Jump to content

GOONS Policy Change


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='CEverettKoop' timestamp='1289270386' post='2507023']
The fact that the OWF likes this makes me hate it.
[/quote]

Shall I complain to make you feel better? :P

Anyway, :salute: to GOONS. I hope this hasn't been too controversial over there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What in the world have you done to my GOONS!?

Now what am I supposed to do when I do all nighters and sit in the GOONS channel and watch people come in and cry about being tech raided?

This is an outrage. I do not approve of these changes.

Oh My Dear Sweet GOONS,
What have I done to wrong you?
My heart sinks for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Sargun' timestamp='1289269159' post='2506973']
If someone raids a target that has 15+ members or treaties/protection, can the target/his alliance respond appropriately without going through GOONS channels since it's automatically not approved?
[/quote]
You have no idea how amusing I find this post. And no, I legitimately don't mean that in an insulting way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='SirWilliam' timestamp='1289272700' post='2507117']Right. I only do as MK instructs.[/quote]
So you will stop tech raiding and be like NPO, like you said in response to my Comrade? And what has MK to do with this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Beefspari' timestamp='1289272469' post='2507103']
You have no idea how amusing I find this post. And no, I legitimately don't mean that in an insulting way.
[/quote]

I have to agree that this is amusing to see alliances tremble in your presence again.

As you clearly know (judging by what I suspect to be the source of your amusement), once upon a time in real alliances, unprovoked attacks were declared on without hesitation to keep whatever negotiations might ensue honest. <i>Then</i> reps or member-booting discussions took place.

Alas, remember how even the GPA used to handle <b>any</b> single allied nation that hit it? How weak-willed today's alliances have become. :)

As for the policy change, I think it has been this policy for quite some time in practice. So, congrats on making it public and thanks for sharing it with us in print.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jay Z' timestamp='1289273624' post='2507151']
Well done, for what its worth, as far as I'm concerned, this is enough. I have nothing against GOONS anymore. :)
[/quote]

This is unacceptable. We need to change this before the end of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bavaricar' timestamp='1289273686' post='2507153']
I have to agree that this is amusing to see alliances tremble in your presence again.

As you clearly know (judging by what I suspect to be the source of your amusement), once upon a time in real alliances, unprovoked attacks were declared on without hesitation to keep whatever negotiations might ensue honest. <i>Then</i> reps or member-booting discussions took place.

Alas, remember how even the GPA used to handle <b>any</b> single allied nation that hit it? How weak-willed today's alliances have become. :)

As for the policy change, I think it has been this policy for quite some time in practice. So, congrats on making it public and thanks for sharing it with us in print.
[/quote]
I wish I knew what you were talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...