Rush Sykes Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Considering the fact you'll bring this up no matter if the topic of the thread is about us or not has become redundant. I am pretty sure anyone who is even just a casual reader has been abundantly aware of your feelings of IRON's actions as of late. I would hope by now a thread could go quite a few pages before it's derailed by the same comments that are prevalent on all the threads, but alas, it seems not. Anyway...back to the actual purpose of this announcement This thread could certainly have gone without that if your member had not arrogantly essentially called other posters unintelligent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) This thread could certainly have gone without that if your member had not arrogantly essentially called other posters unintelligent.Hey now Rush calling other people stupid on the owf is all they have to make themselves feel better about their incompetence at literally everything apart from being a backstabbing piece of @#$%. Edited February 17, 2014 by Stefano Palmieri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Hey now Rush calling other people stupid on the owf is all they have to make themselves feel better about their incompetence at literally everything apart from being a backstabbing piece of @#$%. Sounds like the anthem of CN 2014 tbf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Sounds like the anthem of CN 2014 tbf. In that case I retract everything I said :v: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elendil Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 This is a very welcome development. A step towards a sane international order. Congratulations and thanks to all concerned in the negotiations. It shows our two great alliances can rise above the confused and pointless wrangling of the last war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovidsidios Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Gotta go with Canik on this one. Regardless of what we may have done, IRON and DBDC had it in them to see it through. Respect. I look forward to working closely with you both in the future. o/To Better Days ------------------------------------------------------------ Neo, I don't know why I'm doing this, but You say At least own that you $%&@ed them, even if it wasn't intentional. And they respond Please see my previous post and signature. Which would have read We $%&@ed up, we know it, we'll pay for it, and we'll try really hard not to do it again. -Montosh's Sig Other allies, sure, we $%&@ed that up.... And yet, Oh, where you actually say that you didn't $%&@ that ally but did others? That counts as owning it? All you do is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster83 Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Nice to see FEAR is still active. Best of luck to you all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duelking Posted February 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 This is a very interesting treaty. Will Article III. be applied retroactively to future treaty partners? Section 4 reads that it will if I understand your question correctly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Vicarious Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Congrats to our allies in IRON, I can't imagine this was easy to broker. Good luck to all going forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) Neo, I don't know why I'm doing this, but You say And they respond Which would have read And yet, All you do is You could, you know, read "Other allies" and note that he's dodging that specific one@Samus, you're allowed to move the goal posts on what "hiding your upper tier" means. I'm not allowed to note that everyone in DBDC's range was cowering in fear? Edited February 17, 2014 by Neo Uruk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcrews Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Nice to see FEAR is still active. Best of luck to you all. We don't have much of an owf presence, that's intentional, sometimes quietness can be mistaken for inactivity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yevgeni Luchenkov Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Section 4 reads that it will if I understand your question correctly. Somehow had missed Article III, Section IV. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pingu Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 We don't have much of an owf presence, that's intentional, sometimes quietness can be mistaken for inactivity. They're obviously plotting something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da DreadLord Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 I approve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovidsidios Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) They're obviously plotting something. Lible Edited February 17, 2014 by Ovidsidios Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icewolf Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 This treaty makes me happy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) The peace mode warrior arrives just in time! Has a nation a year older than mine... check. Has 60% the casualties I have... check. Calls me a PM Warrior. Check. Seems legit. Edited February 17, 2014 by Rush Sykes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoADarthCyfe6 Posted February 18, 2014 Report Share Posted February 18, 2014 The most Earth-Shattering NAP since existence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2BKs Posted February 18, 2014 Report Share Posted February 18, 2014 lol DBDC needs a NAP? Kinda ruined the view the public had on them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samus Posted February 18, 2014 Report Share Posted February 18, 2014 Has a nation a year older than mine... check. Has 60% the casualties I have... check. Calls me a PM Warrior. Check. Seems legit.Infra huggers tend to have more casualties than tech heavy nations. I've had a 2:1 tech:infra ratio for well over 2 years.You could, you know, read "Other allies" and note that he's dodging that specific one@Samus, you're allowed to move the goal posts on what "hiding your upper tier" means. I'm not allowed to note that everyone in DBDC's range was cowering in fear?Your post said our entire upper tier, I corrected your mistake, because it wasn't out entire upper tier it was only 1/5th of it. And I was and still am in range of their bottom nations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovidsidios Posted February 18, 2014 Report Share Posted February 18, 2014 lol DBDC needs a NAP? Kinda ruined the view the public had on them. That word seems so out of place next to "DBDC" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkfox Posted February 18, 2014 Report Share Posted February 18, 2014 (edited) Glad to see this happen. Reminder that IRON's entire upper tier hid from the alliance this NAP was signed with for a very long time But yeah, keep telling Rush how !@#$ his warchest was. That'll make you look tougher than him. Odd, I am part of the uppertier and I recall fighting STA. But you couldn't be wrong, right? Edited February 18, 2014 by darkfox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted February 18, 2014 Report Share Posted February 18, 2014 Your post said our entire upper tier, I corrected your mistake, because it wasn't out entire upper tier it was only 1/5th of it. And I was and still am in range of their bottom nations.Look, son, I'm just showing you how it feels to go against the wrestling machine when you're ill-prepared. You made a mistake in the past, but you can fix it with your upcoming title shot. Just fight harder than you did against an Olympic gold medalist and you'll be in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted February 18, 2014 Report Share Posted February 18, 2014 (edited) Infra huggers tend to have more casualties than tech heavy nations. I've had a 2:1 tech:infra ratio for well over 2 years. What a moronic response. You know where infra heavy nations (11,999 is the most infra I ever had, and I had it ONCE AND I had 14K tech when I had it, this was prior to EQ.) have an advantage in accruing casualties? The 1st 5 days of a war. Infra is well on its way to being melted by then. Every time you post about this stuff, it really shows the ignorance have in regards to how wars work. Stop embarrassing IRON. Edited February 18, 2014 by Rush Sykes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaskowicz Posted February 18, 2014 Report Share Posted February 18, 2014 This is good to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.