Ruler with Plan X

As NATO has, in the past, declared aggressively on our allies, as I'm fairly sure we've done to them, this treaty is not currently active.

I play a mean sousaphone

You took a very strange history course. Fark and RoK were never in Q. Fark got an offer, but after we discussed it with SF NPO got mad at us for not keeping it secret. We did have an MDoAP with NPO, but that was there for purely political reasons by Jan '09.

[quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1354603615' post='3060252'] Er...we've been members of CnG for over a month now. [url="http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/CnG"]http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/CnG[/url] [/quote] Not according to that Wiki page you're not

It's always terrible to hear that someone in the community has died. My most sincere condolences.

[quote name='King Srqt' timestamp='1346255189' post='3026369'] I was RIA gov at the time and from being in SF gov channels Karma Gov channels and being one of the most active people in our side of planning the war at the time I can tell you it was what the vast majority of the bloc wanted. Just because FARK wanted to sit back while an alliance that we needed to have any chance of changing the world dynamic burned because they thought they would lose does not mean the rest of us did. [/quote] We had a checklist in January on how to prepare for the upcoming war against Pacifica+co, what we thought the sides would be and what we wanted out of the war. We were prepared for that war, we wanted to participate in that war and we wanted to win that war. We counterblitzed IRON and if memory serves we ended up taking more damage than almost any other alliance on our side while dishing out much more than we took. We rejected backroom deal after backroom deal attempting to get IRON through the war undamaged because they attacked our blocmate. We could have chosen the easy path, accepted the deal presented, gone for easier targets and let RoK burn, but we didn't and it was never an option. To say we wanted to sit back and let OV, GOD and VE burn is a complete misrepresentation of what happened. In the days running up to the war our .gov was certain we were about to get the absolute !@#$ beaten out of us in a well orchestrated curbstomp and we were prepared for a second holy war. Krack was not .gov at the time and left to make Aloha shortly after the war ended As to VE they thought they were a shoo-in for SF so they didn't take our QnA seriously. Their representative screwed the pooch and the damage was done before .gov could get in with serious answers. That was 3 or 4 years ago. No one cares

Well, since everyone in your alliance is under 10k ns, you don't really have anything worth blowing up

[quote name='Jake Liebenow' timestamp='1340682145' post='2996454'] To the moon, Alice! Fark, this war feels very, very right. We're coming for you. [/quote] Well, 6 of you are as of this post. I'm sad to see that Umbrella gave you their old war guides instead of the ones we graciously let them use

[quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1339098941' post='2978866'] How on earth could a rival like TPF know that Fark relays logs to their forums for other gov to read (like any sensible alliance) yet SF did not? I'm calling BS on that one. [/quote] It's obvious isn't it? Your precursors TotalFarkistan! took this bit of confidential information with them when they split and passed it down through the ages in a Tome of Secrets. Only your AAs reverence for it as a Holy Book kept it from being public knowledge.

[quote name='Ninja Colt' timestamp='1338589935' post='2975882'] hehe still using erection jokes please disband after the next war tia [/quote] We don't even make jokes about it. It's just what it's called in the charter. We have redefined the word erection to mean an event where certain members of the community are lifted up to positions of honor in the alliance. We're an incredibly serious group of people and I, for one, resent the idea of such an important and time honored tradition of Farkistan being considered a joke.

[quote name='Tick1' timestamp='1334359659' post='2952548'] Yeah, I don't follow. What are you guys trying to prove? [/quote] Is a tech deal done after the money is sent or after the buyer has received their tech? If the tech dealer received money on the 7th of February then you would expect the deal to last until the ~27th when the tech payment expires and the deal can be renewed. GOONS raided on the 16th when the target was scheduled to send tech to GOONS' blocmates the next day (or the day after that, I'm always fuzzy on expiration dates).

[quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1312665894' post='2773743'] I think you replied to the wrong post there. MK is anything but a TPF spinoff [/quote] Prolly, I think I was looking for someone from PC/NG, dunno how I got you /or I'm just retarded //it's prolly that I'm retarded

[quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1312613797' post='2773408'] Actually, Fark has been the SF alliance we've gotten along with worst for quite some time. As far as we've figured out, Fark partly blames us for them being held down so long in GW2 or something to those effects, IIRC. [/quote] We didn't hate you for being the spinoff of a spinoff of a group of traitorous scum, but it didn't help that we hated TPF for other reasons as well (as a general rule most splitting alliances just inherited the view that we had on their parent alliance until the new alliance starts making waves). Most of it had to do with your guys' attitude on the OWF and in game. It wasn't some sort of active 'Damn those guys in PC, what can we do today to ruin them!' sort of dislike. It was just a normal, everyday 'Those guys are annoying' type of dislike (most alliances have been in this category at some point in time). Our dealings were prolly reflective of that. /and no, Fark isn't a sekrit member of SF that sekritly makes all their decisions //I would need several small towns to be able to count on hand the amount of times Fark and SF have butted heads after and while we were in SF

[quote name='the rebel' timestamp='1312379620' post='2770898'] Just because Fark chose not to prosecute does not change the fact it was a community accepted rogue action, not unless spying on each others nations is now an acceptable thing and not a rogue action? [/quote] Gather intelligence is not automatically a rogue action, spying away a nuke is a rogue action, gather intel is what you do at 2am when you're hammered and think it'll be funny. This is not the first time someone has done this.

If you read the treaty you'll notice that it reads strangely like a detective story and you'd get a strange feeling that it's the same exact treaty that we had with them for a year and a half with the words 'or by choice' thrown in where it talks about military action. These words were chosen very, very carefully in order to change as little as possible in the hi-larious treaty. /know what we call an MDP with criteria? An ODP