King Brandon

Glad this is up

I can agree with this list

Azaghul

No one needs to fake stats to smear IRON, everyone knows you suck. You'd lose to any decent alliance no matter if you outnumbered them or were even.

This is from the Alliance that lost more members being on the winning side, than even the losers during grudge. I forgot how many but it was so ridiculous that we kept track of it at MK. So don't mistake your damage from fighting your members just fled...

We should just add most of NPO's allies just before Karma.

People don't realize the point of GOONS if they're on the list..

You were fighting ONE alliance of similar size to your own, Because you know nobody could counter you... and you still lost.

Says the alliance that has NPO save them from getting decimated, through NPO threatening to jump sides due to a few members joining from Umbrella and attacking you.

Wow, I didn't think I'd get my own topic I'm honored.

Always good to see two friends becoming friends.

Because i'm sure you've had great luck with those treaties? Anyways Marx stop being a drama queen we all knew that AI and company had drawn up a sizable coalition, no one should have doubted that. It was the whole reason we gave the ok for Umbrella to give a CB since at the time we were at the peak of our strength, and we had the maximum support we would get at the time. If you recall we really wanted to roll AI.

You stayed for far too long, while your reign basically exhibited everything not to do.

You realize aid slots doubling did nothing right? It gave no one any advantage, the only thing that changed is that people that are completely dead weight just fall further behind. While everyone else still grows at the same ratio to one another. Yes it's faster to rebuild after getting beaten, but those who dealt the beaten are also building stronger faster. So it's basically all relative.

Yes it was/is... How do you think it happened? If you actually participate in every global war and get beaten in a certain range over and over again it creates a tier disparity.

1. Wars are not inconclusive, and the tier disparity is a direct result to counter that concept. The fact that a lot of alliances are completely restricted from building an upper tier due to the destruction they will receive in war is a win. the opposite is not so much, as you can rush your smaller nations into the upper tier, while the others simply try their hardest to strengthen what they believe to be "their advantage." This is in addition that a lot of alliances with upper tiers don't recruit at all anyways. 2. None of those are reasons why wars don't happen, it's that there are a dwindling amount of players actually capable of leading a war. I'm sure at this point all of them are in a somewhat tentative agreement that they're pretty sick of the task. The thing about keeping a long term sphere is that you have to keep the rabble happy, and sometimes you just get fed up with their stupidity. So until new players decide it's time to start making ties based solely becuase we're friends and we want to SURVIVE, and not that we're friends with similiar objectives things wont change.

All good! ty

Pink team finally has some love, we have +1 aid slots and -5% infra upkeep reduction. Importing an extra 300 tech beats any possible income gains :3

Now the people that won the senate race in the previous term hold the seat for 30 days, You may have noticed senators have a medal on their nations. http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=134818

colleges have too many ips for anyone to ever get the same, and it's not like it isn't happening now. So it's obviously fine.

5. It's vague are you saying that Player K is paying for the tech deals for the other one if so it's cheating... All the others are not cheating though so long as they don't directly war each other. yolo swag has the only legit one, but i'd still go with cheating.

wtf is everyone here just being obtuse? Admin said in the update that you basically just can't aid each other in any way. So the only thing you can't do is literally send aid to nation A -> Nation B (off network) -> Nation C beyond the obvious direct aiding. But if Nation A and C are both doing tech deals with B it's fine. I don't think donating even matters don't see why he would limit that of all things, come on lets get serious here...

10k posts and I don't think any of them have been good..

Good to see friends becoming friends too :3

nvm just realized this was TE..