sir jesus Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 I can't speak about the other alliances, but as for IRON, the four combatants I faced only strengthened my positive opinion of them. I'd be happy if they payed minimal reps if at all. Sure getting nuked 5 times wasn't fun, but it was certainly worth the 10 I successfully landed. (maybe IRON should be asking reps of they're SDI operators?) My SDI operators did just fine. They will certainly be getting a raise. I've heard a lot of great things about MHA combatants (except the dam )): Vogon poetry )): ) and my gremlin opponents were nothing but fun to combat. I even got congratulated when I won a string of battles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edikroma Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Now we're going to have our slots clogged as well YOU FOOL. It won't be that bad...it would only take.... 27,378,507,871.321 years... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Although seeing as MCXA/OG/NATO/GGA/Valhalla got off with nothing, I don't really see why Echelon should need reps. They're no worse than the previously listed alliances. MCXA and GGA paid reps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pingu Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 I see no particular reason that IRON should be subjected to punitive terms. Similar to GGA, perhaps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninja Colt Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 MCXA and GGA paid reps. Those reps are nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Benji Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 I havn't been around long enough to know. I understand NPO and others have made alliance disband in the past, as part of reps, but yeah. Specific example of harsh reps by NPO Specific example of harsh reps by TPF please. Not doubting you guys, I'm just curious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Conrad Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 MCXA and GGA paid reps. Minimal at best. They were more symbolic than anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gruthenia Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 I havn't been around long enough to know.I understand NPO and others have made alliance disband in the past, as part of reps, but yeah. Specific example of harsh reps by NPO Specific example of harsh reps by TPF please. Not doubting you guys, I'm just curious. TPF and NPO: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=16985 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=32762 NPO: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=32875 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=17871 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 White peace for everyone! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Benji Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 That put's this all in better context now, thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trout Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Hopefully I'm wrong but I get the feeling that their reps will be disappointing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobama Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 TPF and NPO:http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=16985 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=32762 NPO: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=32875 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=17871 Kind of eerie to read them all in order like that. Also, I doubt its an outstanding number now, but when NPO set out reps for Legion in GWIII, I remember jaws dropping at the 800 mil. Someone should make a link list of every surrender thread to NPO and friends. It's borderline disturbing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylar Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 (edited) Kind of eerie to read them all in order like that.Also, I doubt its an outstanding number now, but when NPO set out reps for Legion in GWIII, I remember jaws dropping at the 800 mil. Someone should make a link list of every surrender thread to NPO and friends. It's borderline disturbing. the good old days. hmm are there any wars with legion taking reps(i honestly don't recall) Edited May 22, 2009 by Sylar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Interesting to see some of the signatures on those terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desperado Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 TPF and NPO:http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=16985 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=32762 First is a collective group and second really isn't all that bad. There are some that want to outdue even their own karma allies and set a precedence that hasn't ever been seen before... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 (edited) First is a collective group and second really isn't all that bad. There are some that want to outdue even their own karma allies and set a precedence that hasn't ever been seen before... The first one was a robbery. Reparations for a fabricated offensive war. edit: offensive Edited May 22, 2009 by Sal Paradise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrous Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 well considering TPF pushed NPO to start the war i say light mhawk saved us alot of time and effort on the road to getting rid of the red menace Holy crap. I can't speak for TPF, but are you possibly insinuating that the rest of CN did NOT want a war? Accusing someone of blatant warmongering is one thing, but denying that the whole of CN had been waiting for this war is just naive. At least try to be a little honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 I think reps should be an adequate size. Echelon - Around 100 mill TPF - Around 100 mill, Preferably none, since theyve been very honorable, Awesome, and well just plain Amazing During and Before the war. NPO - Around 500 mill, Theyve sank alot in Size, Dont over flow them. Their just players like you and me even if they are .... Well we wont discuss that here. IRON - Ehm.... 300 mill, Yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 TPF and NPO:http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=16985 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=32762 NPO: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=32875 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=17871 I dunno man there's Karma alliances that took their fair share in those reps. Hell TPF got 14k tech total and VE got 12k in one whack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cncruzore85 Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 100k soldiers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sylar Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 I dunno man there's Karma alliances that took their fair share in those reps. Hell TPF got 14k tech total and VE got 12k in one whack. which is why i go like this every time i see people saying karma is the honorable good guys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 VERY HEAVY. Don't hate me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gears of War Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 I hope to see NPO's reps in the billions of $$$ and hundreds of thousands of tech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 I dunno man there's Karma alliances that took their fair share in those reps. Hell TPF got 14k tech total and VE got 12k in one whack. You 'dunno' what? Whether or not they're harsh reps because...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bjornoya Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 If the alliances of Karma want to distance themselves from the deeds of those they are fighting against, harsh reps would not necessarily bring about the change that they are fighting for. If reps are used they should not be used to target the alliance as a whole, but instead punish the leaderships of said alliances. Reps could specifically target leadership, or part of the reparations could be demanding the resignation of the key players not just of this war, but those who have consistently made poor decisions that corrupted the whole of the CN community. Perhaps force those alliances, if there are any that don't hold elections for leadership to do so so that they can hopefully be self-regulating rather than needing to be regulated by outside forces via war. Reps through money and tech can go so far, but information, and removing failed alliance policies and leaders would do more to benefit the entire community. I guess what I'm trying to say is be creative with reps, not vengeful. Use the victory as a chance to change CN for the better rather than castrate an alliance and arrogantly assume that nothing bad will happen in the future because the enemies of today will be powerless to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.