Jump to content

Ruler with Plan X

Members
  • Posts

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ruler with Plan X

  1. As NATO has, in the past, declared aggressively on our allies, as I'm fairly sure we've done to them, this treaty is not currently active.
  2. You took a very strange history course. Fark and RoK were never in Q. Fark got an offer, but after we discussed it with SF NPO got mad at us for not keeping it secret. We did have an MDoAP with NPO, but that was there for purely political reasons by Jan '09.
  3. [quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1354603615' post='3060252'] Er...we've been members of CnG for over a month now. [url="http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/CnG"]http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/CnG[/url] [/quote] Not according to that Wiki page you're not
  4. It's always terrible to hear that someone in the community has died. My most sincere condolences.
  5. [quote name='King Srqt' timestamp='1346255189' post='3026369'] I was RIA gov at the time and from being in SF gov channels Karma Gov channels and being one of the most active people in our side of planning the war at the time I can tell you it was what the vast majority of the bloc wanted. Just because FARK wanted to sit back while an alliance that we needed to have any chance of changing the world dynamic burned because they thought they would lose does not mean the rest of us did. [/quote] We had a checklist in January on how to prepare for the upcoming war against Pacifica+co, what we thought the sides would be and what we wanted out of the war. We were prepared for that war, we wanted to participate in that war and we wanted to win that war. We counterblitzed IRON and if memory serves we ended up taking more damage than almost any other alliance on our side while dishing out much more than we took. We rejected backroom deal after backroom deal attempting to get IRON through the war undamaged because they attacked our blocmate. We could have chosen the easy path, accepted the deal presented, gone for easier targets and let RoK burn, but we didn't and it was never an option. To say we wanted to sit back and let OV, GOD and VE burn is a complete misrepresentation of what happened. In the days running up to the war our .gov was certain we were about to get the absolute !@#$ beaten out of us in a well orchestrated curbstomp and we were prepared for a second holy war. Krack was not .gov at the time and left to make Aloha shortly after the war ended As to VE they thought they were a shoo-in for SF so they didn't take our QnA seriously. Their representative screwed the pooch and the damage was done before .gov could get in with serious answers. That was 3 or 4 years ago. No one cares
  6. Well, since everyone in your alliance is under 10k ns, you don't really have anything worth blowing up
  7. [quote name='Jake Liebenow' timestamp='1340682145' post='2996454'] To the moon, Alice! Fark, this war feels very, very right. We're coming for you. [/quote] Well, 6 of you are as of this post. I'm sad to see that Umbrella gave you their old war guides instead of the ones we graciously let them use
  8. [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1339098941' post='2978866'] How on earth could a rival like TPF know that Fark relays logs to their forums for other gov to read (like any sensible alliance) yet SF did not? I'm calling BS on that one. [/quote] It's obvious isn't it? Your precursors TotalFarkistan! took this bit of confidential information with them when they split and passed it down through the ages in a Tome of Secrets. Only your AAs reverence for it as a Holy Book kept it from being public knowledge.
  9. [quote name='Ninja Colt' timestamp='1338589935' post='2975882'] hehe still using erection jokes please disband after the next war tia [/quote] We don't even make jokes about it. It's just what it's called in the charter. We have redefined the word erection to mean an event where certain members of the community are lifted up to positions of honor in the alliance. We're an incredibly serious group of people and I, for one, resent the idea of such an important and time honored tradition of Farkistan being considered a joke.
  10. [quote name='Tick1' timestamp='1334359659' post='2952548'] Yeah, I don't follow. What are you guys trying to prove? [/quote] Is a tech deal done after the money is sent or after the buyer has received their tech? If the tech dealer received money on the 7th of February then you would expect the deal to last until the ~27th when the tech payment expires and the deal can be renewed. GOONS raided on the 16th when the target was scheduled to send tech to GOONS' blocmates the next day (or the day after that, I'm always fuzzy on expiration dates).
  11. [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1312665894' post='2773743'] I think you replied to the wrong post there. MK is anything but a TPF spinoff [/quote] Prolly, I think I was looking for someone from PC/NG, dunno how I got you /or I'm just retarded //it's prolly that I'm retarded
  12. [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1312613797' post='2773408'] Actually, Fark has been the SF alliance we've gotten along with worst for quite some time. As far as we've figured out, Fark partly blames us for them being held down so long in GW2 or something to those effects, IIRC. [/quote] We didn't hate you for being the spinoff of a spinoff of a group of traitorous scum, but it didn't help that we hated TPF for other reasons as well (as a general rule most splitting alliances just inherited the view that we had on their parent alliance until the new alliance starts making waves). Most of it had to do with your guys' attitude on the OWF and in game. It wasn't some sort of active 'Damn those guys in PC, what can we do today to ruin them!' sort of dislike. It was just a normal, everyday 'Those guys are annoying' type of dislike (most alliances have been in this category at some point in time). Our dealings were prolly reflective of that. /and no, Fark isn't a sekrit member of SF that sekritly makes all their decisions //I would need several small towns to be able to count on hand the amount of times Fark and SF have butted heads after and while we were in SF
  13. [quote name='the rebel' timestamp='1312379620' post='2770898'] Just because Fark chose not to prosecute does not change the fact it was a community accepted rogue action, not unless spying on each others nations is now an acceptable thing and not a rogue action? [/quote] Gather intelligence is not automatically a rogue action, spying away a nuke is a rogue action, gather intel is what you do at 2am when you're hammered and think it'll be funny. This is not the first time someone has done this.
  14. If you read the treaty you'll notice that it reads strangely like a detective story and you'd get a strange feeling that it's the same exact treaty that we had with them for a year and a half with the words 'or by choice' thrown in where it talks about military action. These words were chosen very, very carefully in order to change as little as possible in the hi-larious treaty. /know what we call an MDP with criteria? An ODP
  15. [quote name='trance addict' timestamp='1311365949' post='2761453'] I agree, some people think that they're so useless they don't even bother to post them to the OWF? It's a shame really. [/quote] I can think of no honor higher than the honor of being left off the OWF. This place is a wretched hive of scum and villainy
  16. I've learned some things today. I learned that FA policies change based on who holds the office and the situation, people get mad when they're deprived of an opportunity to make faces at people they don't like and that some people think ODPs are worthless pieces of paper. Thanks everyone!
  17. [quote name='FearUnited' timestamp='1310166890' post='2752901'] Sad to hear, but its no problem at all. I'm not forcing any alliance to participate. Just anyone who does, ill be help promoting and trying to get good ties in. We already have MHA members, Fark, PPO, and TDO down here. [/quote] I hate this thing too, actually. Color politics have been, are now and will always be dumb
  18. [quote name='Denial' timestamp='1308809910' post='2739149'] Okay, let me try. Fark takes issue with Nordreich yet is too politically inept to do a damn thing about it. [/quote] I'm sorry that we do not roll alliances for OOC reasons, but the topic of discussion here is our shuttering of consulates. If you want to have a discussion about the use of OOC CBs as being legitimate I'd do that elsewhere.
  19. [quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1308806378' post='2739047'] [img]http://www.depend.com/images/products/19558_pkg.jpg[/img] For those times when things just dont add up in your favor. [/quote] I'm sure the consulates wore them proudly to their graves
  20. There is a certain scum of the earth that I absolutely hate and I believe the world would be a much better without this scum. I am, of course, talking about consulates. They're just plain annoying. So, from this point on I am shuttering all consulates. From this point forward Farkistan will only have embassies with foreign alliances. If you believe that you have a consulate with Fark, you're wrong because they don't exist anymore. Please sign back in and request an embassy so you can post important topics like declarations of war
  21. [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1308800275' post='2738923'] Get mistaken as a far right terrorist group and, as a result, bring FARK to CN in the First Great Greenlight. To be honest, FARK should probably send Nordreich a tribute of tech and cash every month as thanks for bringing them here. I think the two of them would be the very best friends, I do. They're the original odd couple! And best of all, they both take great pleasure in revealing the press to be populated by brain dead clods. [/quote] No, in fact, never
  22. [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1307803202' post='2729185'] Umbrella is actually good at war though [/quote] My heart, she is broken
  23. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1305509369' post='2712519'] I have a quick and sincere question to the leaders of MHA, FARK, R&R and Sparta: If in future a group of ex-members of your alliance decide that you are a bad leader and then coup you, will you be ok with that? [/quote] The day 905 and I turn this alliance into a personality cult, drive out all opposition and use the alliance as a vehicle for personal crusades against friend and foe alike. Then yes I would be fine with it
×
×
  • Create New...