Jump to content

Tiberius

Members
  • Content Count

    773
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Tiberius

  • Rank
    Turkey twizzling since '06

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Sanctioned Alliance
    New Pacific Order
  • Nation Name
    Nuke Town
  • Alliance Name
    New Pacific Order
  • Resource 1
    Cattle
  • Resource 2
    Fish

Recent Profile Visitors

1,587 profile views
  1. NG as an alliance disbanded last year, essentially alleviating ownership of everything NG related. In any case I am merely playing along with you all that the FTW and NG flag are the same. Furthermore the FTW use of the yin yang is far superior to NGs use of it.
  2. Read the DoW thread and statement within. Nothing is ever permanent. The war will conclude once we have achieved our goals. NG-RFI and NG-Oculus are seperate conflicts. As above, seperate conflicts. FTW's war effort isn't an interest of ours. They wear their flag better than when Non Grata owned it. No.
  3. FTW Stats for the war COBRA Stats
  4. Alliances have always been tied together via the treaty web. What used to happen is one side would pluck the others allies away. Mass cancellations would happen and then a war would happen. Look how quickly the continuum fell when karma wanted to bring down NPO. These days no one seems to want to spend months coalition building, or their opsec is terrible. On top of that too many people are friends across spheres, which as you allude to means there is invariably 0 grudges and rivalry.
  5. Alliances would simply spread their membership across a number of alliances or create a hit alliance with the Nations they are going to use for the 1st round etc.
  6. A question based around merging alliances, maybe. If the alliances ranked 20 and above were to merge to form 1 or 2 alliances that would make a good bit of difference to the politics of the game. There is too many dead husks of alliances with one or 2 people running them. When you add those one or two together you are effectively creating an active alliance with enough hands to run it.
  7. Apart from the one who has $10 as a warchest They also seem to find enough time to log in as they have always been active in the last 3 days. NG's own little Terminators.
  8. I'm not saying they are special. They are effective in these situations. Very boring too I'd imagine.
  9. Same tactics used on SPATR/Mongols and we killed their cash too, admittedly we started using these tactics late on which is why that war dragged on for so long, but once we started using it it ended fairly quickly. There's only 2 NGers above 10 bil. So that will take a year or so to go through. The rest will take a lot less time. There's also already 11 NGers below 30mil. 13 below 100mil. 17 below 1 bil.
  10. Getting people to surrender only really works if you have the freedom to hit someone into submission without them having the necessary support to fight back. NG Nations no matter how small will continue to get hit and staggered so they won't get that freedom. Zigur, I am sure you remember this from when we ran you dry out of funds using the same tactics. ISX was much better organized than NG and I'd hazard a guess better prepared Warchest wise.
  11. Hitting one alliance has never been a global war. How many of those "1/4 of the Nations" are actually in range? I'm sure you were calling the vast majority of "1/4 of the Nations" irrelevant only a few posts back.....
  12. Yes correct. We will keep the war going for as long as we deem it necessary. I.e we accomplish the goals we wanted to achieve in this war. Just like every other war that has happened. There is no intention to keep it going on indefinitely/permanently. That decision will ultimately be yours when the time comes to discuss surrender terms.
×
×
  • Create New...