Feanor Noldorin Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Gramlins, obviously. I've only read about half this thread and it looks like we have plenty of people to choose from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arwen Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Very interesting stats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youwish959 Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 (edited) Fantastic line!Thank god for threads like these, we need some enemies. They don't want to be on your side. Edited October 13, 2009 by youwish959 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feanor Noldorin Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 They don't want to be on your side. I know. They want to be on the other side and I think that is fantastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabioviejo Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Can we destroy Grämlins now? I mean, we must survive after all? They are #2 in a lot of wonder stats...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildThing Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 I imagine there'll be plenty more of this propaganda in the coming months as they're content to catch us in wonders whilst alienating us from the rest of the world. Then someone will get overly bored, something stupid will happen, and war will break out. Looking forward to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 The best thing is probably that we enjoy showing falsehoods in the so-called prods (more like attempts to insult) from the world at large.Also, you should at least follow Cato a bit better. Citing him once and then forgetting about it is a bit of a misquote, IMO. I'm going to need a lot more than $3 million if you want a sustained campaign for the destruction of TOP. I'm the best rabble-rouser in the business and I ain't cheap. I suppose a lot of that is due to us being a bit more active then the typical alliance and reading the OWF more. That being said I prefer to say we "roar" then gnash teeth or spit venon. Of the many snakes in Greater Doitzel I have yet to encounter any species that roar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 You should look in the grass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilien Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 I'm quite excited to see how this extended snake metaphor gets expanded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcades057 Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 You guys are so cute when you argue amongst yourselves. And it was especially adorable when you were all comparing your casualties earlier. This is what you wanted, Planet Bob. This is the direction you chose. Enjoy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Fingolfin Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 (edited) Wow, I'm just stopping at page 10, don't have time to read through the rest of this mindless drivel. Poor showing Jack, are you really the best Athens has to offer? Zhadum you are not, you are a mere cheap rip off, your jabs are flawed at best as show by countless rebuttals. I'm not going to be naive enough to say that self preservation has not played at least a partial roll in the moves of TOP and others, but it has been clearly stated here that they in no way commited any wrong-doing and in fact moves to distance themselves were under-way for sometime. The baseless attacks of several Sith here are enough to make me laugh, particularly the one about a certain TOP member's ZI'ing in a war 2 years old. The Minister of Peace of NpO actually comes and provides screen shots to ascertain the members story and you just dismiss it and continue on with your mindless babble. Dissapointing, NSO is actually one of my favorite alliances. MK as usual is putting on a lively show of smoke and mirrors and !@#$%^&*. When the next war happens we all know that C&Gs treaties with Citadel are going to be burnt up, perhaps I should make a list then and post cancelled treaties of yours. Although, I'll admit that I respect MK as being able to play the political game well, you make good points at times. Keep it classy Paradoxians and others who are being debased by this rabble. I'll close with a quote from the signature of one of my favorite CN leaders, Chimaera (oh my, Legion gov saying good things about IAA...what has the world come to). You sir, are no leader. You are simply a ball of hubris wrapped in flesh who wishes to be called one. I spit on your name. You know if I'm refering to you. With Kind Regards, LF EDIT: How very dissapointing that I seemed to have arrived late to the party. If anyone wishes to return for witty banter them they are by all means welcome. Edited October 13, 2009 by Lord Fingolfin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythicknight Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 :iceburn: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jer Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 This is what you wanted, Planet Bob. This is the direction you chose. Enjoy. You're right, all of this open hostility and fun is silly and boring. Bring back the NPO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcades057 Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 You're right, all of this open hostility and fun is silly and boring. Bring back the NPO! You had no problem with us for how many years? Don't go waxing all indignant along with the rest, now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jer Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 What? For a long while bashing you guys was pretty much the only thing I did on here, so you're wrong. Regardless, this isn't about you. Your ridiculous post has been dismissed and we can continue on with the festivities without turning this into a discussion about an irrelevant alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcades057 Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 (edited) What? For a long while bashing you guys was pretty much the only thing I did on here, so you're wrong. Regardless, this isn't about you. Your ridiculous post has been dismissed and we can continue on with the festivities without turning this into a discussion about an irrelevant alliance. Uhh, this topic is about TOP, MHA and ODN... Or were you meaning when I brought up STA? Edited October 13, 2009 by Arcades057 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youwish959 Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 I know. They want to be on the other side and I think that is fantastic. You missed it. I was saying that if they were your enemies, you'd switch sides and become their friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidMercury Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 I'm going to need a lot more than $3 million if you want a sustained campaign for the destruction of TOP. I'm the best rabble-rouser in the business and I ain't cheap. Of the many snakes in Greater Doitzel I have yet to encounter any species that roar. It's called a dragon as I believe dragons are subclasses of snakes or wyrm. So yes, I am a dragon. I have fire....and [ooc] chinese food [ooc]. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londo Mollari Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Poor showing Jack, are you really the best Athens has to offer? *Londo smiles slowly Hello, purple. When the next war happens we all know that C&Gs treaties with Citadel are going to be burnt up If this happens, I very much doubt it will be because C&G alliances canceled them. And I doubt it will happen at all. But I'm still not sure how this discussion became about TOP or Citadel when they were just one of many alliances/groups mentioned by this particular experiment in statistics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jer Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Uhh, this topic is about TOP, MHA and ODN...Or were you meaning when I brought up STA? You are just classic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 I have two key comments. First of all, if you look over history, I think NPO would be the clear winner, they cancelled countless treaties to be on top. Their treaties were worth nothing. Second of all, several alliances were practically forced to sign certain treaties, or be curb-stomped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Scian Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Very interesting. o/ Citadel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 (edited) I imagine there'll be plenty more of this propaganda in the coming months as they're content to catch us in wonders whilst alienating us from the rest of the world. Then someone will get overly bored, something stupid will happen, and war will break out. Looking forward to it. Strange. It sounds vaguely familiar, heh eh,..such a repeat gets a bit tired after a while. Though propaganda pictures are getting better over time. Have fun. Btw. Starcraftmazter, you will have to change your tune a little bit. NPO hatin' is 6 months ago, according to experts from relevant alliances NPO is irrelevant alliance now, not worth the trouble. I concur with the experts, I mean reality is what it is. So the tune how NPO suspended/canceled countless treaties with GOONS and NpO, GOONS, NpO, then NpO and GOONS etc., as well as how alliances were bullied to sign treaties is a bit obsolete. As nobody cares for NPO that much any longer, we don't occupy the the TOP (cant resist) like some, or implying how TOP, MHA or Sparta would be curb-stomped (I guess by the "hegemony" right?,...) if not having certain treaties is also,...you know like wut. So yeah, quicker you adapt to the rest of your pack, would be better for you. Just an advice, take it or leave it, regardless of what you do with it, with time you will have to change one way or the other. Take this thread as a start of new things, the old belonging to the past. You cant be a "cool hater" if your not fallowing trends, man. Edited October 14, 2009 by Branimir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryievla Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 Jack, I see by page 10 that our treaty with Polar has been mentioned 3 times. It had a non-chaining clause. They had no obligation towards us, therefore they did not let us down. Yet the incident is still on the OP. Would you mind removing it on your next update? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 (edited) Jack, I see by page 10 that our treaty with Polar has been mentioned 3 times. It had a non-chaining clause. They had no obligation towards us, therefore they did not let us down. Yet the incident is still on the OP. Would you mind removing it on your next update? Dont worry, NpO was not the target of this thread, it is just there to fill the "stats". And also, if he didn't changed it until now, he probably will not, anyway, the thread run its course. Mission accomplished one might say. Edited October 14, 2009 by Branimir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.