Jump to content

An Argent Announcement


janax

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1327818059' post='2909244']
I haven't approved any strikes on Argent so you all can just perish the thought.
[/quote]

I too look forward to a day where our influence is minimized. That day was yesterday. Probably today too. Most days, to be fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1327809159' post='2909160']
Not really privy to GPF's history but several people have dibs on rolling Argent. We would be very frustrated if strangers invited themselves to the party.
[/quote]
We would be frustrated too. Haven't had a good war in a while.

[quote name='LegendoftheSkies' timestamp='1327831282' post='2909359']That said, the threats coming from irrelevant non-alliances in this thread is truly amusing.[/quote]
Truth. I think the combined NS of all the alliances threatening GPF might be less than my NS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='chaosclanlord' timestamp='1327809116' post='2909158']
I for one know that GPF does things that make people want to test this treaty all the time. It's only a matter of time before they piss off the wrong alliance.
[/quote]

Quit hating and do something productive. Your insults are lame and we could care less about what you or anything think about us. Please just stop :wacko:

Glad this has been done :awesome:

o/ GPF
o/ Argent :wub:

Edited by Swatch0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Swatch0' timestamp='1327849273' post='2909425']
Glad this has been done :awesome:

[quote name='chaosclanlord' timestamp='1327809116' post='2909158']
I for one know that GPF does things that make people want to test this treaty all the time. It's only a matter of time before they piss off the wrong alliance.
[/quote]

Quit hating and do something productive. Your insults are lame and we could care less about what you or anything think about us. Please just stop :wacko:

o/ GPF
o/ Argent :wub:
[/quote]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Garion' timestamp='1327844641' post='2909398']
Congrats, GPF. You gained a solid protector here. Now best thing you can do is getting rid of WANA.
[/quote]

He got mad when I told him ever since karma (atleast that's when I got into the game) the wars have been revolving around the Orders and he left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='chaosclanlord' timestamp='1327808620' post='2909146']
Couldn't say I didn't see it coming. And I really couldn't say I think it's a wise idea, but oh well it's not up to me.
[/quote]



You shouldn't run your mouth too much sir.



o/ GPF
o/ Argent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='LegendoftheSkies' timestamp='1327831282' post='2909359']
I wouldn't be surprised if these guys ended up being more trouble than they were worth, but I wish our allies luck anyway.


That said, the threats coming from irrelevant non-alliances in this thread is truly amusing.
[/quote]

So far, the only trouble has been owing people a whole 200 tech and talking bad about them (oh noes!) and telling people to stay out of their part of the communications web (ooc: IRC).

Now, I may be a dirty psuedo-moralist, but these aren't valid CBs in my opinion, especially when the tech was worked out.

If people (Kaskus) decide to test the treaty, well, I guess that's their choice. If they decide to call in a bunch of secret treaties, also their choice. My suggestion would be to drop it personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='janax' timestamp='1327861527' post='2909561']
So far, the only trouble has been owing people a whole 200 tech and talking bad about them (oh noes!) and telling people to stay out of their part of the communications web (ooc: IRC).

Now, I may be a dirty psuedo-moralist, but these aren't valid CBs in my opinion, especially when the tech was worked out.

If people (Kaskus) decide to test the treaty, well, I guess that's their choice. If they decide to call in a bunch of secret treaties, also their choice. My suggestion would be to drop it personally.
[/quote]


Your moralism shames us all sir. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='janax' timestamp='1327861527' post='2909561']
So far, the only trouble has been owing people a whole 200 tech and talking bad about them (oh noes!) and telling people to stay out of their part of the communications web (ooc: IRC).

Now, I may be a dirty psuedo-moralist, but these aren't valid CBs in my opinion, especially when the tech was worked out.

If people (Kaskus) decide to test the treaty, well, I guess that's their choice. If they decide to call in a bunch of secret treaties, also their choice. My suggestion would be to drop it personally.
[/quote]


Your moralism shames us all sir. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...