Emperor Whimsical Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Penkala' timestamp='1295509966' post='2585901'] We're not crying. We're just disappointed. Disappointed that RoK would choose the instigator of this conflict and an alliance that has not only not defended them in the past, but actively screwed them over in the past, over us. Even if RoK DID think that we acted harshly by declaring war. In the end, Polar instigated this, we responded, and RoK supported the instigators. That's pretty disappointing considering who they are and our history with RoK. Of course there's more to it than that... we haven't always been the best of allies to RoK, i.e. the \m/ spying case... I'm sure all of that factored into RoK's decision as well. But in the end, we feel our record with RoK speaks for itself, and that Polar's record with RoK also speaks for itself. [/quote] What should Rok have done? Prioritize treaties? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omfghi2u2 Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 So much butthurt going on. I love it! -omfg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Emperor Whimsical' timestamp='1295510064' post='2585902'] What should Rok have done? Prioritize treaties? [/quote] [color="#0000FF"]That's what some would have done. But not RoK. Considering how long VE has been allied with RoK, I honestly have no explanation for the shock they seem to be experiencing at RoK defending an ally.[/color] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EgoFreaky Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Good luck Rokkers! Give em hell! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roi Loup Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Penkala' timestamp='1295509966' post='2585901'] Disappointed that RoK would choose the instigator of this conflict [/quote] [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=97316&st=0&p=2582729&hl=lennox&fromsearch=1&#entry2582729"]i believe lennox was actually the instigator[/url]. though ive been wrong before.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Stupid Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 You people are reading too much into this. One treaty partner attacked another one of our treaty partners, and that's fine. However there are two other alliances that attacked our allies, and that isn't fine. See how simple it is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Except if your preference had been clearer, it wouldn't have been an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Stupid Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Antoine Roquentin' timestamp='1295510739' post='2585924'] Except if your preference had been clearer, it wouldn't have been an issue. [/quote] I'm sorry but all anyone had to do was ask. I would have told you on the spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Joe Stupid' timestamp='1295510869' post='2585927'] I'm sorry but all anyone had to do was ask. I would have told you on the spot. [/quote] I have a hard time believing that nobody would ask RoK about their preference in a war between two of their allies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Jones Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Best of luck RoK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Stupid Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1295510982' post='2585930'] I have a hard time believing that nobody would ask RoK about their preference in a war between two of their allies. [/quote] I can't speak for Taut, but I was the only other RC member on IRC constantly for the last 3 days. I was asked plenty of times but not by anyone here who is saying we made it unclear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoFish Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 I'm disappointed in this decision and especially in Rok leadership. That said, I don't much like PC. Have fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Joe Stupid' timestamp='1295511086' post='2585934'] I can't speak for Taut, but I was the only other RC member on IRC constantly for the last 3 days. I was asked plenty of times but not by anyone here who is saying we made it unclear. [/quote] I believe the point they are trying to make is that someone gave VE and company the impression that RoK was not going to enter ... and have now decided to. If that is the case, then that is indeed a pretty crappy thing to do. Edited January 20, 2011 by Van Hoo III Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TypoNinja Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1295508443' post='2585835'] [color="#0000FF"]SF did not even exist as a bloc yet in the first two of those, and in the last one CSN had not yet joined SF. You're silly, Typo.[/color] [/quote] I already addressed that specifically, Polar has been shooting at SuperFriends alliances since before there was a SuperFriends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1295511497' post='2585943'] I already addressed that specifically, Polar has been shooting at SuperFriends alliances since before there was a SuperFriends. [/quote] [color="#0000FF"]Polar was never aiming for those alliances. Only in your fantasy. At the time the future SF alliances were fringe groups on the League/Aegis/whatever side. They were not important enough to be in Polar's sights, even though in some of those wars Polar was not even the main push behind. Bah....Why am I even arguing with you? If you're reaching that far back you're really grasping.[/color] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omfghi2u2 Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1295511497' post='2585943'] I already addressed that specifically, Polar has been shooting at SuperFriends alliances since before there was a SuperFriends. [/quote] That makes as much sense as saying NPO ruined the game of cybernations before there was even a cybernations. -omfg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Joe Stupid' timestamp='1295510699' post='2585922'] You people are reading too much into this. One treaty partner attacked another one of our treaty partners, and that's fine. However there are two other alliances that attacked our allies, and that isn't fine. See how simple it is? [/quote] You are probably wasting your time. OK, not probably, are. The baying mob does not want to interest itself in logic and fact. It is tribal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grossman Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 disgusting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TypoNinja Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='omfghi2u2' timestamp='1295511865' post='2585949'] That makes as much sense as saying NPO ruined the game of cybernations before there was even a cybernations. -omfg [/quote] Not really, since the alliances that make up SF now (and in the past) existed before the SuperFriends bloc did. Its kind of impressive actually, that's years of consistent foreign policy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1295512084' post='2585956'] Not really, since the alliances that make up SF now (and in the past) existed before the SuperFriends bloc did. Its kind of impressive actually, that's years of consistent foreign policy. [/quote] Seriously, have a nice cup of tea and a lie down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timeline Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Grossman' timestamp='1295512058' post='2585955'] disgusting [/quote] Yet you see nothing wrong with the 180 VE has done on what they think is a CB ?, shocking. RoK, good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KainIIIC Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1295512084' post='2585956'] Not really, since the alliances that make up SF now (and in the past) existed before the SuperFriends bloc did. Its kind of impressive actually, that's years of consistent foreign policy. [/quote] Are you now like, the Custodian of SF internal affairs and relations? I'm pretty sure what SF will decide what to do as a bloc on their own.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT Jag Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='Van Hoo III' timestamp='1295511322' post='2585941'] I believe the point they are trying to make is that someone gave VE and company the impression that RoK was not going to enter ... and have now decided to. If that is the case, then that is indeed a pretty crappy thing to do. [/quote]You yourself were going up and down making this implication just yesterday, and it is in fact allegedly the reason you are on the AA you are on right now. And you being who you are, I assume you have your sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 [quote name='JT Jag' timestamp='1295512470' post='2585964'] You yourself were going up and down making this implication just yesterday, and it is in fact allegedly the reason you are on the AA you are on right now. And you being who you are, I assume you have your sources. [/quote] You are a smart individual. And no, I am not being sarcastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Something is rotten in the state of Ragnarok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.