AgentChaos Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 considering the majority of your nations are in PM we shall see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warrior Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Have fun GDA. Go get 'em! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Corrupt Teacher Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 considering the majority of your nations are in PM we shall see  Well then I'm sure your fine group of well build nations will have an easy time mopping up our nations not in peace mode then. I mean if you can find any slots considering we're hit by 22 alliances...(oh they got in 20 wars) well that's just depressing for the other 22, so welcome and kiss that infra good-bye because it will be leaving quickly and GDA can then go back to being completely irrelevant. :smug: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 (edited) Welcome to the fray and hf! Honest question, what's all the fixation with 22 or 23 group of alliances hitting you..I mean you've done that several times in the past yourself. Edited February 14, 2013 by shahenshah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterfod Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Well then I'm sure your fine group of well build nations will have an easy time mopping up our nations not in peace mode then. I mean if you can find any slots considering we're hit by 22 alliances...(oh they got in 20 wars) well that's just depressing for the other 22, so welcome and kiss that infra good-bye because it will be leaving quickly and GDA can then go back to being completely irrelevant. :smug:  I know right? I mean, you guys basically sent us an invitation (via our hot friend MCXA) and then we get stood up.  Worst Valentines day ever :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoADarthCyfe6 Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 No matter how much fresh crap you add onto the crap pile, it's still going to be crap. Luckily this is the kind that won't stink very long.Have fun, TLR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Corrupt Teacher Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 (edited) didn't mean to post that on this forum my bad. Edited February 14, 2013 by The Corrupt Teacher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarcine1221 Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 didn't mean to post that on this forum my bad. "Your spies returned home unharmed and unidentified"  False.  :P I will have you know that once my agents are done counting to potato and watching Jersey Shore they will be writing an angry letter to your agency! It may or may not be disturbingly similar to that of the UN's letter to DPRK (which was fantastically effective as you all can see). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hombre de Murcielago Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 didn't mean to post that on this forum my bad.   master of espionage :facepalm: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Corrupt Teacher Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 master of espionage :facepalm:  You know me. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Well then I'm sure your fine group of well build nations will have an easy time mopping up our nations not in peace mode then. I mean if you can find any slots considering we're hit by 22 alliances...(oh they got in 20 wars) well that's just depressing for the other 22, so welcome and kiss that infra good-bye because it will be leaving quickly and GDA can then go back to being completely irrelevant. :smug:Just an observation, but I count 6-7 alliances that have hit TLR or vice versa, not 22. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Just an observation, but I count 6-7 alliances that have hit TLR or vice versa, not 22. Dude, you cannot have it both ways. If 6 or 7 alliances hit us based on "An attack on one is an attack on all"... then by your own coalitions definition, you have 22 alliances on us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Dude, you cannot have it both ways. If 6 or 7 alliances hit us based on "An attack on one is an attack on all"... then by your own coalitions definition, you have 22 alliances on us.To be fair, if you want to include the rest of the Equilibrium Coalition in the count of who is "hitting" you, then you also need to include the count of the rest of your coalition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverlordShinnra Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 How very brave of you GDA. You are only a month late. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 To be fair, if you want to include the rest of the Equilibrium Coalition in the count of who is "hitting" you, then you also need to include the count of the rest of your coalition. What are you babbling about? 22 alliances (I believe was the number) signed the document DoW on ODN and INT stating that defensive attacks on one was to be considered a war on all.  I am referring specifically to that DoW and their subsequent handling of the war. I know this is hard for you so I will go slow. Your coalition now recognizes that 23 alliances in your coalition are in hostility with TLR. Do you need stick men and diagrams? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Brandon Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 You are nothing more than glass, waiting to be smashed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 What are you babbling about? 22 alliances (I believe was the number) signed the document DoW on ODN and INT stating that defensive attacks on one was to be considered a war on all. Â I am referring specifically to that DoW and their subsequent handling of the war. I know this is hard for you so I will go slow. Your coalition now recognizes that 23 alliances in your coalition are in hostility with TLR. Do you need stick men and diagrams?No, I understand that is how you want to spin it, though you will also note that my comment was in reference to alliances "hitting" TLR which suggests actively engaged alliances. I am pointing out that it is not simply TLR v 22 as the original comment implied, given those 22 are also engaged with other alliances. These numbers only work from a coalition perspective, and even then the number of alliances is irrelevant relative to other tier statistics (as you well know). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 No, I understand that is how you want to spin it, though you will also note that my comment was in reference to alliances "hitting" TLR which suggests actively engaged alliances. I am pointing out that it is not simply TLR v 22 as the original comment implied, given those 22 are also engaged with other alliances. These numbers only work from a coalition perspective, and even then the number of alliances is irrelevant relative to other tier statistics (as you well know). Â How do you say with a straight face that "that is how I want to spin it".... those in question have been VERY adamant that exactly what I said.. is exactly the case. I know its important for the self-esteem of the pile of crap aligned against us, that it be presented as something other than an already overwhelming advantage , but you are trying too hard, and are missing the forest because those silly trees are in your way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarcine1221 Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 You are nothing more than glass, waiting to be smashed. Dude, your so deep right now that I cant even see you anymore. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wes the wise Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Do you need stick men and diagrams? That would actually help some of our guys. Draw that up and have it on my desk in the morning, please. :P Â Honestly though, have you guys ever sat back and thought about the things that have been done over the years, play connect the dots, and see how it got to this point now? You gotta figure, 23 AA's with hostilities toward a handful, you must have done something to earn it. To piss off that many people is slightly impressive, a little amusing, and quite disappointing... because, some of you guys used to be pretty good folks. Some of you still are. Once this is over I sincerely hope people can hit the reset button and try again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubaQuerida Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Let this be a shining example of what happens to your top tier when you bring inferior firepower to a big gun fight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jgoods45 Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 That would actually help some of our guys. Draw that up and have it on my desk in the morning, please. :P Â Honestly though, have you guys ever sat back and thought about the things that have been done over the years, play connect the dots, and see how it got to this point now? You gotta figure, 23 AA's with hostilities toward a handful, you must have done something to earn it. To piss off that many people is slightly impressive, a little amusing, and quite disappointing... because, some of you guys used to be pretty good folks. Some of you still are. Once this is over I sincerely hope people can hit the reset button and try again. Â I know, I know, I am a good guy. :)Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 (edited) How do you say with a straight face that "that is how I want to spin it".... those in question have been VERY adamant that exactly what I said.. is exactly the case. I know its important for the self-esteem of the pile of crap aligned against us, that it be presented as something other than an already overwhelming advantage , but you are trying too hard, and are missing the forest because those silly trees are in your way.Of course this side has a numbers advantage, though that advantage is mainly distributed through the middle and lower tiers as your side likes to point out. My point is that the advantage is not anywhere near the 22:1 advantage suggested, nor is it 22:4 if the rest of C&G is included, or 22:5 including NG (with NoR also on RIA), given that many (or most) of the 22 are also engaged across other fronts, and the alliances are of different sizes. Across the coalition, the advantage based on the number of alliances is roughly 50:18, though better stats would include the number of nations (rather than alliances), and the distribution of tiers. So, yes there is an advantage, but suggesting that it is TLR v 22 significantly overstates that advantage. Edited February 14, 2013 by Sir Humphrey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tequila Mockingbird Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 This will be fun to watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercoolyellow Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Dude, you cannot have it both ways. If 6 or 7 alliances hit us based on "An attack on one is an attack on all"... then by your own coalitions definition, you have 22 alliances on us.Well if you're going to count it that way, then you have 49 alliances on you. Learn to count dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.