Gears of War

That's some brilliant diplomacy on NSO's end.

Wow, we really have reached the bottom of the barrel when it comes to treaty names/themes.

Did the Purple Colony clear this with Pacifca first? I remember when the Green Colony got in trouble for not doing that.

Be careful what you wish for. Pretty much this.

It's sad that this was necessary, but at the same time I'm looking forward to hanging out with all those cool people from GR plus I hear CnG is pretty nifty too.

This statement needs to be part of the foundation of any sound foreign policy.

There would have been no FARK greenlight without the hilarious Norway/Nordreich incident.

Wait, how was NPO's attack on OV revenge?

I'm late to the party, but I would like to say that I think the terms laid out in the OP are well deserved, I very much like those numbers, and I hope they only go higher. Have a great day.

I have never seen the purpose of making a public apology for a something that happened in private. If the offended party considers an apology necessary for a private event, wouldn't it make more sense to have the offender make a thread on the offended party's forums or in the offended party's IRC channel or in a query?

Agora was never going to amount to anything without wider support from ex-BLEU alliances and was obviously just a NPO power grab, so on the one hand good riddance and on another I'm really going to miss the train wrecks that Agora announcements usually ended up as.

I vote for Hitler is a vote for great justice.

So do you ascend via the unjust path? That's a pretty unique way of announcing a treaty I must say. I foresee good things coming from this.

BUT IT HAS A SPELLING ERROR HOW COULD YOU NOT CARE!?!? A big congrats on this treaty guys.

I saw NV's new government and I hizzed in my pants. Congrats guys.

Well played good sir. Hey Echelon, this thread sure did backfire on you, didn't it?

You'd be right except that's not what TOP's claiming to be doing. TOP has accepted hefty reps in the past with no problems, but now that their friends are on the losing side they're trying to claim that reps are immoral across the board and that we are evil from trying to get them. And that is hypocritical.

GOD paid the piper in the UJW, they were nuked without being able to retaliate and had to pay hefty reps. GOD and RoK aren't the one self-righteously strutting around the forums pretending they've never done the things they're now looking down on others for doing. It seems IRON is well aware of who their new masters are.

Explain to me how sending out a PM allowing individuals to surrender is "stooping" to anything? Many would consider that very merciful.

Congrats to our allies in GR and look forward to talking with this "Al" character. What are the duties of the Minister of Trains?

And nothing of value was lost. Congrats to GOD & Company for losing the dead weight.

So your problem with GOD and SF is that they aren't the GPA or TDO? Seriously?

It is actually the opposite of laughable, the war was won long before TOP entered.

If TOP and others had accepted Gen Lee's repeated assertions that their numbers were incorrect in the other thread and had not started spreading those numbers around then this thread would have been completely unnecessary,

So it's a "game" to hold Citadel to the standard it uses for other alliances? Holding Polar responsible for the actions of ES after he was removed is OK, but holding Gre responsible for the actions of government members that resigned is not?