Jump to content

James I

Members
  • Posts

    824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About James I

  • Birthday 12/07/1988

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Marshdonia
  • Alliance Name
    Mushroom Kingdom
  • Resource 1
    Cattle
  • Resource 2
    Coal

James I's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. and thank you, for visiting my profile today, at 8:58 AM

  2. I'm stalking you

  3. you visit me often!

  4. hi, thanks for visiting me 2 weeks ago today

  5. [quote name='ChairmanHal' timestamp='1328565567' post='2915590'] Hopefully those of you upping the post count of this thread with negative comments will eventually figure out the symbolism of the following image, if you can't, PM me: [img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_CAoFDpupTaY/SSDH-DREBrI/AAAAAAAABX0/BRpgWSny-cQ/s400/LUCY+FOOTBALL.jpg[/img] [/quote] Has anyone sent you a PM?
  6. hahaha your nation was going so thought to pm you in here

  7. [quote name='Warmongrel' timestamp='1322973978' post='2861480'] The Legends of Cybernations, as remembered by Warmongrel. The list is long, compiled from memory, and probably forgets a few people.[/quote] I've heard of eight of those. Can anyone else claim as many as that?
  8. You really are as brave as a lion for doing this because it looks like hard work.
  9. [quote name='Timeline' timestamp='1301136947' post='2677050'] I have one question. Which signatures carry the greater weight: this pact's co-signatories' or those which bind your alliance, those of your government? After all, what happens in the scenario where signatories to this treaty find their alliances in direct conflict with each other and are bound to attack one another by their government? [b]Will refusal to attack be justified on the basis of this treaty?[/b] Now, while I have grown fond of the Orange Defense Network and Umbrella, I must still do my very utmost to reserve judgement on the Mushroom Kingdom, but it is a mere enquiry, is it not? [/quote] Quite astute. That is the consequence of this document. It was not signed on a whim.
  10. This is probably a bit hopeful, but it'll be interesting to see whether the winner takes a moment to look at his closest challengers - some of whom he'll surely recognise as somewhat weak in the art of polemics - and reflects or just cements his reputation with a succession of posts that display false emotion, illogic, inanity or endlessness. I can accept that some of the nominations and votes for members of MK might be swallowed up under the sheer weight of our "side"'s numbers (in terms of game activity, in terms of those signed up on our boards and in absolute terms), but notwithstanding the slight inherent bias, let's be clear: the winner is going to be someone who for the most part indisputably damages the perception of his alliance and himself amongst those reading what he writes, whatever their political persuasion.
  11. 5. If you take reps, then you are clearly lacking in that most prized of assets: honour.
×
×
  • Create New...