potato Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) . Edited March 23, 2009 by potato Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) I hate to say the use of nukes is only a good thing. Helps prevent the massive inflation of infrastructure and technology has that lead to global stagnation. I look forward to the day when we all blow each other up. It will be good. Edit: And it appears that this is in direct contradiction to Shan's quote of mine. I am such a hypocrite. Edited March 23, 2009 by Rebel Virginia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 A great policy to have. I, for one, can't wait to see 2000 nukes in the air. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shan Revan Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 I hate to say the use of nukes is only a good thing. Helps prevent the massive inflation of infrastructure and technology has that lead to global stagnation. I look forward to the day when we all blow each other up. It will be good.Edit: And it appears that this is in direct contradiction to Shan's quote of mine. I am such a hypocrite. It's okay, I forgive you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elpadrino Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 by one side nukes are just big cruise missiles so why not to use them? but by the other side they make the wars so less fun and this is bad I think if the war is +-equal go fight a conventional one but if you are being curbstomped use them so people understand the need of this game to have more equal sided wars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moridin Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 I sure do love us! *Moridin returns to polishing his warheads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunnyInc Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 I noticed you guys had climbed to 5th in the nuke rankings a couple of days ago and I was quite taken back at the time. Very impressive, Polaris! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penguin Posted March 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) by one side nukes are just big cruise missiles so why not to use them?but by the other side they make the wars so less fun and this is bad I don't know about you but I'll be having a blast. Edited March 23, 2009 by Penguin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hertugen Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Nukes, STA, NpO and Pink FLoyd in one thread!!! I approve this! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmmehhh Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Congrats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James I Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) Whoever came up with "Nuclear Polariferation" is getting a meddle from me. It's great.Anyway congratulations. May the plutonium's alpha decay keep you warm in the arctic frost. Haha - is that a veiled pun? Edited March 23, 2009 by James I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerdge Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) Good policy as long as you have a good Emperor (that you currently have). Removing the ban you had on nuclear first strikes was sad but necessary. [Edit:Freudian slip!] Edited March 23, 2009 by jerdge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred von Tirpitz Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) 100 GS : Pulled A Polar : Did what Polaris did, increased Nuke count by 40x over a two month period. Edit: avoiding use of translator. Edited March 23, 2009 by Alfred von Tirpitz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meyer Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Wow, over 2,000 nukes in only a few months, nice job NpO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingRich Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 I tried staying up for this announcement, but nevertheless, it feels so good inside, waking up next to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RKANYZ Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 100 GS : Pulled A Polar : Did what Polaris this, increased Nuke count by 40x over a two month period. Did what Polaris this? I don't play xbox... what does this mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Did what Polaris this? I don't play xbox... what does this mean? We need a translator, someone get Bob Sanders in here STAT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Dan Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Nice stats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromp Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 I would have done the same. Polar, best of luck to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred von Tirpitz Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 We need a translator, someone get Bob Sanders in here STAT! No please, not that!!!! its fixed. spare me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyFallout Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 And you all laughed when I was crazy about getting nukes, stockpiling nukes, and using nukes. Nice doctrine though. =3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) It's about damn time. Nuclear anti-proliferation is for !@#$%*^. Edited March 23, 2009 by Starcraftmazter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrnea Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) This is definetly a policy that I can get behind. However, I think MK stated it best in one of their nation's bios some time ago (during the War of the Coalition, I think it might have been Jeoh), with something to the effect of: Fun fact, MK does not condone nuclear first strikes. However, any ground, air, naval or cruise missile attacks will be met with full nuclear retaliation. In any case, o/ Polaris FIRE ZE MISSILES! (When it's time to go to war, of course) Edited March 23, 2009 by Arrnea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Interesting. I don't think any other alliance has ever expressed an intention to go nuclear in defence of another alliance before. Your first-strike-in-defence policy was expected after seeing the damage done to attackers in the last war compared with other wars in 2008, and is to be welcomed as long as you don't aim them at us this time . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draztikus Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Interesting. I don't think any other alliance has ever expressed an intention to go nuclear in defence of another alliance before. Your first-strike-in-defence policy was expected after seeing the damage done to attackers in the last war compared with other wars in 2008, and is to be welcomed as long as you don't aim them at us this time . Don't attack us or STA then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.