Aeternos Astramora Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Again with the deflection and attempt at derailing. This is not about TPF at all, and this is the last time that I'll engage this issue directly before clicking that wonderful "ignore posts" button to miss all your attempts at misdirection away from this colossal failure at a smear campaign: "We understand, based on recent actions undertaken by Ragnarok, they they see spying as a crime of serious magnitude; as such, we are confident that quick action will be taken on the matter." From OP. Yes, it is about TPF. Timing of actions means nothing. If I commit an assault then am not caught till after the statute of limitations is up, am I any less guilty? Except this was an action of war made during war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogenes Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 if that multi was 1200 days old, that would have covered his time as Triumvir of RoK. Ragnarok has not existed for 1,200 days. If anything, this serves to further the argument that Ragnarok was not behind rishnokof's spying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mind Virus Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Well this here announcement is certainly delivering. Based on the spirit of this ruleMultiple Forum AccountsWith the exception of moderators, if you are caught with multiple forum accounts, the multiple account(s) will be banned, warn level raised, and your identity will be announced by a moderator to the CN community so rule-abiding players can take IC action against you. Multiple forum account offenders will receive a varying percentage warn level raise and/or a permanent ban on a case-by-case basis. I will confirm that the two nations in question were deleted for being multis. [ooc]Doesn't really apply since he is being accused of having two nations unless he did have 2 forum accounts. But whatever. May I have links to the two forum accounts just because?[/ooc] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 So his multi nation is older than his main nation?That's odd. If you don't like your original nation, you make your improved nation and just keep the older one for fun. My brother didn't like his original nation. He just deleted it before creating his new one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Is it possible this is a legal multi that was grandfathered in when they were legal? If it were legal, it wouldn't have been deleted by the mods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chairman Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 poor RoK... your ultimate plans were looking so good too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 His "multi" is older than his "original"? Oh, now this is just getting pathetically funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Ragnarok has not existed for 1,200 days. If anything, this serves to further the argument that Ragnarok was not behind rishnokof's spying. How? Can you not spy unless your nation is younger than your alliance? What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 I see that now, please see the post I made. Missed that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Eddy Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Rishnokof is younger, and the multi.NATO was spying on RoK and trying to infiltrate NSO and IRON I wish to see an apology from NATO for their spying and attempts to cause havoc in all three alliances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 How? Can you not spy unless your nation is younger than your alliance? What? His multi is older than his RoK nation as well. So Rish is actually the multi, not President Magee. NATO was spying on RoK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardus Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 His "multi" is older than his "original"?Oh, now this is just getting pathetically funny. Clearly it was NATO spying on RoK, as we must assume the elder to be the "original" and thus the beneficiary of acquired information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogenes Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 (edited) How? Can you not spy unless your nation is younger than your alliance? What? How could Ragnarok, as an alliance, be spying before it was conceived? Edited January 1, 2010 by Quiziotle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustakrakish II Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 The difference here is that this was not a government member, and, for all we know, went of their own accord. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFedistan Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 On the contrary, I think this shows RoK has a clear CB against NATO. Magee was only a registered member of NATO for 32 days. Your spin is getting ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nintenderek Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Is it possible this is a legal multi that was grandfathered in when they were legal? Well, considering it was 1200 days old, and I'm 1311 days old and not old enough to have a legal multi, I would guess not, although it actually is possible I may be wrong considering I didn't pay much attention when I first started the game. I'm pretty sure though when I started, multis were illegal, which means they would have been 1200 days ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deth2munkies Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 "We understand, based on recent actions undertaken by Ragnarok, they they see spying as a crime of serious magnitude; as such, we are confident that quick action will be taken on the matter." From OP.Yes, it is about TPF. Like I said, that's not even the issue being addressed here. You're taking one small facet of the OP (a cheap shot at RoK) and turning it into the entire deal, rather than looking at the whole OP. Reading it, evaluating it, weighing the evidence, then coming to a conclusion about the current issue based on what has been presented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyriq Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 That makes me sad to find out that Dr. Dan is gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtheistRepublican Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Please provide a screen shot of the nation before it was deleted stating it's age. It's not that it's impossible, merely that proof of this kind has not been presented yet, and arguing based on innuendo and assumption is never a good way to go. Bill N Ted already did this earlier in the thread. http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa237/B...mageenation.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 If it were legal, it wouldn't have been deleted by the mods. True, but the accusations made in the OP are on the assumption RoK advocated it and no alliance in the OP has proof that this was RoK sanctioned. However in the case of TPF the OP was set in motion by TPF gov. TPF gov should have notified the alliances it surrendered to of the ops it was engaged in. I am also of the belief that this war really was caused by a cat fight out of control...[/ooc] much like the Tiger Woods scandal[/ooc] Actually there are a lot of comparisons that can be made to that situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commisar Gaunt Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Yet another topic filled with baseless accusations, assumptions and other such false leaps of logic. I will no longer hesitate to say that posters on both sides of this argument are clearly brain dead. The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact. Get out while you still can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 If you don't like your original nation, you make your improved nation and just keep the older one for fun. My brother didn't like his original nation. He just deleted it before creating his new one. So for 3 years he kept up two nations flawlessly and was not caught, yet just recently he very conveniently forgot how he'd done it all along and started logging in from the same computer / IP to get deleted and for you to catch him? Wow that's a rock-solid theory right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 (edited) Clearly it was NATO spying on RoK, as we must assume the elder to be the "original" and thus the beneficiary of acquired information. Hey, it's every bit as credible as the thread's OP. Edited January 1, 2010 by Aurion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatmagnus Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Just a clarification, Nintendarek is correct. The Grandfather Rule happened in like March/April of 06, so neither of them reach the age limitation. /me blasts off at the speed of light Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted January 1, 2010 Report Share Posted January 1, 2010 Well, considering it was 1200 days old, and I'm 1311 days old and not old enough to have a legal multi, I would guess not, although it actually is possible I may be wrong considering I didn't pay much attention when I first started the game. I'm pretty sure though when I started, multis were illegal, which means they would have been 1200 days ago. Yeah, I don't remember when that policy was canceled. I know a few NAAC members had legal multi's that they left in limbo most of the time. Except theblitz, he tried to use his for other things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts