Jump to content

TOP Warchests of the war


steodonn

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='Sandwich Controversy' date='30 January 2010 - 10:31 PM' timestamp='1264908702' post='2146418']
Stukov's warchest really is that big, geniuses. Though, it also happens to be a huge outlier and more than twice anyone else in the alliance.
[/quote]

Oh how little do you know. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Sandwich Controversy' date='30 January 2010 - 10:31 PM' timestamp='1264908702' post='2146418']
Stukov's warchest really is that big, geniuses. Though, it also happens to be a huge outlier and more than twice anyone else in the alliance.
[/quote]


The first sentence is true. The second one, completely false.

Edited by Hayzell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Vladimir Stukov II' date='30 January 2010 - 09:09 PM' timestamp='1264907383' post='2146357']
[IMG]http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a111/bigdawgcleveland/warchest.png[/IMG]
[/quote]


Back where I come from, they call that a "shower warchest."

Think about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in TOP and left just after I found out we'd back IRON in WWE. I checked all their warchests from the pre-war sign-ins.

[b]They aren't as impressive as you'd think.[/b] 25% OF SIGN-INs have under 750m, 65% have around 1.5b (which isn't a lot for their infra size), and you have about 10-15 nations with 3+b. The ones who talk about their warchest are the exception, not the rule people.

I'll also make note that people who sign-in are more active and thus usually listen to warchest guidelines better. I'd say over 50% of TOP doesn't have over 1b even.

tl;dr - TOP's warchests aren't that great for how much they brag about them. Vlad, Bodvar, a few others can brag though. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Steve Buscemi' date='30 January 2010 - 11:25 PM' timestamp='1264911912' post='2146538']
[b]65% have around 1.5b[/b]

I'll also make note that people who sign-in are more active and thus usually listen to warchest guidelines better. [b]I'd say over 50% of TOP doesn't have over 1b even[/b].
[/quote]

You must have never signed-in if that's the case. Also, LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tailsk: Total Money: $1,622,409,380
Iron Will: Total Money: $1,100,153,147
Telchar: Total Money: $2,881,968,681

Those are 3/5 I'm at war with, the latter 2 are from a couple days ago.

Edited by Drai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you have >20k tech, there is no real reason to have more than a 2-3 billion warchest. That much will get you through a good six months of war, the end result is the same. That being said, most of the spy reports of TOP's largest nations are in that range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Steve Buscemi' date='30 January 2010 - 11:25 PM' timestamp='1264911912' post='2146538']
I was in TOP and left just after I found out we'd back IRON in WWE. I checked all their warchests from the pre-war sign-ins.

[b]They aren't as impressive as you'd think.[/b] 25% OF SIGN-INs have under 750m, 65% have around 1.5b (which isn't a lot for their infra size), and you have about 10-15 nations with 3+b. The ones who talk about their warchest are the exception, not the rule people.

I'll also make note that people who sign-in are more active and thus usually listen to warchest guidelines better. I'd say over 50% of TOP doesn't have over 1b even.

tl;dr - TOP's warchests aren't that great for how much they brag about them. Vlad, Bodvar, a few others can brag though. :P
[/quote]

Aren't you just so well-informed?

[img]http://cdn1.knowyourmeme.com/i/27005/original/llama-derp-300x225.jpg[/img]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Steve Buscemi' date='30 January 2010 - 11:25 PM' timestamp='1264911912' post='2146538']
I was in TOP and left just after I found out we'd back IRON in WWE. I checked all their warchests from the pre-war sign-ins.

[b]They aren't as impressive as you'd think.[/b] 25% OF SIGN-INs have under 750m, 65% have around 1.5b (which isn't a lot for their infra size), and you have about 10-15 nations with 3+b. The ones who talk about their warchest are the exception, not the rule people.

I'll also make note that people who sign-in are more active and thus usually listen to warchest guidelines better. I'd say over 50% of TOP doesn't have over 1b even.

tl;dr - TOP's warchests aren't that great for how much they brag about them. Vlad, Bodvar, a few others can brag though. :P
[/quote]


So you go from being a dissenter, to a coward that runs into PM against orders everytime we go on alert, to a degenerate with an agenda against us that attempts to put private information out in the public? And then you don't even post accurate information. You're pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Tom Litler' date='30 January 2010 - 09:52 PM' timestamp='1264909971' post='2146471']
What about the warchests of Nordreich? Here's mein warchest.
[/quote]
No way. That can't be possible at your size.

If it is, then my God, you are good at this game.

EDIT: Oh hey, we know how many spies you have. SUCKER!

Edited by Earogema
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Hayzell' date='30 January 2010 - 11:41 PM' timestamp='1264912915' post='2146583']
So you go from being a dissenter, to a coward that runs into PM against orders everytime we go on alert, to a degenerate with an agenda against us that attempts to put private information out in the public? And then you don't even post accurate information. You're pathetic.
[/quote]

I actually typed something approximately like this and instead decided to laugh him off because he's incredibly hard to take seriously anymore. :smug:

Don't let'em get under your skin, Paradoxians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Sandwich Controversy' date='30 January 2010 - 10:31 PM' timestamp='1264908702' post='2146418']
Stukov's warchest really is that big, geniuses. Though, it also happens to be a huge outlier and more than twice anyone else in the alliance.
[/quote]

that is most certainly not true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The nation of Israel

http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=186157

You have just conducted a spy operation against the nation of Nation of Israel. In the attack your spy efforts were successful as your spies were able to gather the following information about the nation:

Desired Religion: Christianity
Desired Government: Totalitarian State
Threat Level: Low
Tax Rate: 30%
Number of Spies: 550
Last Nuke Purchase: 4/7/2009 5:16:30 PM
Last Wonder Purchase: 11/2/2009
Total Money: $29,001,247
Technology: 1,721.69 Levels
Last Bill Payment: 1/27/2010 9:59:14 AM
Trade Partners: Union of Socialists, Ostenteria, Libre, Brfitonia, Chindia
Secret Aid Sent To: None
Total Aircraft: 37
Aircraft Fighter Strength: 243
Aircraft Bomber Strength: 90
Navy Purchases Today: 0
Navy Vessels:
# Corvettes: 0
# Landing Ships: 0
# Battleships: 0
# Cruisers: 0
# Frigates: 0
# Destroyers: 0
# Submarines: 0
# Aircraft Carriers: 0

Your spies returned home unharmed and unidentified.

EDIT: oh and the other 3 I'm fighting I am just spying their money away I havn't succesfully gathered intelligence yet :(

Edited by Jack Diorno
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Steve Buscemi' date='30 January 2010 - 11:25 PM' timestamp='1264911912' post='2146538']
I was in TOP and left just after I found out we'd back IRON in WWE. I checked all their warchests from the pre-war sign-ins.

[b]They aren't as impressive as you'd think.[/b] 25% OF SIGN-INs have under 750m, 65% have around 1.5b (which isn't a lot for their infra size), and you have about 10-15 nations with 3+b. The ones who talk about their warchest are the exception, not the rule people.

I'll also make note that people who sign-in are more active and thus usually listen to warchest guidelines better. I'd say over 50% of TOP doesn't have over 1b even.

tl;dr - TOP's warchests aren't that great for how much they brag about them. Vlad, Bodvar, a few others can brag though. :P
[/quote]

And the sad thing is that I used to really like and respect you, Steve :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...