Orkules Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 And I'd say if that war happened today and those terms were offered today, you'd have alot more people being quite vocal about their pissed offness at NPO for giving you such harsh terms. It's a sad statement that it couldn't happen then and I think is one of the greatest testaments to the rightness of our cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 The record just skipped back again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 And I'd say NPO would start drawing up plans to eliminate those people while telling them to "do something about it". For their security, of course. I'd be waiting. :jihad: If I remember correctly, when the terms were announced there was quite the outrage from the public on the terms we accepted. You're correct, but as we've seen tonight, people even allied to NPO would have spoken out. It's a sad statement that it couldn't happen then and I think is one of the greatest testaments to the rightness of our cause. Perhaps, it'd be better if everyone fighting on your side actually believed in your cause though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 If I remember correctly, when the terms were announced there was quite the outrage from the public on the terms we accepted. Yes, there was. And not only in public as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Yes, there was. And not only in public as well. And yet the terms were not reduced, only shortened by a few days. This would be another example of an action that if it were my ally doing it, I would have smacked someone upside the head for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vhalen Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Perhaps, it'd be better if everyone fighting on your side actually believed in your cause though. Getting 9000+ people to agree on anything is an exercise in futility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzelger Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Getting 9000+ people to agree on anything is an exercise in futility. I think we can all agree on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Getting 9000+ people to agree on anything is an exercise in futility. Yah pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 I think we can all agree on that. I disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzelger Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 I disagree. You'll pay for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 You'll pay for that. No he won't! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 I believe he was referring to the fact that you guys are gallivanting around like you won. And that you actually got a concession for being ON THE LOSING side of a war. But hey what do I know. You would be correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vhalen Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 I disagree. I want reps! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 If I was on the hegemony side right now and getting white peace, I'd take it as an insult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Karma is run as a joint venture between the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission, the Learned Elders of Zion, and Halliburton. I'm pretty sure the Devil has a stake in this as well. No, I said I wasn't involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 No, I said I wasn't involved. Everyone knows Satan is a dirty trickster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 No, I said I wasn't involved. I see what you did thar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Ivan is a big cuddly panda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Ivan is a big cuddly panda. Which one is Ivan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Which one is Ivan? he's all 4 of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 If I was on the hegemony side right now and getting white peace, I'd take it as an insult. Going by the definition, you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Going by the definition, you are. The Greenland Republic is a strong member of the Hegemony. Their long lasting treaties with NPO, IRON, and GGA are well documented and well known, all of them MADPs. ohwait, GR has no treaties with members of the Hegemony, and is fighting NPO, TPF, and NEW. So close amirite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shamed Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 The Greenland Republic is a strong member of the Hegemony. Their long lasting treaties with NPO, IRON, and GGA are well documented and well known, all of them MADPs.ohwait, GR has no treaties with members of the Hegemony, and is fighting NPO, TPF, and NEW. So close amirite? We have secret MADPs, Bob. We've always been incredibly close friends with the New Pacific Order and the Grand Global Alliance, though don't discount our great relationship with those folks at Valhalla! We paid them all those reps and tech just because we wanted to! It was an organized thing. We pay them for protection and to be part of the hegemony, so they'll roll with us when we get the need to chase after a reroll of someone or try to blackmail an alliance to spy on one of their allies' closest friends so we can roll them. No better bonding material, amirite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maconaldric Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 (edited) Which alliances are in Karma and who are the leaders of karma?Its the question of our time and its hard to get a straight answer to this question. People are claiming to be in Karma and others from the same alliance are denying they are in Karma. People are being told to speak to Karma leaders and later being told their are no Karma leaders. This might help you a bit and clarify everything for this Karma thing. http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Karma_War macon Edited May 7, 2009 by maconaldric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 This might help you a bit and clarify everything for this Karma thing.http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Karma_War macon Plenty of alliances listed on the Karma side of that webpage have come out and said they're not Karma alliances, although they fight on the same side in the overall conflict. For example, NSO and TOP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts