Jump to content

Banned

Members
  • Posts

    768
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Banned

  1. TO: Baron Zemo | FROM: Banned TYPE: Defeat Alert | DATE: 12/5/2020 12:00:06 AM Your nation has been defeated in battle. You do not have enough troops to defend your nation and your government has been thrown into Anarchy. You have lost all of your tanks, 44 spies, 358.53 infrastructure has been destroyed, 89.63 technology was lost and $5,000,000.00 of your money reserves was destroyed due to the invasion and resulting riots. What troops you did have deployed have also been returned home TO: Baron Zemo | FROM: Banned TYPE: Defeat Alert | DATE: 12/5/2020 12:00:03 AM Your nation has been defeated in battle. You do not have enough troops to defend your nation and your government has been thrown into Anarchy. You have lost all of your tanks, 44 spies, 358.53 infrastructure has been destroyed, 89.63 technology was lost and $5,000,000.00 of your money reserves was destroyed due to the invasion and resulting riots. What troops you did have deployed have also been returned home.
  2. *Watches WC rush into a burning building, save everyone, and then run out* Hey everyone, look at WC running from that fire!
  3. If you wanna fight Oculus, be my guest. Not our job to fight your battles for you.
  4. Exactly who would Steeldor hit in that case?
  5. You guys put up one hell of a fight when we hit you, I'll give you that. No wait, that must've been another raid. My notes on NG read "Got hit, offered peace, cried a lot."
  6. I mean, you're welcome to have allies that aren't low-hanging fruit anytime you want I guess.
  7. Considering you just give that label out every time something doesn't go your way, but somehow it never seems to apply to you and yours for doing the same stuff, it doesn't really mean much coming from you.
  8. There's a section in the document on reasons. If we are at war with you, I'm sure we might convey those reasons with you in private if we decide.
  9. I think you confused us with neutrals. I use my loot in every future raid.
  10. Leaving vague terms so you can still make them impossible to comply with? You should be specific, set the number of champions so you can't later dump some number 3x KNB's membership. And set the number of rounds so everyone knows you're not going to come back later and declare the entire thing invalid on the grounds that one champion wanted 2 rounds and the other only wanted 1. You have flip flopped so much on everything, nobody trusts you to not wiggle your way around into more torture of KNB by denying that you ever said what you said because you left an ambiguity disclaimer in an otherwise clear message.
  11. Glad to see we could agree on this. #FreeFranz
  12. Yes, yes. "We accept your surrender" *turns* "shoot the prisoners". We all saw how it went down. No point arguing semantics Kapleo. If Johnny didn't respect you enough to consult you before he accepted surrender, that doesn't sound like an LH problem. It's how he treats all his allies really, he thinks he is a puppet master, but he's just a puppet. Anyway, good war all. Gratz on peace everyone.
  13. You should have held out longer on accepting the surrender then, instead of accepting it and then backpeddling. But hey, better luck next time.
  14. Then admit your failure already then and be done with it. Johnny Apocalypse already accepted KNB's surrender, so what is your role at this point?
  15. Hey Doom Mother, it's nice to see you on here. Unless you're here to send me to my doom for acting up again. But I already apologized to you. It's just that... those kids are over there crying for nothing, I swear it. I didn't even do anything! I just said my Doom Mom could beat up their Mom, which is true. You could! I'm gonna be grounded for a long time aren't I? Well, before I go I just want to say congratulations to CLAWS on a well earned peace, and to Lucius for getting a shorter war and better terms than he deserved.
  16. Why is it that Lucius can see that he is responsible for getting TIE rolled, but you can't? And even if it was some malicious intent to get you rolled and it just got TIE rolled instead, that would only be a failure if you don't care much about TIE (which seeing the method you chose to respond to TIE getting rolled is believable). But you mistake my enjoying watching you squirm when I point out your cowardice to actually caring if you choose to be a coward or not. Frankly, I've seen the chats around KNB. If these dudes with these little nations still aren't impressed by you, then I'm certainly not either. So if you want to continue beating on KNB for the next 20 years, have at it for all I care. I'm not going to come on here and lie for you and tell the world that I masterminded whatever plot you have cooked up in your head that I must have done. I'm not going to lie for you and say that I failed, when the only things I've done is cook your friend and slip some logs to my friend who then decided to cook more of your friends. If you ever want to take a real shot though, you know my NS range. I look forward to seeing you there one day if you can find it. Until then, you'll get nothing from me.
  17. First off, as I've stated before, my providing CLAWS with valuable intel had nothing to do with burning your garbage alliance. It had everything to do with a number of treaty intelligence clauses via organizations in which I hold dual-membership, not to mention my dual-membership status in CLAWS itself. Maybe you think a member of your alliance isn't responsible for providing you intel when somebody is actively seeking to do your alliance harm, I don't know. I don't think that way. But let's go down your little rabbit hole and assume that this was entirely a "this will get 'em" approach. Then for the cost of a message, I got TIE rolled, and 6 pages of what is mostly just tears from you and your allies. And to top it off, you didn't defend your buddies on the battlefield, which just makes all the lip service demonstrating your obvious activity even worse. As for the NLON business, well if you expected a textbook war from an opponent that was going to easily roll over, you should have picked a different opponent. Try and pressure me all you like by hitting nations that are multiple years old and have intentionally built themselves to about the level they can rebuilt with an aid slot. Now as I understand it, you've been given our quite generous terms to review. Accept them or don't. Your peace terms offer is as irrelevant as you are placeholder.
  18. Wow, I sound so much cooler in your fantasies.
  19. Was I? Do tell, who sanctioned me and who removed it? Or did you have a good laugh and a celebratory wine cooler over a joke that you clearly didn't understand? Seems it made its rounds though given that you aren't on the server where the joke was made though. Sad that your only good news was fake news.
  20. Please feel free to elaborate how you have decided to label me as a rogue. Because I sent aid to a long time friend who I have a standing economic relationship with? Or perhaps because after your alliance came to owf and legitimized Mongoose with a string of your allies in tow, I hit an ally of yours and brought them into your war? Or just because you need to develop that into your agenda because you are left with no real avenue to deal with me politically or militarily? Or maybe because I came into intel of your allies spying on CLAWS and that created a politically inconvenient situation for you? You have nobody in range either intentionally by tier design or through lack of talent. News flash though, not my job to make your war easy. I am not going to apologize for not letting you be the only one to employ some non-traditional strategies. What you call roguery, I call philanthropy and community service.
  21. If that were true, that same bloc's leadership would not be giving vocal support to Lucius and defending his actions while simultaneously demonstrating complete unwillingness to defend his actions with force. Your words and the actions of your bloc do not align.
×
×
  • Create New...