Jump to content

KingSuck

Members
  • Posts

    674
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by KingSuck

  1. [quote name='Supa_Troop3r' date='11 March 2010 - 05:36 PM' timestamp='1268329330' post='2222247'] Side note: I don't see what the point of this thread was. Poison clan already stated before this thread, reparations were not going to be paid. So echelon government does what? Post a thread, whining about how ebil Poison Clan is? All this does is try to slander PC and make Echelon out to look like a bunch of cry babies. [/quote] Not really. I for one feel that Echelon has come off very reasonably in this thread whilst PC have looked like incompetent twats (and I'm an avid raider/have always quite liked PC). You may not like it (probably because it's making your MADP partner look like idiots) but I think that bringing the issue to the public eye was one of the more productive moves that Echelon could have made given PC's stubbornness to pay anything as reparations.
  2. [quote name='Titus Pullo' date='08 March 2010 - 10:05 PM' timestamp='1268086217' post='2218354'] stuff [/quote] Will all due respect, Bob Sanders simply made a claim that Sky wasn't a particularly good Emissary. I don't really see the need for this slightly pedantic attempt to prove (as fascinating as it is to read) that, as technically the regent is in charge of all facets of the alliance, every decision/failure must come down to him. Just because the Emissary represents the Regent in foreign affairs does not mean that the emissary is annulled of all responsibility for the handling of said affairs.
  3. You'll find 4 people quadding the same target when [OOC]the target can't be bothered to stay up till 6am for a game they're quitting[/OOC] usually results in a pretty quick anarchy seriously though, congrats again STA
  4. you know, if you want to pressure NPO into taking your ridiculous terms this probably isn't the way to do it
  5. Black: Sparta, Umbrella, GOONS Blue: NpO, NV Aqua: MHA, MK, Gre Orange: IRON, ODN, TOP White: TPF, STA Green: GGA, VE Purple: Valhalla, Invicta, Legion, UPN, BAPS, Olympus, Tempest Maroon: RIA Red: NPO Brown: GATO, NSO Yellow: FAN Pink: PC Multi-Colored/No official Color: MCXA, Grey Council
  6. very impressive. o/ Nordreich o/ TPF o/ TSI
  7. NV are actually a pretty cool alliance from what I've seen, and I don't like too many alliances
  8. is that flag official? Congrats to the new signatories
  9. Congrats TIA, you got yourself some awesome protectors
  10. They didn't honour an agression clause though, they honoured a defensive clause: Sorry but what? I just did a quick skim of the thread and only 4 Valhallans have posted and not one of them said anything close to that.
  11. how many of those alliances were a major part of the 'hegemony'? how many of those 18 alliances held a MDoAP with the NPO until days before attacking? I'm pretty sure Pacifica's members are well aware of the peace terms, and given their posts on these forums recently I'm pretty sure they share a similar view as their gov regarding said peace terms.
  12. I didn't miss anything, Waterana asked you to show her an example of when they've forced an alliance to sacrifice members after peace had been signed. Your 'example' is a threat made to peace mode nations way before peace terms were issued which not only is irrelevant imo due to being completely independent of peace terms but at the same time, as you so kindly pointed out, it never even happened. Using an example of something that Pacifica didn't even do to undermine them is pretty idiotic in my mind
  13. that may be so, but it's still not relevant to Waterana's point
  14. If that's the case then without sounding too condescending; you're an idiot. I know you guys just love to flash that thread around whenever you talk about the NPO but why don't you try and read what Waterana actually said before replying in the future.
  15. not for the people trying to keep the NPO down
  16. I know, but it's unlikely to be as long as FAN had to wait given the current political climate.
  17. FAN were only kept down so long because the NPO was in such a dominant position of power. The alliances fighting NPO are nowhere near that amount of power and the NPO is a lot more powerful than FAN were so I sincerely doubt NPO will have to wait anywhere near that long if that's the route they choose to go.
  18. oh come on. PZI for gov was extremely rare, you guys had nothing to do with getting rid of viceroys (that was admin), forced disbandments were even rarer than PZI for gov (and your alliance was involved in the only case I can think of) and you guys certainly haven't gotten rid of unfair terms. Your alliance was a major part of this 'tyrant' until the start of this war, why does it not have to deal with the consequences?
  19. I know right, what if NPO had regained the upper hand
  20. How on earth is an alliance which has lost over 17 million NS lying untouched and undamaged? I don't think Pacifican propaganda is the problem here. Seriously, some of what you guys type defies belief.
×
×
  • Create New...