This is probably a bit hopeful, but it'll be interesting to see whether the winner takes a moment to look at his closest challengers - some of whom he'll surely recognise as somewhat weak in the art of polemics - and reflects or just cements his reputation with a succession of posts that display false emotion, illogic, inanity or endlessness. I can accept that some of the nominations and votes for members of MK might be swallowed up under the sheer weight of our "side"'s numbers (in terms of game activity, in terms of those signed up on our boards and in absolute terms), but notwithstanding the slight inherent bias, let's be clear: the winner is going to be someone who for the most part indisputably damages the perception of his alliance and himself amongst those reading what he writes, whatever their political persuasion.