Cairna Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 [img]http://images.wikia.com/cybernations/images/d/da/Flag2b.jpg[/img] Fulfilling bureaucratic procedures. Something something war. Peace mode, peace mode. MK, we are coming for you. Probably not for a while though, I wouldn't worry about it. Following this announcement, CD is a puppet state of NSO and its leader Ivan Moldavi. There will be no further announcements from myself, or CD's "leader" ( haha!). We'll probably also ditch the flag and like put a lightsaber on or something. Nobody in CD even likes ponies. Also we're not going to fight you guys until you give away your tech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 very interesting announcement Cairna. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyroman Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 I didn't want to have to say this... but I like ponies. I don't like what mushrooms do to CD's ponies though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cairna Posted March 7, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 [quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1299477801' post='2655097'] very interesting announcement Cairna. [/quote] Mogar, don't even try. I first'd this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 [quote name='Cairna' timestamp='1299477879' post='2655100'] Mogar, don't even try. I first'd this thread. [/quote] OP can't inb4, obviously, learn the rules of the internets! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fyfe XIV Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Oooh not making sense, so indie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardonic Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 this is dumb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowbound Milk Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Solid effort for making sense. Whatever this means, I approve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cairna Posted March 7, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1299478328' post='2655106'] this is dumb [/quote] Do you know who I am? Nobody outstupids CD. Nobody. Edited March 7, 2011 by Cairna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Ilyani Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 (edited) Lay off of the hard drugs. Edited March 7, 2011 by Bob Ilyani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmia Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 That flag is still one of the best on Planet Bob. It'd be a shame to get rid of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Puppets? Yay, Count me in! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Have fun CD, Pyro i want to raid you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyroman Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 [quote name='Bob Ilyani' timestamp='1299478661' post='2655113'] Lay off of the hard drugs. [/quote] <&Cairna> i need to lay off the liquor but it would get in the way of my cocaine habit I thought it was bad advice anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KainIIIC Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 no Carpe Diem announcements are allowed to be done without the significant influence of alcohol. o/ CD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoFish Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 waht is this i don't even- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stetson76 Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Welcome to the fray! (I think.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 I can't figure out which is dumber, this declaration, NSO's fake DoW in your name, or the fact that you are breaking surrender terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3nowned Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 I really don't get this announcement, but from the warscreens, it appears CD is (late in) DoWing MK? Also, nice blitz :v Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Last Imperial Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1299481681' post='2655200'] I can't figure out which is dumber, this declaration, NSO's fake DoW in your name, or the fact that you are breaking surrender terms. [/quote] We didn't brake terms as you guys had nations attack NSO with out being at war with them (as not DoW was posted in defense of anyone against NSO), and just like they (NSO) posted a week or two ago, those attacks made this a Defensive war for NSO as MK war the aggressor in attack NSO nations........ So that means we followed the terms to the letter and will defend our allies in this unwarranted attack by MK, any alliances have a problem with it please feel free to come to our IRC Channel and talk to me about it and the rest of CD Gov. will get your message as well, I will be on for another 2 hours, after that you will have to wait till Bionic redhead gets on Edited March 7, 2011 by The Last Imperial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 [quote name='The Last Imperial' timestamp='1299482608' post='2655209'] We didn't brake terms as you guys had nations attack NSO with out being at war with them (as not DoW was posted in defense of anyone against NSO), and just like they (NSO) posted a week or two ago, those attacks made this a Defensive war for NSO as MK war the aggressor in attack NSO nations........ So that means we followed the terms to the letter and will defend our allies in this unwarranted attack by MK, any alliances have a problem with it please feel free to come to our IRC Channel and talk to me about it and the rest of CD Gov. will get your message as well, I will be on for another 2 hours, after that you will have to wait till Bionic redhead gets on [/quote] [quote name='your surrender terms']The parties of NV, GLOF, WAPA, Colossus, Quantum, AB, CD, TFD, NATO, TNG, TPC, and DDM agree to not re-enter on any point in the current conflict surrounding NpO or NPO.[/quote] Say what you want about not posting a declaration of war but you're either incredibly stupid or being deliberately obtuse if you really believe that our attacks on NSO nations weren't a part of the conflict surrounding NPO. I'm going for deliberately obtuse though your other actions could suggest just being stupidity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President S O Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 The nuke symbol and skull is an addition to the flag? Best of luck with whatever you're doing, CD o/ Pyro. o/ BR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Last Imperial Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1299483130' post='2655213'] Say what you want about not posting a declaration of war but you're either incredibly stupid or being deliberately obtuse if you really believe that our attacks on NSO nations weren't a part of the conflict surrounding NPO. I'm going for deliberately obtuse though your other actions could suggest just being stupidity. [/quote] I see you took only a part of what it really said, the part that makes you look right, it also stated that if one of our allies in this war still is attack after the date it was signed that we are free to re-enter on behalf of our allies, which is what we are doing. If MK was including NSO in there original DoW then why was NSO not stated in it..... what it looks like to me is your trying to bend the truth to be in your favor, when we both know that your attack on NSO were in the wrong, and maid MK the aggressor in this war, which lets us enter the war with out braking terms, if you didnt want to fight us you should of stuck to attacking those alliances you DoW on and not NSO Edited March 7, 2011 by The Last Imperial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 [quote name='The Last Imperial' timestamp='1299484970' post='2655247'] I see you took only a part of what it really said, the part that makes you look right, it also stated that if one of our allies is in this war still and is attack after the date signed that we are free to reenter on behalf of our allies, which is what we are doing, if MK was including NSO in there original DoW then why was NSO not stated in it..... what it looks like to me is your trying to bend the truth to be in your favor, when we both know that your attack on NSO were in the wrong, and maid MK the aggressor in this war, which lets us enter the war with out braking terms, if you didnt want to fight us you should of stuck to attacking those alliances you DoW on and not NSO [/quote] It said nothing about "in this war still", it pretty clearly meant conflicts not pertaining to this one. As for NSO, what difference does it make if we posted a declaration of war or not? It makes no difference in your argument, declaration of war or no the attacks on NSO were obviously connected to the conflict surrounding NPO. And we would be the "aggressor" either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1299485766' post='2655256'] It said nothing about "in this war still", it pretty clearly meant conflicts not pertaining to this one. [/quote] If the clause was intended to refer to conflicts not pertaining to this one, then why was it added to the same clause? Further, why was it even necessary to specify something that would have been obvious anyway (i.e. that alliances can defend their allies against unrelated attacks)? Edited March 7, 2011 by Sir Humphrey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.