MadScotII Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 OK so these stats only take in the top 140 alliances but uses stats for those 140 that include alliances outside the 140... Also Bud - you sizist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilCam Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Great post! Thanks for the stats! I'm very proud of our alliance. o7 Echelon! 2.16 wars/member! Personally, I have 6 wars going! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chefjoe Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Once again #1 in total wars per. Nice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seipher Caim Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 It seems our front is doing it right... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 I cant believe it has not been said yet, so I will say it. These stats, coming in the 2nd week of war when much of TOP-IRON-CnG and company are in nuke anarchy and can only defend till that situation ends, means very little. Of course all the AAs who have DOW'd in the last 7 days are going to have excellent offensive war stats...because...you know...they are like able to declare wars. I suppose these numbers are cute to look at and all....but they are, in no way, indicative of any alliance's involvement in the war at this time, they are indicative of who is burning through nuke anarchy more than the others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seipher Caim Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='Rush Sykes' date='10 February 2010 - 04:56 AM' timestamp='1265774184' post='2171788']they are indicative of who is burning through nuke anarchy more than the others. [/quote] So i'll repeat it again... It seems our front is doing it right... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterChief Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Go Corporation! WOOOO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='Rush Sykes' date='10 February 2010 - 03:56 PM' timestamp='1265774184' post='2171788'] I cant believe it has not been said yet, so I will say it. These stats, coming in the 2nd week of war when much of TOP-IRON-CnG and company are in nuke anarchy and can only defend till that situation ends, means very little. Of course all the AAs who have DOW'd in the last 7 days are going to have excellent offensive war stats...because...you know...they are like able to declare wars. I suppose these numbers are cute to look at and all....but they are, in no way, indicative of any alliance's involvement in the war at this time, they are indicative of who is burning through nuke anarchy more than the others. [/quote] I think it had been said, and your argument does hold weight. I know personally that after about two days of war on the TOP/IRON CnG front there would have been numerous nations involved in 5 to 6 wars. Taking into account PM nations would still leave that average relatively high. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eztoindajar Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 you gave =Lost= 0 wars.... that doesn't sound right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneBallMan Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 This, frankly, is awesome work. The trendline in this will also be interesting. Great, great work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drostan Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 I hate to toot our own horn... Just kidding, I love it! We're a small alliance, but we go all in when we go. All other crap aside, we will not hesitate to nuke and be nuked in kind. That being said, it's easy to have good stats with only 30 members. It'd be more sad if we didn't than impressive that we do. Nevertheless, we're awesome, and you're jealous! [img]http://vampster.com/images/cdreviews/Kronos-Titan.jpg[/img] o/ death, pestilence, and famine! Also Kronos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WcaesarD Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='Buds The Man' date='09 February 2010 - 01:04 PM' timestamp='1265738665' post='2170829'] Hellz yeah o/ Val oly OMFG BAPS o/ DT NOR FAN PC [/quote] o/ Valhalla It's nice to fight against some folks who enjoy the fire, explosions, carnage, etc. Not to mention against guys who are so recklessly destructive that they fight more wars/member than any other group. If only I could have filled my 6th slot against you. Pesky anarchy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Style #386 Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='Rush Sykes' date='09 February 2010 - 10:56 PM' timestamp='1265774184' post='2171788'] I cant believe it has not been said yet, so I will say it. These stats, coming in the 2nd week of war when much of TOP-IRON-CnG and company are in nuke anarchy and can only defend till that situation ends, means very little. Of course all the AAs who have DOW'd in the last 7 days are going to have excellent offensive war stats...because...you know...they are like able to declare wars. I suppose these numbers are cute to look at and all....but they are, in no way, indicative of any alliance's involvement in the war at this time, they are indicative of who is burning through nuke anarchy more than the others. [/quote] It was indeed mentioned earlier. Hopefully we'll get fresh numbers to mull over when people on both sides of the central front come back in for Round Two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='Style #386' date='10 February 2010 - 11:44 AM' timestamp='1265820282' post='2172734'] It was indeed mentioned earlier. Hopefully we'll get fresh numbers to mull over when people on both sides of the central front come back in for Round Two. [/quote] I fully intend to add 3 to MK's total in a few days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chefjoe Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='WCaesarD' date='10 February 2010 - 08:24 AM' timestamp='1265819099' post='2172705'] o/ Valhalla It's nice to fight against some folks who enjoy the fire, explosions, carnage, etc. [b]Not to mention against guys who are so recklessly destructive that they fight more wars/member than any other group[/b]. If only I could have filled my 6th slot against you. Pesky anarchy. [/quote] Why TY. We knew going in fighting FAN was going to be a great time had by all. As for our war style of destruction, what do ya expect from a bunch of drunken viking out for a pillage? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashoka the Great Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 Pleased to see that the members of Nordreich are pulling their weight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChimpMasterFlash Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 possible to get an update to these stats? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Curzon Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) ouch cold. Also, well done Val o/ Edited February 11, 2010 by Lord Curzon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Carter Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 [quote] Offensive Offensive No Ranking Members War War/Member Alliance 1 115) 24 36 1.50 OMFG 2 94) 32 46 1.44 Kronos[/quote] If we have to be in 2nd, at least it's to a quality group like OMFG . Also Valhalla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masterof9puppets Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 #2 for offensive...awwww yeaa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamuella Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 any chance of these being updated? Us stat nerds need our fix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 [quote name='Lamuella' date='11 February 2010 - 01:07 PM' timestamp='1265915227' post='2175259'] any chance of these being updated? Us stat nerds need our fix [/quote] Especially before Argent wars expire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diomede Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 [quote name='Aeternos Astramora' date='11 February 2010 - 07:31 PM' timestamp='1265916713' post='2175294'] Especially before Argent wars expire. [/quote] ^This. Former Cit and all, stat collectors, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcus Bellator Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 I agree, /o update! [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/awesome.gif[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabidman Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 o/ KRONOS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.