Jump to content

Treaty compendium


Bob Janova

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 621
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='Bob Janova' timestamp='1286207123' post='2474241']
NpO is kind of the boss of its own minicluster (I've variously called it 'BLEU 2.0', 'Frostbite' and 'Blue' throughout different phases of its history). Most of the time they've rather straddled the lines between the two sides (for example in the earlier two images on this page). MK cancelling on them has weakened the pull from the SG side of the web, I guess, making them appear further on the 'Remnants' side. It is an interesting point, though, which I'd missed myself.

There isn't a strongly connected 'old Orders side', which actually shows up pretty well from the sparseness of the web over there. For example I doubt TOP and NpO or Legion and Argent would consider themselves to be closely allied. It's more a case of 'all the alliances not in SG and affiliates'.

The web does represent reality – it's a direct application of the model to existing treaties – but its implications don't necessary match what's going to happen, as not every treaty is actually the same weight as the model assumes.
[/quote]

I see, so it's the angle that we're looking at the 3D-Model that's hiding the sparseness of the web on the 'old Orders side', when looked at from a different angle they're still very far apart & not really a 'side' at all. That makes sense now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Linden16' timestamp='1286223813' post='2474521']
Just a correction, Polar currently holds a MDoAP with RoK, and the NV treaty is a MDoAP. So I do not know how much that would affect the web.
[/quote]
Did you announce those? If so, links would help :)

I would expect it not to make much difference as it's one tie to either side, but we'll see next update ;)

CDT is on the web, they don't make up a strong enough power cluster for me to label though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bob Janova' timestamp='1286224646' post='2474545']
Did you announce those? If so, links would help :)

I would expect it not to make much difference as it's one tie to either side, but we'll see next update ;)

CDT is on the web, they don't make up a strong enough power cluster for me to label though.
[/quote]

The RoK one I know was announced, I am not sure of the NV one, I do not have time now to search as I have to head to a lab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='maicke' timestamp='1286314172' post='2476307']
How do we get the 3d version?
[/quote]

send bob a PM, the mods wont let us link it on the forums(and i dont have the link) also i think there may be an irc channel with the link in the topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jay Z' timestamp='1286319439' post='2476428']
Is there any way to add like check boxes or something if I only want to see certain treaties?

Like a way to just show MDP, MADPs, Blocs, and MDoAPs?
[/quote]

yes, yes there is. go to the treatytypes file and put a # in front of anything you dont want to see. not 100% sure that will work, you may have to remove it outright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright Bob Nordreich is missing a few there,


1.NoR/Asgaard MDoAP- http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=90556
2.NoR/Nemesis MDoAP- http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=92014
3.NoR/OTS MADP- http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=84141
4.NoR/RoA MDoAP- http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=74523

There you go :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, got a PM and an edit to the wiki to that effect.

If you're running the web program, you can filter the treaties by editing [i]treatytypes.txt[/i] – any treaties that have a type that isn't listed there won't be shown or output in the compendium that the web creates when you close it.

[quote]1.NoR/Asgaard MDoAP- http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=90556
IAA's MDoAP with =LOST=[/quote]
Added these, though a link for the second one would be helpful. The other treaties are with alliances that aren't in the top 80 so that's why they don't appear, though feel free to update the wiki page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bob Janova' timestamp='1286366669' post='2477083']
Yep, got a PM and an edit to the wiki to that effect.

If you're running the web program, you can filter the treaties by editing [i]treatytypes.txt[/i] – any treaties that have a type that isn't listed there won't be shown or output in the compendium that the web creates when you close it.


Added these, though a link for the second one would be helpful. The other treaties are with alliances that aren't in the top 80 so that's why they don't appear, though feel free to update the wiki page.
[/quote]

http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=71284&st=0&p=1902104&hl=+imperial%20+assault%20+alliance&fromsearch=1&#entry1902104

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few things I noticed:

1) Invicta is still purple :o
2) Needs the "legacy-wF" ODP (link: [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=93331]clicky[/url]
3) UPN and ODN canceled
4) MHA nad Umbrella upgraded to a MDoAP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...