Jump to content

Rhizoctonia

Members
  • Posts

    533
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rhizoctonia

  1. Lol? Man you're big man with that type of insult. You have no actual rebuttal to the truth I delivered so you resort to OOC attacks. Congrats Bro. [OOC]But to your remark, I have one, and I quite enjoy driving it. I'm glad you could to, also glad you feel the need to attack someone on basis of wealth[/OOC]
  2. Woah now, I think you out of most should watch calling people "hypocrites." Let's not forget you for a long time did the very thing you're defending against now to other alliances without any care to their well being. As I've pointed out before in another of these umpteen threads, you only gave two shits once DBDC raided an alliance you cared about, before that, you had no compassion or care about the other alliances you raided while wearing the DBDC. So you might want to quit calling people hypocrites so loosely, you're one the biggest with you now suddenly condemning DBDC for raiding innocent alliances when you participated in such actions time and time before with them. You didn't just have some change of heart because you realized what you use to participate is bad, you did because it affected an alliance you cared about, and had it not, you'd likely still be raiding someone else. I've yet to see any repayments or reparations to the individuals you did this too, so maybe you should pipe down with your moral high ground stance. Other then that, everyone carry on, I enjoy reading the same things I've read in the other 10 topics.
  3. Damnit I lost to TK....but 12th ain't too shabby!
  4. Was a great tool to look at throughout war, as this is one topic I checked almost daily. Thanks
  5. Agreed. I've been saying that for a long time now about IRON/TOP...fighting it out against one another is the only way to resolve things and move forward. Congrats on peace, been fun fighting you'll.
  6. You really should pipe down. Again with your "DBDC are bad" because they raid innocent alliances. Really you should quit posting that kind of shit as it's been blantently pointed out you yourself did this to many innocent alliances and had no care for them when you did it, so quit acting like you're any different then anyone in DBDC. You're not fighting for the innocent alliances from being raided, you're because they raided an alliance you use to have affiliation with. Where were you when previous innocent alliances were being hit? O, that's right, you were part of the raiding. You're not noble for now sticking up against them, you don't get sympathy for your past actions because you want to join the "noble crusade." You sure like to call people butthurt, but if anything you're the most butthurt out of everyone posting. You're fighting against them for your own motives and because they hit an alliance you care about, not because you care about the others who were raided before that you participated in. Now because it's ideal for you, you want people to come to the aid of you...asking alliances to rally against DBDC now that it suits you, yet you were no where to be seen when others spoke up trying to rally against them before. You don't get to cast stones at something you were part of and participated in without care because you suddenly made a 360, your past actions are not forgotten and suddenly you're reborn and feel your vindicated for raiding the alliances you did before. I will shed no blood or my alliance members blood for some hypocrite who is ok with ones actions as long as they get their way and who is attacked. You've had plenty of time to stand up and fight for the "innocent" time and time again if you felt DBDC was wrong...you didn't, you were one who was doing it, so now no one gives a shit what you say. It's one thing to leave to fight DBDC against a raid of an alliance you care about, it's whole other thing to ask for assistance and call DBDC actions out when you were part of it. You lost that right, so quit acting like you have it
  7. Neo Uruk is about the only one worked up in this thread.
  8. Hitting neutrals means literally nothing to me or most people. I could careless if they were going to hit GPA or WTF, both I feel do nothing to help this world, and if there were no neutral alliances I wouldn't be heartbroken. It's not really a surprise anyway they got hit, I never would of thought just because they were "neutral" that they were protected from DBDC raiding them. For someone who sure is on IRON's dick to revolt against them, you would think you'd be supplying some logs to persuade us besides just accusing them without proof, other then if it revolved around when both DBDC and IRON were having a mini Cold War that's not news so don't waste ur breath anyway. If you got something to prove with evidence, then actually putting it out there is more intelligent then "keeping them secret." You're only proving this is butthurt more then anything, and trying to have someone else do your dirty work for you. Needless to say, you're becoming more a laughing stock then Tywin.... Which I wasn't sure was possible.
  9. What I find most humorous about this whole thing is this all evolves around someone who once was a DBDC member. You went along with the raids on other alliances (even in the logs you boast about how you have fought more then the rest, even though others call you out on that), supported DBDC, and now suddenly because for once they raid someone you don't want them to you come on trying to rally troops around you. Sorry, it's one thing for a member of an alliance who is getting raided to come on here to try to get a group to back them, it's another when it comes from a former member who just recently left because they are pissed they chose an alliance they once were members of. You have no leg to stand on, you calling out DBDC on their actions when you went along with them when they did it to alliances you didn't care about means absolutely nothing to me, all it shows is your butthurt over it. WTF would be better off having someone no one knows come on here to try to rally against them then someone who complains about DBDC raiding people when they were up until recently, part of that. I get you being upset if you didn't want to see WTF raided, but calling them out for their raiding practices and trying to get other alliances to hit them is laughable. Btw, these logs are as many said, pointless and not even close to what people were hoping to be "juicy" logs. You trying to hold the "other logs" in attempt to make people join the resistance to get them is quite stupid and never gonna work. Either post some actual news to people, or stfu, because either you got something to show and let the whole world see it, or you don't. So far, you've proven you dont. Nothing is new to anyone, besides your ooc attacks, and if you think it's news to IRON that DBDC was thinking about hitting us, it's not, we were both preparing for it to happen. And you don't need to remind anyone that treaties can be canceled, this isn't our or anyone first rodeo and had that happen, so you can stop with the wonderful insight of how politics and treaties work, we're past treaties 101.
  10. In my opinion there should be no known place one can hide and never be touched. Whose to say one doesn't join that, build up without any fear of being hit and then leaves to join an alliance to beat up on someone later. Don't get me wrong, I don't act as if I know what's it's like to stay neutral and do nothing but build up my nation for zero point, but I don't see how people find enjoyment out of that. Like it or not, this world revolves around war, and though it's their prerogative to stay neutral and never fight and stay out of world politics, it's others choices not to allow it. If you don't want to be hit, the only safe haven is sitting in PM for all eternity. To answer your question, being in a micro is probably the safest with a protectorate and be basically unknown to the rest of the world. Other then that, being in a neutral alliance is still likely the safest spot if you do not want to fight at all, as besides the recent raids, the "neutral" alliances of stayed pretty safe throughout the years.
  11. Thanks, I needed a good laugh, and this topic didn't disappoint. Schattenmann taking the time to message members of IRON and myself just put icing on the cake. I thank you for directing me to a comical thread, and trying to "look out" for us.
  12. Agree....making this off OWF forums makes things easily skewed
  13. Congrats on peace, and a well fought war. I enjoyed fighting the few MI6 guys I was in range of.
  14. Dude, half your posts are you crying about one thing or another that some alliance is doing
  15. Seems my sarcasm flew well over your head.
  16. My guess would be in edit my nation tab I see your active enough to post, why don't you come out and join the fun
  17. I can see you have a hard on for us, I hope someone can help you with that. Continue to spew a bunch of BS. If we were worried about TOP's upper tier we would of peaced the majority of them out when we hit Sparta when we knew it would likely bring them in (Sparta nor MI6 had much of one). Yet, our upper tier was wide open, and they decided to all run into PM before declaring on us, instead of hitting our upper. Unlike TOP who peaced their whole upper for the last month to escape damage, ours have been put in PM for strategic planning and I'll let what happens the next few weeks speak for themselves. Seems like you want to get your jab in now while you can before it becomes what it truely is, premature propaganda. The actual figures I speak of that you want to overlook and disregard is the actual factual numbers of mid-tier nations of IRON and our opposition. You're correct, we outnumber our opposition in terms of total number of nations, and you're correct that we outnumber our opposition in total NS. What you want to disregard is where our strength, and numbers in terms of where nations lie within certain nation strengths, and where the opposition numbers and strength lie. That's fine, obviously you wanting to overlook such figures helps with trying to smear us, thus I can fully understand you wanting to do so, as your goal here is make us look bad, not good, by any means possible.
  18. I'm glad that's "plain" for you. You're entitled to your opinion, but sorry if your voice doesn't speak for "everyone" as much as you wish it did. The PM shot is cute too, I'm glad that ur ally has hid in it all war and now a few of our guys are strategically put into PM and you're quick to take a cheap shot with no basis. Our upper tier has been wide open up until recently, TOP could of hit at anytime, but they sat in PM. If you think it's anything more then strategic planning you're blantently delusional. It's funny people complain about mud slinging, when your response is exactly that. I'm glad you also suck at running numbers and figures, you may want to work on that before posting ignorant remarks. Usually try to stay out of pecker measuring arguments, but you had to much BS in yours I took the bait
  19. Tywin says it's not the same, whew...thanks for clearing that up. *sarcasm*
  20. Eh it is what it is. It was pretty much known we were outnumbered in the mid-tiers going in, like many on our side were. The alliances we fought were mostly mid tier alliances besides TOP(who have their upper in PM), and everyone knows IRON's meat is our upper tier. Due to no targets, 100 or so nations above 100k NS in IRON have seen little to no action and thus none were beaten down to smaller size to assist. I'm actually quite happy with the fight our mid guys have done with the gaps we have in the mids compared to our enemies. Enemies have done a good job as well with their advantage in this area as well.
×
×
  • Create New...