Walker Texas Ranger Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Good times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njndirish Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I may be late to the party, but good to see you back in the thick of things Ivan, the world is truly boring without you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MudBug Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Good Luck my former Emperor and PCIA leader in your new endeavors! I am starting to think of some of my "less savory" members as the Bad News Bears of CN. Kicked around, pushed into corners, possibly inept, possibly nonsociable, but they are mine now and until such time as they give me reason to doubt them I will stand by their side. No, you are confusing those who joined you with Vox leadership. They already own the rights to that title and unlike the Bad News Bears, they won't win anything whatsoever. Again, best wishes with NSO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Good Luck my former Emperor and PCIA leader in your new endeavors!No, you are confusing those who joined you with Vox leadership. They already own the rights to that title and unlike the Bad News Bears, they won't win anything whatsoever. Again, best wishes with NSO! It's actually a federal crime in 86 countries to edit an Ivan Moldavi quote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Specific Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 It's actually a federal crime in 86 87 countries to edit an Ivan Moldavi quote. Just trying to help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njndirish Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 It's actually a federal crime in 86 countries to edit an Ivan Moldavi quote. I thought it was a violation of International, Intergalatic, and Interuniversal law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xerxer Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I thought it was a violation of International, Intergalatic, and Interuniversal law. Last time I checked it was... >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmansfield68 Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Holy Ivan! This is most impressive! It is good to see you, sir. o/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amicus curiae Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Ivan, what a surprise! Did not expected you to return to this realm. I also noticed you are already joined by some old friends. I am pretty sure this new alliance will become a succes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBone Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I find it interesting that the NSO, through comments by both leadership and general membership, assert that no assistance will be rendered to member nations with existing baggage, be it ZI/PZI/etc...and are expected to handle said baggage independent of the NSO. The mere fact that membership is granted, surely opens doors that would otherwise be nailed shut. What alliance leader could possibly view an enemy in the same light pre/post NSO affiliation? Perhaps this is simply a unintended byproduct of the stature of its founder, Mr. Moldavi, and the plethora of famous/infamous individuals who now reside within the dark halls of the NSO, perhaps not so unintended. Regardless of intent, this certainly alters the circumstances surrounding those who would otherwise find themselves in a state of perpetual war. Granted it only opens doors so far, it would seem to be the responsibility of such a member to follow through and gain universal clemency. It will be fascinating to watch this unfold. Anything that ignites interest in this realm of ours should be welcomed....and watched closely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerdge Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 (edited) It's hilarious to read all this CN-lawering over the ZI members of the NSO... "We/they don't assist", "they/we protect from this but not from that", "their role in the alliance is this and it will be that only if another thing happens", etc... The Casus Belli for the Woodstock Massacre was that a low-ranked and inexperienced official of the GPA mistakenly admitted as probationary "affiliate" member, for less than 24 hours, Lord Swampy, an old enemy of the NPO and of Valhalla. Now what is (was?) a GPA "affiliate"? A non-member that may be given protection against Raids, at the complete discretion of the GPA, and that has no possibility to take any political role... NSO's ZI-listed members are certainly been given much more, and there's therefore solid precedent for several alliances to declare war against the NSO. The difference is all political: at the time of the Woodstock Massacre there was the will to attack the GPA, as their (previously, considerable) political capital had been exhausted (for reasons and with manoeuvres that I will not utter here: I won't open that can of worms...) At present the NSO has an evident strong political capital, which can be ascribed only to Moldavi himself. The future - mainly the fruits of this NSO adventure - will tell us what good will come from this way of spending said capital (and how long it will last). The discussion over the nature of the status of the ZI-listed members of the NSO, as it was a matter of "right" or "wrong", is however completely silly and useless. It's quite embarassing (though amusing) to witness it. [Edit:typo] Edited March 7, 2009 by jerdge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solaris Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 It's hilarious to read all this CN-lawering over the ZI members of the NSO... "We/they don't assist", "they/we protect from this but not from that", "their role in the alliance is this and it will be that only if another thing happens", etc...The Casus Belli for the Woodstock Massacre was that a low-ranked and inexperienced official of the GPA mistakenly admitted as probationary "affiliate" member, for less than 24 hours, Lord Swampy, an old enemy of the NPO and of Valhalla. Now what is (was?) a GPA "affiliate"? A non-member that may be given protection against Raids, at the complete discretion of the GPA, and that has no possibility to take any politcal role... NSO's ZI-listed members are certainly been given much more, and there's therefore solid precedent for several alliances to declare war against the NSO. The difference is all political: at the time of the Woodstock Massacre there was the will to attack the GPA, as their (previously, considerable) political capital had been exhausted (for reasons and with manoeuvres that I will not utter here: I won't open that can of worms...) At present the NSO has an evident strong political capital, which can be ascribed only to Moldavi himself. The future - mainly the fruits of this NSO adventure - will tell us what good will come from this way of spending said capital (and how long it will last). The discussion over the nature of the status of the ZI-listed members of the NSO, as it was a matter of "right" or "wrong", is however completely silly and useless. It's quite embarassing (though amusing) to witness it. Different people, different rules. No surprise, no embarrasment. Good luck to your new alliance, Ivan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 The Dark Side Is Quite Yummy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 It's hilarious to read all this CN-lawering over the ZI members of the NSO... "We/they don't assist", "they/we protect from this but not from that", "their role in the alliance is this and it will be that only if another thing happens", etc...The Casus Belli for the Woodstock Massacre was that a low-ranked and inexperienced official of the GPA mistakenly admitted as probationary "affiliate" member, for less than 24 hours, Lord Swampy, an old enemy of the NPO and of Valhalla. Now what is (was?) a GPA "affiliate"? A non-member that may be given protection against Raids, at the complete discretion of the GPA, and that has no possibility to take any political role... NSO's ZI-listed members are certainly been given much more, and there's therefore solid precedent for several alliances to declare war against the NSO. The difference is all political: at the time of the Woodstock Massacre there was the will to attack the GPA, as their (previously, considerable) political capital had been exhausted (for reasons and with manoeuvres that I will not utter here: I won't open that can of worms...) At present the NSO has an evident strong political capital, which can be ascribed only to Moldavi himself. The future - mainly the fruits of this NSO adventure - will tell us what good will come from this way of spending said capital (and how long it will last). The discussion over the nature of the status of the ZI-listed members of the NSO, as it was a matter of "right" or "wrong", is however completely silly and useless. It's quite embarassing (though amusing) to witness it. [Edit:typo] The CB of Woodstock Massacre was just an excuse to attack and remove GPA of #1 spot. Simple like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deSouza Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 The Dark Side Is Quite Yummy. We are known to have the best cookies in the cyberverse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeb the Wise Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 (edited) The CB of Woodstock Massacre was just an excuse to attack and remove GPA of #1 spot. Simple like that. Okay, How am I supposed to forgive and forget when members of the orders herself constantly remind me that the Woodstock massacre was little more than a giant tech raid aimed at removing the GPA from it's #1 spot. No one ever said CN was fair. Good luck to the latest edition to the Orders, though I doubt they need it. *edit: spelling Edited March 7, 2009 by Jeb the Wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Frontier Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 It's hilarious to read all this CN-lawering over the ZI members of the NSO... "We/they don't assist", "they/we protect from this but not from that", "their role in the alliance is this and it will be that only if another thing happens", etc...The Casus Belli for the Woodstock Massacre was that a low-ranked and inexperienced official of the GPA mistakenly admitted as probationary "affiliate" member, for less than 24 hours, Lord Swampy, an old enemy of the NPO and of Valhalla. Now what is (was?) a GPA "affiliate"? A non-member that may be given protection against Raids, at the complete discretion of the GPA, and that has no possibility to take any political role... NSO's ZI-listed members are certainly been given much more, and there's therefore solid precedent for several alliances to declare war against the NSO. The difference is all political: at the time of the Woodstock Massacre there was the will to attack the GPA, as their (previously, considerable) political capital had been exhausted (for reasons and with manoeuvres that I will not utter here: I won't open that can of worms...) At present the NSO has an evident strong political capital, which can be ascribed only to Moldavi himself. The future - mainly the fruits of this NSO adventure - will tell us what good will come from this way of spending said capital (and how long it will last). The discussion over the nature of the status of the ZI-listed members of the NSO, as it was a matter of "right" or "wrong", is however completely silly and useless. It's quite embarassing (though amusing) to witness it. [Edit:typo] Have I told you that I love you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 We are known to have the best cookies in the cyberverse. I prefer the black and white cookie. You get a dark and a light side. Best of both worlds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Okay, How am I supposed to forgive and forget when members of the orders herself constantly remind me that the Woodstock massacre was little more than a giant tech raid aimed at removing the GPA from it's #1 spot.No one ever said CN was fair. Good luck to the latest edition to the Orders, though I doubt they need it. *edit: spelling You don't need forget, you don't need forgive also, this is how things are in CN, unhappyly. All we can do is try change that. And I was talking not as a NpO member but as an ex-GPAer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Okay, How am I supposed to forgive and forget when members of the orders herself constantly remind me that the Woodstock massacre was little more than a giant tech raid aimed at removing the GPA from it's #1 spot.No one ever said CN was fair. I don't really see people constantly reminding anyone, but if you're trying to stick your head in the sand and ignore the fact that 95% of this game runs on personal grudges, vendettas, and self-righteous BS, then you're gonna have a loooooooong day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 The difference is all political: at the time of the Woodstock Massacre there was the will to attack the GPA, as their (previously, considerable) political capital had been exhausted (for reasons and with manoeuvres that I will not utter here: I won't open that can of worms...)At present the NSO has an evident strong political capital, which can be ascribed only to Moldavi himself. The future - mainly the fruits of this NSO adventure - will tell us what good will come from this way of spending said capital (and how long it will last). I think you're missing the REAL truth here -- everyone has their hands full with Jarheads. NSO is pretty much in the clear. But seriously though, I'm not sure if you're complaining about NSO having the ability to pull something like this, or whether you're upset that people get boned for BS reasons all the time. I'd venture to say MHA plays a fairly large role in both cases, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I don't really see people constantly reminding anyone, but if you're trying to stick your head in the sand and ignore the fact that 95% of this game runs on personal grudges, vendettas, and self-righteous BS, then you're gonna have a loooooooong day. Wow... :lol: How true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogenes Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 I don't really see people constantly reminding anyone, but if you're trying to stick your head in the sand and ignore the fact that 95% of this game runs on personal grudges, vendettas, and self-righteous BS, then you're gonna have a loooooooong day. This statement is pretty accurate. Casus belli quite literally is nothing but a means of justifying conflict. What actually sparks conflict, however, can be and generally is something far different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heyman Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 Okay, How am I supposed to forgive and forget when members of the orders herself constantly remind me that the Woodstock massacre was little more than a giant tech raid aimed at removing the GPA from it's #1 spot.No one ever said CN was fair. Good luck to the latest edition to the Orders, though I doubt they need it. *edit: spelling D34th was not a member of the orders during the Woodstock Massacre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted March 7, 2009 Report Share Posted March 7, 2009 It's hilarious to read all this CN-lawering over the ZI members of the NSO... "We/they don't assist", "they/we protect from this but not from that", "their role in the alliance is this and it will be that only if another thing happens", etc...The Casus Belli for the Woodstock Massacre was that a low-ranked and inexperienced official of the GPA mistakenly admitted as probationary "affiliate" member, for less than 24 hours, Lord Swampy, an old enemy of the NPO and of Valhalla. Now what is (was?) a GPA "affiliate"? A non-member that may be given protection against Raids, at the complete discretion of the GPA, and that has no possibility to take any political role... NSO's ZI-listed members are certainly been given much more, and there's therefore solid precedent for several alliances to declare war against the NSO. The difference is all political: at the time of the Woodstock Massacre there was the will to attack the GPA, as their (previously, considerable) political capital had been exhausted (for reasons and with manoeuvres that I will not utter here: I won't open that can of worms...) At present the NSO has an evident strong political capital, which can be ascribed only to Moldavi himself. The future - mainly the fruits of this NSO adventure - will tell us what good will come from this way of spending said capital (and how long it will last). The discussion over the nature of the status of the ZI-listed members of the NSO, as it was a matter of "right" or "wrong", is however completely silly and useless. It's quite embarassing (though amusing) to witness it. [Edit:typo] Double-standards? Here? Excuse me, I'm going to go die of shock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts