Taget Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 You stole our Olympus. Grrrrrr!!! But congrats and good luck anyway! And heya Cao Pai. Haven't seen ya in awhile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='AAAAAAAAAAGGGG' timestamp='1341680034' post='3005985'] You sure do talk a lot about anarchy despite avoiding two of the last three wars. [/quote] Funny to see this comment coming from Umbrella, you guys avoided defending your allies in Sparta and MHA in recent wars and only took part by joining the winning side who was curb stomping your other allies where your help wasn't even necessary. Olympus defended NPO when they were declared on by Fark, so they filled all their obligations in that one. When DH declared on NPO, Olympus defended NPO there as well even when it didn't put them on the winning side. So they at least have consistency in filling their obligations even if it means them taking heavy damage in unfavorable wars, but them joining in to help reduce the damage you guys take as you pursue further vendettas/boredom wars after declaring on one of their allies just previously wouldn't make sense. Olympus, BAPS, and Valhalla also fought in the BiPolar War even when the odds weren't favorable for them from the start, something I've never seen Umbrella do even when you have allies getting rolled. So all the alliances who formed Anarchy Inc have fought in more difficult and risky wars than you guys, that you guys are trying to insult them for not bandwagoning in to help you in your curb stomps or take damage in wars which have nothing to do with them is pathetic. Or were you hoping in those previous wars they would of jumped in defend Sparta/MHA in your place since you were to busy helping the side rolling them? Either way you can't expect them to join every retarded war you guys start up for no reason and you guys hitting CSN for continuing to attack a spy who was still on their ZI list doesn't count as anything more than an excuse. They aren't afraid of tough wars and honoring their obligations, but have no reason to pointlessly let you guys lead them into retarded wars against those they have no reason to fight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omniscient1 Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Congrats guys. Good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cao Pai Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='Taget' timestamp='1341706144' post='3006326'] You stole our Olympus. And heya Cao Pai. Haven't seen ya in awhile. [/quote] We all know Olympus will control Anarchy Inc. ¬_¬ And ohai. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrill Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 (edited) Awesome! Way to go Anarchy Inc. \o/ May your Business always be Booming.\o/ o/ Edited July 8, 2012 by thrill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='thrill' timestamp='1341710710' post='3006361'] Awesome! Way to go Anarchy Inc. \o/ May your Business always be Booming.\o/ o/ [/quote] Thanks thrill. You're always welcome to join us if you change your mind. We'll keep a light on for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendoftheSkies Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Congrats to the three newly merged AAs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topgun0820 Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='thrill' timestamp='1341710710' post='3006361'] Awesome! Way to go Anarchy Inc. \o/ May your Business always be Booming.\o/ o/ [/quote] o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus Long Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='white majik' timestamp='1341637281' post='3005539'] O/ And i hate you all [/quote] You know where to apply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pompeius Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 An interesting change. I wish you the best of luck with the new AA. o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KainIIIC Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='Cao Pai' timestamp='1341709336' post='3006354'] We all know Olympus will control Anarchy Inc. ¬_¬ [/quote] Well, it'd certainly be in your best interests for Olympus to control Anarchy Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kittenland Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 (edited) Umbrella doesn't like us? Ok cancel everything. Edited July 8, 2012 by Kittenland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='SpiderJerusalem' timestamp='1341704499' post='3006294'] Ello' Wally [/quote] Snap! the ghost of Christmas past. Sup dawg? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suryanto tan Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1341706570' post='3006332'] Funny to see this comment coming from Umbrella, you guys avoided defending your allies in Sparta and MHA in recent wars and only took part by joining the winning side who was curb stomping your other allies where your help wasn't even necessary. Olympus defended NPO when they were declared on by Fark, so they filled all their obligations in that one. When DH declared on NPO, Olympus defended NPO there as well even when it didn't put them on the winning side. So they at least have consistency in filling their obligations even if it means them taking heavy damage in unfavorable wars, but them joining in to help reduce the damage you guys take as you pursue further vendettas/boredom wars after declaring on one of their allies just previously wouldn't make sense. Olympus, BAPS, and Valhalla also fought in the BiPolar War even when the odds weren't favorable for them from the start, something I've never seen Umbrella do even when you have allies getting rolled. So all the alliances who formed Anarchy Inc have fought in more difficult and risky wars than you guys, that you guys are trying to insult them for not bandwagoning in to help you in your curb stomps or take damage in wars which have nothing to do with them is pathetic. Or were you hoping in those previous wars they would of jumped in defend Sparta/MHA in your place since you were to busy helping the side rolling them? Either way you can't expect them to join every retarded war you guys start up for no reason and you guys hitting CSN for continuing to attack a spy who was still on their ZI list doesn't count as anything more than an excuse. They aren't afraid of tough wars and honoring their obligations, but have no reason to pointlessly let you guys lead them into retarded wars against those they have no reason to fight. [/quote] QFT. I have yet to see Umbrella defending their allies in the losing side. From as long as I can remember they have been akways cowardly and switch sides every so often just to be on the winning sides. One of these days, when MK ends come, I will not be surprised to see them citing thousands of reason just so that they do not haveto defend them. Umbrella militarily strong but mentally coward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farnsworth Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Congrats on the formation! I see great things happening with this alliance! [b]o/ Anarchy, Inc. [/b] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suryanto tan Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Sad to see that this joyous occasion also means the end of three great alliances that I have always held in high respect. May the Anarchy be greater than its predecessors and may they be the new force great and brave enough to challenge the old regime o/ may all your foes be in state of anarchy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xiphosis Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='suryanto tan' timestamp='1341732286' post='3006564'] Umbrella militarily strong but mentally coward. [/quote] Pretty much hit the nail on the head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingzog Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Three alliances I respect coming together. Sad to lose an ally, of course, but I think good things will come from this realignment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holy Empire of Halin Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='Xiphosis' timestamp='1341748662' post='3006611'] Pretty much hit the nail on the head. [/quote] Its about us not liking you in anyway, therefor we wont help SF directly on indirectly. It has nothing about losing side or winning side, an argument that is beyond stupid. Welcome Anarchy, great graphic work you have there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterman1043 Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Congratulations! May our friendships carry over into this shiny new alliance. Good luck Anarchy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Bromeini Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='Holy Empire of Halin' timestamp='1341751566' post='3006621'] Its about us not liking you in anyway, therefor we wont help SF directly on indirectly. It has nothing about losing side or winning side, an argument that is beyond stupid. Welcome Anarchy, great graphic work you have there. [/quote] No Umbrella has never fought a war and never will because they're cowards. [i]Why can't you understand that. [/i] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emphix Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Can't wait to see how we roll. o/ Anarchy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='suryanto tan' timestamp='1341732286' post='3006564'] QFT. I have yet to see Umbrella defending their allies in the losing side. From as long as I can remember they have been akways cowardly and switch sides every so often just to be on the winning sides. One of these days, when MK ends come, I will not be surprised to see them citing thousands of reason just so that they do not haveto defend them. Umbrella militarily strong but mentally coward. [/quote] Very well said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AAAAAAAAAAGGGG Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Kittenland' timestamp='1341726559' post='3006513'] Umbrella doesn't like us? Ok cancel everything. [/quote] I'll just use this as a springboard to respond to the hoards of comments that misinterpreted my short comment! My comment was simply an observation. Valhalla has not participated (at least not in this one) in two of the last three wars. Granted, you have your reasons, just like we had ours last war when we saw limited action. I still think any alliance can use a global war to push their agenda some way, even if they are not directly involved (see TOP in Bipolar, perfect example). Also, many of the ex-Kronos and ex-NoR members were very fond of Valhalla, and we had respect for Olympus, for the most part. Again, not sure where that came from. Lastly, the point that we want you to fight our war - again, not sure what that comes from! I couldn't care less what side you were a part of if you were to join the war. We learned it's not fun to deprive our members of war, and I'm not sure why your alliance would want to do that, regardless of politics. That said, congrats on your merger. I hope to see exciting things from this alliance. Edited July 8, 2012 by AAAAAAAAAAGGGG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 If we wanted to talk about AA's of bloated NS and no history of risking that NS there's a perfectly fine Umbrella thread already established. Then again with all that NS bloat, until the day that GPA decides that pacifism is dumb and neutrality is a lie, there really isn't any one who can do anything about Umbrella by themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.