion Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 At least a 3-way break off flank attack accomplishes something.Ok not really. You're always free to test it out with me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronMan17 Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 who is ZDP and when did we in the IAA support them? This sums it up....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The AUT Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 You're always free to test it out with me I'm sure if he did he'd break off something into your flank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 I suppose I could threaten everyone by stating, "attack our allies and we'll defend them". Where are the Ivan's and Van Hoo's to show people what real threats are Sitting over here laughing at this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medtech Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Sitting over here laughing at this thread. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NationReaper Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 This sums it up....... he was being sarcastic...he knows what is going on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafael Nadal Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Tyga officially won this topic. We can all go home now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhawk Posted December 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 who is ZDP and when did we in the IAA support them? The following quotes along with other alliances alluding to war supported such. [01:35] <Chimaera[iAA]> So, how can I say this best?[01:35] <Chimaera[iAA]> Oh, screw it, let's take the direct route, shall we? [01:35] <~Yevgeni> I'm all for it. [01:35] <Chimaera[iAA]> NEW must declare peace with the Zombie Defense Plan. Now. 01:44] <Chimaera[iAA]> So anything you say here tonight is a logical casus belli for any future war against NEW? 2:14] <~Yevgeni> Here is our official position: we demand a complete white peace. Today. Not tomorrow, not "we couldn't reach our guy". We've put up with your lies once already. This is the second and last chance. And we want reparations for Brother-Kane. [02:15] <TAN[NEW]> A white peace, is sure will be granted... any time.. [02:15] <Chimaera[iAA]> Now. [02:15] <Chimaera[iAA]> Not any time. [02:15] <Chimaera[iAA]> Now. [02:16] <Chimaera[iAA]> Message every member of NEW at war with a member of ZDP and instruct them to send peace immediately. That language with addition of a timetable and multiple alliances coming to me with warnings of war, made such an announcement necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banned Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 No, we are not seeing this all calm down. I demand that this turn into war for the sake of my amusement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Such an admission will no doubt bring you to the attention of the peanut gallery. Enjoy! i have admitted to worse... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NationReaper Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 The following quotes along with other alliances alluding to war supported such.That language with addition of a timetable and multiple alliances coming to me with warnings of war, made such an announcement necessary. It was ZDP..and IAA..and you even failed to contact IAA after the whole thing went down..you went straight to public to try and make IAA and ZDP look like the bad guys..it really backfired on you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francium Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 You lost me somewhere during the first post, what exactly is going on ?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhawk Posted December 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 It was ZDP..and IAA..and you even failed to contact IAA after the whole thing went down..you went straight to public to try and make IAA and ZDP look like the bad guys..it really backfired on you There are no bad guys in this case. I would however consider any outcome that does not result in further war a success. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yevgeni Luchenkov Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 That language with addition of a timetable and multiple alliances coming to me with warnings of war, made such an announcement necessary. A timetable, such as giving them 24 hours to think about our offer and give us a response? Oh, what monsters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 The following quotes along with other alliances alluding to war supported such.That language with addition of a timetable and multiple alliances coming to me with warnings of war, made such an announcement necessary. Seriously, what did you expect the conversation to look like? ZDP: Golly gee NEW, those additional attacks werent very neigborly of you. NEW: Shuckens Zombies, it was just a liitle hootin n hollerin. Lets have a jug o' moonshine and forget it happened. ZDP: Weeeeellll doggies... NEW has a chance. Gave their word. Then summarily stuck the knife in ZDPs back. ZDP had no knife to fight with, so they went out and rented a couple of buzzsaws and NEW suddenly is the wronged party? Nope...Doesnt work that way. FAIL/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NationReaper Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 There are no bad guys in this case. I would however consider any outcome that does not result in further war a success. It was never going to go beyond ZDP and NEW...IAA was offering peaceful support..they had no intentions of going to war i was told that right before chimaera joined the channel..this was all about bringing it to a peaceful end.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbrownso Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 mhawk, for the love of Almighty Admin, just stop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimaera Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 The following quotes along with other alliances alluding to war supported such.That language with addition of a timetable and multiple alliances coming to me with warnings of war, made such an announcement necessary. Well, I do enjoy the rather edited logs. If you would look at the part where I'm talking about CB's, I was doing so to mock NEW's supposed reason for the second attacks on Brother Kane - namely, that one of their members felt insulted by something they said. I certainly wasn't insinuating that I was going to spend all night looking for a CB against NEW. That would go against the goal of being a peaceful mediator. And yes, I was a little harsh during the negotiations - NEW spent literally all day yesterday reneging on agreements and lying to ZDP's faces, and that's simply intolerable. But saying "You must send peace now" isn't exactly saying what you think it is. You seem to be implying that I mean "send peace now, or waves of Imperials will rain hellfire down on your nations." Please, mhawk, show me where I said that. This entire thing could have been averted if you had simply queried me rather than taking the time out of your busy schedule to attempt to threaten IAA, and, in the process, make a fool of yourself in front of all of Planet Bob. There you have it, folks. This is a case of miscommunication and the misconstruing of words - and I thought that NEW was the alliance with whom we have a language barrier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 There are no bad guys in this case. I would however consider any outcome that does not result in further war a success. No bad guys? Really? Agreeing to 1v1 and then bandwagoning makes them the good guys I guess. Only in the minds of those with no minds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.