SpacingOutMan Posted January 24, 2015 Report Share Posted January 24, 2015 We're close. Thank heavens NPO peaced out because they set one hell of a target! I see. You guys orchestrated them peacing out in order to gain an advantage in the inflicted damage competition! You scumlords! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dajobo Posted January 25, 2015 Report Share Posted January 25, 2015 I see. You guys orchestrated them peacing out in order to gain an advantage in the inflicted damage competition! You scumlords! That's harsh :( We'd have needed fight for a year if they didn't! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexio15 Posted January 25, 2015 Report Share Posted January 25, 2015 That's harsh :( We'd have needed fight for a year if they didn't! Maybe but I have to say Polar have put up one hell of a fight no one can deny that and your balls to the wall outlook at the start of the war earned my respect. Not many AA's who knew a beat down was coming would have the balls to sit with the entire AA out of PM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowDragon Posted January 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2015 Day 78 (Nov 7 11pm - Jan 24 6pm) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KahlanRahl Posted January 25, 2015 Report Share Posted January 25, 2015 Well, it's been real fun guys! Gotta say I'm pretty pleased with where we ended up on the list. Good luck the rest of the combatants. :war: :nuke: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted January 25, 2015 Report Share Posted January 25, 2015 Starfox, there's no grudge within R&R. The embassy stuff has, however, certainly burnt bridges and both alliances are no doubt clearer about their respective futures because of it. I think we could have done things better in this war, but I'm not going to waste my time lamenting something that I can't undo. Think the bridge has been burned for a while honestly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 25, 2015 Report Share Posted January 25, 2015 Well, it's been real fun guys! Gotta say I'm pretty pleased with where we ended up on the list. Good luck the rest of the combatants. :war: :nuke: Shoulda waited a day or two until we passed SNX tbh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted January 25, 2015 Report Share Posted January 25, 2015 Damn WTF taken 1.5mill NS and only dealt 200k... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tehmina Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 I expectee better from WTF tbh.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EViL0nE Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 I'm completely unsurprised by the stats, the mechanics of this world are so far tilted in DBDC's favor to expect anything else is naive. When you sucker-punch an isolationist AA with nations the size that DBDC has, you're going to anarchy most of the people you're fighting in the first set of attacks, which means you control who fights who. Second, DBDC has 7 nations above 50k tech. WTF has 0 (well, had 0. It looks like CT may have grown a conscience and has switched AAs to WTF). A 10k-60k advantage in tech is a big deal and DBDC did a good job of making sure those 7 nations were distributed where they needed to be so maximize control of the battlefield. No one in WTF will ever win a GA*, thanks to the interceptor wonder championed by DBDC they will only land ~50% of their CMS, they will likely never win a naval battle, and they will run out of nukes quickly with no chance of escaping to PM to restock. I guarantee DBDC ran the numbers numerous times before declaring and this outcome was cemented before the first declaration was made.*I'm sure someone in WTF will win a GA here or there by luck, it isn't going to be often enough to be considered meaningful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prodigal Moon Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 (edited) (well, had 0. It looks like CT may have grown a conscience and has switched AAs to WTF). DBDC will probably lose more NS from that one defection than they lose from damage this entire conflict :psyduck: Edited January 26, 2015 by Prodigal Moon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EViL0nE Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 On a side note, as of the latest stats update (available by the link in the OP) Polar is now #1 in damage dealt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prodigal Moon Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 YEAH BUDDY [flair]WHOOOOO [/flair] AINT NO GETTIN OFFA THIS MOTHER FUCKING TRAIN THAT WE ON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubaQuerida Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 YEAH BUDDY [flair]WHOOOOO [/flair] AINT NO GETTIN OFFA THIS MOTHER !@#$@#$ TRAIN THAT WE ON You mean this one? Yeah I don't imagine there anyone getting off that train... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 At least Polaris isn't the one having to watch our backs right now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSoul Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Don't worry about it being propaganda. With RnR being a heavily mid-tier alliance, it would serve more purpose to have them on our side. Thus, for it to be propaganda, it would need to be me attempting to get RnR to side with us, rather than pushing them away. Truthfully, I want nothing to do with them. Historically, I've always liked them, and seen them as a friend many times. Times change. And I lied earlier. I guess I've paid a little attention to backroom dealings, and I do not like the way Dajobo has been treated in their embassy, nor the comments I've seen on IRC. It's also been an unofficial mission of Polar to put RnR into the negatives, for good reason. There's more to it than a large number of wars, as there are a number of underlying issues. However, it would seem that IRON-Sparta being #1 was simply a matter of circumstance. And in that case you are 100% correct. I assume Dajobo showed you both sides, right? You know, where he behaved like a child throwing a tantrum because he didn't like the way things turned out. It's not like the war kicked off, and we suddenly started tearing him down left and right. We're a nice bunch. I, along with the rest of R&R, have pretty routinely avoided responding to the disparaging comments coming from you and yours on the OWF over the last couple of months. It's not matter of having nothing to say, but that we don't see the need to add fuel to a fire we'd rather not see spread. What y'all do with that is entirely your prerogative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dajobo Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 I assume Dajobo showed you both sides, right? You know, where he behaved like a child throwing a tantrum because he didn't like the way things turned out. It's not like the war kicked off, and we suddenly started tearing him down left and right. We're a nice bunch. I, along with the rest of R&R, have pretty routinely avoided responding to the disparaging comments coming from you and yours on the OWF over the last couple of months. It's not matter of having nothing to say, but that we don't see the need to add fuel to a fire we'd rather not see spread. What y'all do with that is entirely your prerogative. Mate I told you what I thought of you, not had a tantrum. There's a very large difference. I also kept it to the embassy and have since left, as requested. If you want to have it out on the OWF I can accommodate you, but not here in an OOC stats thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 A Time of VictoriesPolaris now leads top damage inflicted totals despite fighting on 12 fronts, while our friends and allies occupy 6 of the top 10 spotsNpO Troops advance against Parasitic invasion forces in defense of the Polar Motherland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helios Posted January 27, 2015 Report Share Posted January 27, 2015 (edited) A Time of Victories Heavy Defeat Fixed, seeing as you've also taken close to double (and in some cases even quadruple) the total damage of any other alliance, in addition to having more than half (182) of your membership at 10k NS or below. Edited January 27, 2015 by Helios Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted January 27, 2015 Report Share Posted January 27, 2015 Fixed, seeing as you've also taken close to double the total damage of any other alliance, in addition to having more than half (182) of your membership at 10k NS or below. How is that a defeat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helios Posted January 27, 2015 Report Share Posted January 27, 2015 How is that a defeat? Anybody with a brain, which from the looks of things doesn't include you, would realise that losing 12m NS is not a victory. But by all means, continue to act deluded, I will continue to be amused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dajobo Posted January 27, 2015 Report Share Posted January 27, 2015 If your only goal is to win a war defined by stats, it's a loss. It wasn't our only goal though ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBRaiders Posted January 27, 2015 Report Share Posted January 27, 2015 Stats are always great. According to these numbers, if DBDC had 2,770 wars we would have inflicted 51,646,196 damage. :gun: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted January 27, 2015 Report Share Posted January 27, 2015 Stats are always great. According to these numbers, if DBDC had 2,770 wars we would have inflicted 51,646,196 damage. :gun: Too bad you can't exploit the lower and middle tiers the same way you do with the upper tier. :smug: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dajobo Posted January 27, 2015 Report Share Posted January 27, 2015 Stats are always great. According to these numbers, if DBDC had 2,770 wars we would have inflicted 51,646,196 damage. :gun: That's probably about right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.