astronaut jones Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 this war is still going on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Un4Gvn1 Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 this war is still going on? We'll be the last off the battlefield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All Your Base Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 I'm glad to see at least the TPF and NV posters here remaining respectful about this and it will be a pleasure helping our good mates in MK out. I hope to have a good time fighting some of TPF's nations out on the playground. We know what it's like to be in the position that TPF is in now after the beating we took from a handful of sanctioned alliances last year. Hopefully the situation can be resolved quickly. See your defensive measures in my inbox soon B) o/ Nueva Vida o/ Mushroom Kingdom o/ The Phoenix Federation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nutkase Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Yeah, cause attacking nations with 3K plus tech, sizable warchests, Manhattan Projects and SDI's is a good chance at free tech.Do you even understand how the game is played? Why don't you have a seat at the kids table and let the adults talk. NV have one nuclear capable nation under 23K, they bring nothing to the table when it comes to defeating those type of nations If anything, you are playing at the kids table Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingSuck Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 give em hell TPF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coven Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Average nation strength is meaningless. The figure of merit is the number of nations able to hit TPF nations in ranges that the alliances already on them might be having trouble with. I'm not going to waste my time on sorting through all of that, but Nueva Vida does have a significant number of nations in the low range (I believe that TPF has ~80 nations below 10K NS, while NV has ~70, for example). As they are playing a support role rather than prosecuting the war on their own, a perfect match-up isn't needed.They have a low number of wars so far because they declared at an odd time. As has been pointed out, a stunning blitz isn't needed - they just want to help hold the staggers. Your point about tacking on to try to milk TPF for some reparations I concede is conceivable in principle, but it is not the case here. Alliances hitting TPF; CCC: Roughly 70 nations 10k strength and under. MK: Roughly 84 nations 10K strength and under. PC: Roughly 23 nations 10k strength and under. FoB: Roughly 74 nations 10k strength and under. Must I continue... Because there are like 12 alliances to go? TPF Nations 10K strength and under: 97 I think we are pretty well covered without NV, none the less, we'll meet you on the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 How many of those are not anarchied, and thus able to declare new wars? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadie Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Awesome. I've been crying on IRC for the last week about us not being declared on in a while. Welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhawk Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Alliances hitting TPF;CCC: Roughly 70 nations 10k strength and under. MK: Roughly 84 nations 10K strength and under. PC: Roughly 23 nations 10k strength and under. FoB: Roughly 74 nations 10k strength and under. Must I continue... Because there are like 12 alliances to go? TPF Nations 10K strength and under: 97 I think we are pretty well covered without NV, none the less, we'll meet you on the field. I'm afraid I must correct you Airikr, they can't cover us well enough until we can each have 6 defensive slots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coven Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 (edited) I'm afraid I must correct you Airikr, they can't cover us well enough until we can each have 6 defensive slots. hahahaha mhawk wins. Edited May 15, 2009 by Airikr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 I think this is more of a 'I want to be in waiting list too'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fupresti Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 NV have one nuclear capable nation under 23K, they bring nothing to the table when it comes to defeating those type of nationsIf anything, you are playing at the kids table I was referring to the fact TPF has the ability to nuke they hell out of the NV lower ranks. Maybe it's time to try and play a new game, here is a suggestion. Get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzelger Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Alliances hitting TPF;CCC: Roughly 70 nations 10k strength and under. MK: Roughly 84 nations 10K strength and under. PC: Roughly 23 nations 10k strength and under. FoB: Roughly 74 nations 10k strength and under. Must I continue... Because there are like 12 alliances to go? TPF Nations 10K strength and under: 97 I think we are pretty well covered without NV, none the less, we'll meet you on the field. Maybe I should have taken the time to go through all that after all. My original point, that average nation-strength is meaningless is still correct though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londo Mollari Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Brah you be helping my brahs. Hawt stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heracles the Great Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Good luck NV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coven Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Maybe I should have taken the time to go through all that after all. My original point, that average nation-strength is meaningless is still correct though. hehe, no worries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Your point about tacking on to try to milk TPF for some reparations I concede is conceivable in principle, but it is not the case here. I look forward to NV's first time offering a white peace in the history of their alliance, then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobama Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Three declarations. So did you do this for attention or to look like good allies? Ironically enough, TPF played this card when they attacked us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vijaya Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 You guys are ! Good luck against your honorable foe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhawk Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Three declarations. So did you do this for attention or to look like good allies?Ironically enough, TPF played this card when they attacked us. Hey, we did manage like 16 wars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vol Navy Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Welcome to the field NV. MK has had an amazing bill reduction program. We will see if yours works out as well as theirs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Blake Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Sad and apparently necessary. I guess Bama is doing more damage than I thought he would Keep up the good work guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toto Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 I was referring to the fact TPF has the ability to nuke they hell out of the NV lower ranks.Maybe it's time to try and play a new game, here is a suggestion. Get it. Wow, it really is called clue over there. I thought Americans were just using shorthand Anyway, I dont really see why NV needs to jump onto us, the war is practically over already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bower3aj Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 I look forward to NV's first time offering a white peace in the history of their alliance, then. It may be true that NV has never offered white peace but I can say that they were not the alliance that requested reps on the MCXA front. They took them when another alliance said that they wanted reps at which point we figured out what reasonable reps would be. but they're total blood hounds. Also, if you think that NV would actually declare war for the benefit of reps than you are sorely mistaken. Even if they do get reps out of this war, I'm sure that the damage delivered by TPFs nukes will outweigh any reps received. So really they're not going to come out of this with victory and free stuff and even stronger than ever. They'll be hurting after this war. K? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Anyway, I dont really see why NV needs to jump onto us, the war is practically over already. Tell that to mhawk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.