MitchellBade Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 Finally someone with some decency. o/ NATO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 Big fan of this move. o/ NATO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perceus Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 [quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1327910197' post='2910481'] Let us pray that you do not get to suffer harmful consequences for your honorable stance. [/quote] No matter, we will deal with the consequences, painful or not, We'll stand by our decision and ride to the end. Or until I have exhausted the last bit of pixel in infra, and money. again, o/ NATO o/ RoK o/ my fellow NATOans for standing up with me, shoulder by shoulder, side by side, and keeping our head high and our spirits live! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 Good show as usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaoshawk Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 A respectable move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kongo Jack IV Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 [quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1327904907' post='2910356'] What a shame. [/quote] I'll echo this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzz Lightyear Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1327904943' post='2910360'] NG and Umbrella are disappoint o/ NATO [/quote] Not really, NATO isnt much of an obstacle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cao Pai Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 +1 NATO. I knew you had it in ya, somewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercoolyellow Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 Honorable move NATO. Much respect for this. [quote name='Duncan King' timestamp='1327906006' post='2910401'] I respect your decision NATO but [IMG]http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff120/duncanking/Facedesk-1.jpg[/IMG] This is the second election in a row during which bullets have been flying or about to fly. Wonder if it's a trend. If it is, then the next skirmish will be in the first week of April when we elect our April/May government. No idea what TFD will be doing when this goes south. Many of us had a lot of fun with MHA and Knights of Ni and are still hung over a month later. We may just cheer from the sidelines. [img]http://foreigndivision.net/Smileys/default/cheer.gif[/img] [/quote] DK, I really have a problem with this post. First of all even if you don't plan on helping your ally, announcing it puts them in a weaker position. Why would you do that? Second, this isn't just a mdoap you have with them, its a DMT. It should be more valuable than what you are demonstrating right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzptm Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1327979162' post='2911200'] DK, I really have a problem with this post. First of all even if you don't plan on helping your ally, announcing it puts them in a weaker position. Why would you do that? Second, this isn't just a mdoap you have with them, its a DMT. It should be more valuable than what you are demonstrating right now. [/quote] Maybe they'd prefer NATO not exercise the optional defense/offense clauses of their treaty with the admittedly chaotic Ragnarok at this time. As an ally, they have a right to request their allies take in their considerations. The RoK situation is convoluted, at best. Getting too deeply involved risks more than just an alliance's honor or reputation: it means getting involved on one side or the other of a pointed internal conflict. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='zzzptm' timestamp='1327979448' post='2911207'] Maybe they'd prefer NATO not exercise the optional defense/offense clauses of their treaty with the admittedly chaotic Ragnarok at this time. As an ally, they have a right to request their allies take in their considerations. The RoK situation is convoluted, at best. Getting too deeply involved risks more than just an alliance's honor or reputation: it means getting involved on one side or the other of a pointed internal conflict. [/quote] Or maybe DK was just expressing a personal opinion regarding the situation. Sometimes the simplest explanation is the best Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercoolyellow Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='zzzptm' timestamp='1327979448' post='2911207'] Maybe they'd prefer NATO not exercise the optional defense/offense clauses of their treaty with the admittedly chaotic Ragnarok at this time. As an ally, they have a right to request their allies take in their considerations. [/quote] Oh they definitely do have the right to urge NATO in the direction they see best, and if they feel NATO shouldn't get in, they should say so. But not in public before everyone else. Its like your grandma in her underwear. You don't want anyone to see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dev0win Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1327981140' post='2911240'] Oh they definitely do have the right to urge NATO in the direction they see best, and if they feel NATO shouldn't get in, they should say so. But not in public before everyone else. Its like your grandma in her underwear. You don't want anyone to see it. [/quote] Oh I knew someone had a bit of sense above their shoulders. Thanks SCY =) No granny panties wanted around these parts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gpn777 Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1327979162' post='2911200'] Honorable move NATO. Much respect for this. DK, I really have a problem with this post. First of all even if you don't plan on helping your ally, announcing it puts them in a weaker position. Why would you do that? Second, this isn't just a mdoap you have with them, its a DMT. It should be more valuable than what you are demonstrating right now. [/quote] Sure, we'll watch from the sidelines [IMG]http://i43.tinypic.com/moy6b.jpg[/IMG] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muwen1234 Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 Respectable move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wes the wise Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 o/ NATO Good show my friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan King Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Sir Humphrey' timestamp='1327979931' post='2911220'] Or maybe DK was just expressing a personal opinion regarding the situation. Sometimes the simplest explanation is the best [/quote] Or maybe DK was just saying inflammatory things for fun. [quote name='gpn777' timestamp='1327981587' post='2911251'] Sure, we'll watch from the sidelines [IMG]http://i43.tinypic.com/moy6b.jpg[/IMG] [/quote] Got my popcorn [img]http://foreigndivision.net/Smileys/default/sign0004.gif[/img] and my beverage [img]http://foreigndivision.net/Smileys/default/party0036.gif[/img] ready to go. Edited January 31, 2012 by Duncan King Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Brandon Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 (edited) Misleading title says it all, there really was nothing to see here. Edited January 31, 2012 by King Brandon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 This isn't news. Nobody expects NATO to change from what it has always been. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='nippy' timestamp='1328004926' post='2911468'] This isn't news. Nobody expects NATO to change from what it has always been. [/quote] That statement is vague and opiniated. Please explain the following: 1) What is news? 2) What has NATO always been? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvengerNL Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='berbers' timestamp='1328005532' post='2911470'] That statement is vague and opiniated. Please explain the following: 1) What is news? 2) What has NATO always been? [/quote] 1) Im not sure, but I know this isn't 2) Irrelevant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='AvengerNL' timestamp='1328006368' post='2911472'] 2) Irrelevant [/quote] You are right. The answer to the question is irrelevant. I can't think why Berbers thought it necessary to ask. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parandiac Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='Duncan King' timestamp='1327986166' post='2911343'] Or maybe DK was just saying inflammatory things for fun. [/quote] [IMG]http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y289/3809940TAA/NewImage.jpg[/IMG] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 [quote name='Parandiac' timestamp='1328016182' post='2911506'] [IMG]http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y289/3809940TAA/NewImage.jpg[/IMG] [/quote] this is basically what is happening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perceus Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 [quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1328036428' post='2911617'] this is basically what is happening [/quote] isnt it what it always happens here in the OWF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.