Jump to content

Ninja Colt

Members
  • Posts

    738
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ninja Colt

  1. These 3 alliances have been sanctioned for more than a few weeks now yet they still don't have their flags displayed on the alliance page: [url=http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_display_alliances.asp?Alliance=RnR]RnR[/url], [url=http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_display_alliances.asp?Alliance=Mushroom%20Kingdom]MK[/url], [url=http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_display_alliances.asp?Alliance=Fark]Fark[/url]. While these 3 formerly sanctioned alliance have been out of the top 12 for weeks and still hold their flags: [url=http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_display_alliances.asp?Alliance=Umbrella]Umbrella[/url], [url=http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_display_alliances.asp?Alliance=The%20Imperial%20Order]TIO[/url], [url=http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_display_alliances.asp?Alliance=Anarchy%20Inc.]AI[/url].
  2. lmao at putting the blame on NPO for not winning the war properly.
  3. wow.. imagine all the roleplaying posts that no longer exist...
  4. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=114848 DBDC is a protectorate of Umbrella as well.
  5. just wanted to point out that earlier today there was a grand total of 3 nations above 130k ns in war mode in all of equilibrium. 46 alliances, 3 nations.
  6. Oh man look at me use large fonts it even comes in red are you all sure you saw me point out this epic fail sig keep trying sparta.
  7. umbrella's only lost about 2,100,000 NS, since they have about 1.5m ns on AA's like DBDC and darkfall. anarchy inc has lost 3,266,000 NS.
  8. yep, you have me truly owned now if only your coalition would actually attack me or even spy me..
  9. With warchests like that, I think we'll be keeping our tech advantage for quite a while.
  10. [quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1357353041' post='3071468'] I gotta say, while I have admired in the past Kaskus tenacity, this is a pile of smug, condescending attitudes trying to mask in intelligence. I honestly thought much better of you than that. I am disappointed I was wrong. [/quote] ie kaskus was cool when they were fighting GOONS with heart. now kaskus is smug and rude for fighting NSO with heart.
  11. [quote name='Letterkenny' timestamp='1354784443' post='3060965'] I can't bear it. "An idiot" not "a idiot" in the signature for D34th. Carry on. [/quote] missing the point
  12. [quote name='Lurunin' timestamp='1353605742' post='3056261'] Coulda sworn the majority of these guys came from TIO [/quote] and your point is?
  13. just because you were able to cower in peace mode doesn't mean the war is peaced out
  14. "MK's camp of terrible posters" lists terrible posters, all opposite camp of MK
  15. [quote name='EgoFreaky' timestamp='1344141238' post='3018720'] Why the rush? Anyway, congrats on peace. [/quote] LimBabwe is a peaceful nation. War is not an option since 6/17/2012. yep good for you
  16. [quote name='President Gunn' timestamp='1340384668' post='2992767'] You disappoint me. You seemed to of forgotten Invicta. [/quote] it wouldn't be the first time invicta has been forgotten
  17. [quote name='jerdge' timestamp='1340176845' post='2989872'] The thing is that everyone making peace mode accusations is doing it just for propaganda. Which is fine and dandy, mind you. No one will let any of their tiers "get eaten alive just yet", by the way: it's really silly to complain that people don't play the game to entertain [i]others[/i]. Bottom line, Peace Mode is a feature of the game. People (on all sides) not wanting it to be used in the games they play should just play another game. [/quote] it's not propaganda when we say we will only negotiate surrender terms once an alliance leader is out of peace mode. there's nothing wrong with going peace mode the first round for a counterattack second round, but when we're looking at alliances that have kept an entire tier of fighters in pm (sparta) throughout an entire war, it'll only cause them harsher peace terms.
  18. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1339748064' post='2984676'] Well I guess that they did it to get Polaris and allies involved? Because with the aggression against CSN they(DH) already guaranteed XX's involvement since R&R is member of both blocs. [/quote] lol implying that polaris is a target for this war
×
×
  • Create New...