Jaiar Posted March 26, 2016 Report Share Posted March 26, 2016 (edited) Who cares about tactics. Results have greater affect if a long war actually happens. Oculus/Co. win and destroy Bones/Co. Bones/Co. leave the world. Oculus/Co./Top250 vulnerable. DBDC is even stronger without fighting. Bones/Co. win destroying Oculus/Co. top nations Many Oculus/Co. quit along the way. Oculus/Co./Top250 vulnerable. DBDC is even stronger without fighting. Edited March 26, 2016 by Jaiar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted March 26, 2016 Report Share Posted March 26, 2016 so you are asking for Doom to get involved?I'm suggesting that those that speak about cowardice and sit safely to the side doing nothing are hypocrites. By and large, Doom have my respect for not engaging in such banality. Some of you as individuals do not have my respect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeybum Posted March 26, 2016 Report Share Posted March 26, 2016 I'm happy this topic clarified the somewhat confused topic of whether there is a state of war between GLoF & Spatr.  For further reference - since we really dislike making announcments - you may consider anytime GLoF joins in what seems to be an Oculus wide attack, as our de facto declaration of war.  Or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rileyaddaff Posted March 26, 2016 Report Share Posted March 26, 2016 So, I name you, you and your alliance comrades both in SPATR and DBDC, cowards.This coming from an alliance that has ties to every alliance that has a decent upper tier. I guess it makes it that much easier for you to roll the next grouping. Plan things out for 4-6 months and drop them a month or two before they get rolled. I guess by your standards i guess that honor and not cowardice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rileyaddaff Posted March 26, 2016 Report Share Posted March 26, 2016 I don't believe they have 600 nations in range, but I also wouldn't act like I'm the baddest on the block when I only fight with overwhelming odds in my favor, it's unlikely that anyone facing the supertier nations will do so for more than one round due to the number of nations in range of them in Oculus. It's the ideal strategy to do against nations in that tier, sure, but its not exactly courage tactics. RIA sent nation after nation to grind down the only DBDC nation in range of us for months and it only stopped due to us losing the last war we participated in, had we been on the winning side I doubt any NAP would have been signed. they have something along the lines of 150 nations above 200k NS, too lazy to figure out exactly how many are in bones' range though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rileyaddaff Posted March 26, 2016 Report Share Posted March 26, 2016 Â I'm confused. Â Exactly which side are you pulling for in this situation? I believe he is stating the fact that even if you sell out and treaty oculus AAs, that it just delays you're own rolling. You know the story, hey guys (polar) can you try start with a war with group "X", we (oculus) got your back. Say you succeed in that effort, you find your AA getting dropped prior to the next war, and will be looking for support from the ones you just rolled. So the word of the day for you is "foresight" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devialance Posted March 26, 2016 Report Share Posted March 26, 2016 Â What exactly is your point? Â They are saving people to bring him down? But why, its not like Bones and Co can DoW the whole upper tier of these alliances ?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caladin Posted March 26, 2016 Report Share Posted March 26, 2016 Hey calladin, dont see you fighting anyone or doin anything but running your mouth. Whos the coward? I'll fight, when ordered to engage or rolled. Until then I'm happy sitting here, looking pretty and being a coward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 Our strategy will make future wars more interesting because we'll all be back on a level playing field of zero land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDRocks Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 Our strategy will make future wars more interesting because we'll all be back on a level playing field of zero land. How so? Most of the land accumulated on this world is sitting in DBDC. What you mean to say is your strategy is a test run for the future easier war on them(If DBDC even cares for this game anymore) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 You don't really know JoshuaR if you think that's what he meant. Â There is zero interest in that from his/our end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caliph Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 Our strategy will make future wars more interesting because we'll all be back on a level playing field of zero land.  So this is EQ part 2 with a side flip from Umbrella? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 So this is EQ part 2 with a side flip from Umbrella? No, that was a much bigger conflict. No one is seeking a bigger conflict, if you note Roq's post right above yours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 No, that was a much bigger conflict. No one is seeking a bigger conflict, if you note Roq's post right above yours. Nobody is interested in a bigger conflict except NpO you mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 Nobody is interested in a bigger conflict except NpO you mean? Brb, couping Polar govt and then finding the answer to your question. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 Brb, couping Polar govt and then finding the answer to your question. :P let's do it, Shah for Emperor, Berbers for Grub Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted March 27, 2016 Report Share Posted March 27, 2016 let's do it, Shah for Emperor, Berbers for Grub Contested convention it is! :awesome: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidMercury Posted March 29, 2016 Report Share Posted March 29, 2016 Brb, couping Polar govt and then finding the answer to your question. :P  Already did it years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero-One Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016  Already did it years ago.  It's good to see you posting again my friend :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 Â So this is EQ part 2 with a side flip from Umbrella? That doesn't work since Umb was the target :P Â There's a difference between allies, half of whom were once Umbrella and took the name of a SBSC alliance, who legit raided their way to victory with sweet target list spreadsheets and actual skill and organization, and people like BONES who piggy backed on that success and piggy-backed a lot of his "friends" along with him, who've been allowed to grow for far too long and have always been hostile. Also, NEW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caustic Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 Burn it all down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero-One Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 That doesn't work since Umb was the target :P Â There's a difference between allies, half of whom were once Umbrella and took the name of a SBSC alliance, who legit raided their way to victory with sweet target list spreadsheets and actual skill and organization, and people like BONES who piggy backed on that success and piggy-backed a lot of his "friends" along with him, who've been allowed to grow for far too long and have always been hostile. Also, NEW. Â Caliph should know. Â He too, was once Umbrella. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) That doesn't work since Umb was the target :P Â There's a difference between allies, half of whom were once Umbrella and took the name of a SBSC alliance, who legit raided their way to victory with sweet target list spreadsheets and actual skill and organization, and people like BONES who piggy backed on that success and piggy-backed a lot of his "friends" along with him, who've been allowed to grow for far too long and have always been hostile. Also, NEW.DBDC thrives through skill, organisation and politics in contrast to Bones and well, friends. Also, noticing a policy here from Limitless Nexus pushing the rhetoric of war between certain parties. Edited March 30, 2016 by shahenshah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caliph Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 Â Caliph should know. Â He too, was once Umbrella. Â Â I was twice in Umbrella :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crownguard Posted March 30, 2016 Report Share Posted March 30, 2016 Third time is the charm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.