obfuse Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Not after the way we were treated by them. The original terms called for a baptism in fire and blood. I thought the FARK gov were rather lenient! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacapo Saladin Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 The original terms called for a baptism in fire and blood. I thought the FARK gov were rather lenient! Whatever grace Fark may have gained from being "Lenient" was lost the moment they decided to get juvenile and call out IRON in this post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hakim Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Whatever grace Fark may have gained from being "Lenient" was lost the moment they decided to get juvenile and call out IRON in this post. Well said... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 As per Article 10:bay102174 is underage, FinsterBaby, Shan Revan, Peron, Griffon, MCRABT, Matt Miller, Grizz Goose, Krash are all unable to purchase alcohol due to themselves living in a country (that shall conveniently) remain nameless where alcohol is a capital offense. Whilst I am not in anyway IRON leadership or have anything to do with the IRON command structure Id like to give you a beer review in lieu of my comrades in the desperate hope of steaming if nothing else; the flow of tears. BNT's Beer Review Good Points: The label looks good. Good adverts in the past Bad Points: Pretty much everything else General comments: In my opinion truly awful, little more than marketing in a bottle. Not even brewed in the US anymore for the main part. Brewed with a collection of various grains, rather than barley which is what beer should be made from. Advertised as tasting "Fresh". For "fresh" read bland. People who like beer don't like Budweiser. Still, I'd drink it if it was all there was available (and have done in the past). Thats funny, they never mentioned it during peace terms talks. how kind of you to make this up on the spotinform us of the horrible things Fark makes people do Also, bay102174 considering your PM regarding your review you shouldnt even be in this thread as childish as that was Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cortath Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 I apologize for not posting earlier. Let me congratulate an alliance who stood with us. Though I do not envy the method or means with which you were pushed down, I smile to see you rise again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruler with Plan X Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 The funny thing is, FARK was suppose to protect us.... right! hahaWe'd get attacked and We would go to FARK, their answer "just attack them by yourself" There was no protecting... What a joke! Fark is very mid tier heavy when it comes to nation strength and most of the attacks were on sub-1k nations We just don't have anyone who can fight them, our military is voluntary and we cannot just go and find some guy who's on our AA and in range and yell at them to attack. It's against our laws Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandwich Controversy Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 It boggles my mind that any alliance with a voluntary military can even function. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalTrevor Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Fark is very mid tier heavy when it comes to nation strength and most of the attacks were on sub-1k nationsWe just don't have anyone who can fight them, our military is voluntary and we cannot just go and find some guy who's on our AA and in range and yell at them to attack. It's against our laws I really hope this post isn't serious. A government not able to tell its members what to do, wtf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druss the Legend Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 The OP Made me Chuckle. o/ FARK also, congratulations IRON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Congratulations IRON. May your recovery be speedy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylar Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 congrats to iron much love Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruler with Plan X Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 (edited) It boggles my mind that any alliance with a voluntary military can even function. It works very very well actually, which can be seen in how we fought in the past few wars. A very high percentage of our alliance is apart of the military. edit I really hope this post isn't serious. A government not able to tell its members what to do, wtf It'd be like me, as DMoFA, going and telling some random guy in our alliance to go and diplo to another alliance. It's not that we CAN'T tell them what to do, it's that they just aren't in that department. I get that the military is a different field entirely, but that's just how it works for us and it has worked well so there is no need to change it Edited August 24, 2009 by Ruler with Plan X Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadshot Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Congratulations on terms completion IRON, may you grow swiftly in your freedom. As for the OP, I particularly don't care what Fark said or how it was worded. I know what IRON is and always has been in my experiences, and I know what Fark has been. o/ IRON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcturus Jefferson Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 It boggles my mind that any alliance with a voluntary military can even function. Then the Fark blitz on IRON is even more impressive, isn't it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandwich Controversy Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 It works very very well actually, which can be seen in how we fought in the past few wars. A very high percentage of our alliance is apart of the military. Indeed, your counter-blitz against IRON was the stuff of legends. It just confused the hell out of me when you said that. In my time here I've never been a member of a democracy so I guess I can't imagine anything other than an all-powerful government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rand0m her0 Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Fark is very mid tier heavy when it comes to nation strength and most of the attacks were on sub-1k nationsWe just don't have anyone who can fight them, our military is voluntary and we cannot just go and find some guy who's on our AA and in range and yell at them to attack. It's against our laws So they failed to respond to a reasonable request to do something by their officers? Isn't that exactly what your complaining about IRON nations doing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 (edited) Fark is very mid tier heavy when it comes to nation strength and most of the attacks were on sub-1k nationsWe just don't have anyone who can fight them, our military is voluntary and we cannot just go and find some guy who's on our AA and in range and yell at them to attack. It's against our laws So basically your saying that FARK nations choose not to defend IRON nations thus putting FARK in violation of the TOS? edited for clarity. Edited August 24, 2009 by Lord Levistus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Whatever grace Fark may have gained from being "Lenient" was lost the moment they decided to get juvenile and call out IRON in this post. Being honest is now known as juvenile? I think not. My opinion of FARK has been raised considerably now that I've seen their willingness to shoot straight with the public. IRON suffered terms far, far more lenient than those they helped to impose and the fact that they could not consistently stick to such lenient terms speaks volumes as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coven Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Congrats on being released from terms IRON. Major respect guys and gals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruler with Plan X Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 So basically your saying that FARK nations choose not to defend IRON nations thus putting FARK in violation of the TOS?edited for clarity. So I'm basically saying that we don't have very many people in that range, hell those that are THAT small are probably ghosts or they won't stay that small for long. When we did run across a nation who was willing to and was in range we used them Like I said most of the attacks were sub-1k NS which leaves a very small window of people who can attack Also don't twist my words because I certainly would not do the same to you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buds The Man Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 If you had been on the IRON council when this happened you would have done every last one of the beer reviews yourself just to have an excuse to get drunk This could very well be true HMMM Being honest is now known as juvenile? I think not. My opinion of FARK has been raised considerably now that I've seen their willingness to shoot straight with the public. IRON suffered terms far, far more lenient than those they helped to impose and the fact that they could not consistently stick to such lenient terms speaks volumes as well. NO taking one last pot shot at IRON on the way out the door is what is being questioned here. You sir need to let go of the past as it seems to tear you up inside get happy Weiss and move on. Congrats Iron good to see you free. Best of luck to FARK as they continue on their road as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnathan Chaos Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Whatever grace Fark may have gained from being "Lenient" was lost the moment they decided to get juvenile and call out IRON in this post. It could not have been said better in as few words. Granted we lost the war, but we maintain our dignity and honor. No price or popularity points are worth losing that. Far too much respect, diginty and honor has died already within this thread, and beyond. o/ IRON o/ Council o/ every single IRON nation o/ Respect o/ Diginity o/ Honor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 So I'm basically saying that we don't have very many people in that range, hell those that are THAT small are probably ghosts or they won't stay that small for long. When we did run across a nation who was willing to and was in range we used themLike I said most of the attacks were sub-1k NS which leaves a very small window of people who can attack Also don't twist my words because I certainly would not do the same to you Then you ask allies, or you send Military aid to the Nation being attacked. Saying that it's against your laws to order a Fark nation to act is a pretty weak excuse when you pledged to defend IRON during the Terms of Surrender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bay102174 Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Then the Fark blitz on IRON is even more impressive, isn't it. Impressive? No sorry. IRON, after attacking ROK, was in a defensive position. Its not like we didn't know you were coming. So your patting yourselves on the back for attacking us while we were attacking two targets apiece. By that way of thinking your attack would have been more impressive if we had filled all of our attacking slots before you attacked. Also knowing you are going to out number your opponent 5 to 1 must have built allot of courage for you. I will say if you had come at us with one large alliance less than you did, we might have had a different outcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Impero Romano Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Granted we lost the war, but we maintain our dignity and honor. No price or popularity points are worth losing that. I could be wrong, but when your high gov goes around insulting, defaming, and deliberately slandering (albeit in a most hilariously ironic fashion) my alliance to 3rd parties they don't even know due to events that led up to this war I wouldn't exactly call it acting with "honor and dignity". But hey, to each his own. Congratulations on your release from terms IRON. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.