Jump to content

Rhizoctonia

Members
  • Posts

    533
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rhizoctonia

  1. That's fine, 2 x 0 is still zero. So as long as its back to 0 all in the world is fine. Haha
  2. Admin needs to correct this. Lyanna was at 0 caustlities....I think after it was brought back online some of mine went to hers. Please correct
  3. 3000 day old nation with no casualties and .4 NS. Man...I always thought it was sad many of us have stuck around this world for as long as we have. Then there's you, who made a nation to !@#$ talk on forums about a world you never even tried on. What a absolute depressing life you live, truly pathetic.
  4. Haha thanks! Glad to see this posted, and happy to have my name attached to it!
  5. Well I guess it's time to put in my resignation...you can't disgrace Crab like that, not from this Blue Crab Lover.
  6. I thought that was only during the sitting. I wasn't under the impression or thought that it was forever. But could of missed a ruling or something on that.
  7. This is a top tier production. Congrats to XX, band is back together
  8. Glad to see this happen! Look forward to working with FTW once again
  9. Or, crazy thought, look at who you're attacking before actually declaring. You decided to declare on nations that are in alliances, and you don't expect any response in return, that's your first problem. All the people you're attacking likely would look to make peace with you had you approached them, continuing to hit them is only going to increase your problem. It's not the admin's fault that you came onto this game and just started declaring wars on nations, who are in active alliances with people within your range, and you're sitting here surprised someone stronger or playing the game longer declared on you for response of you hitting their alliance partner. There's reason to talk about how the game is hard for new nations, but in this regard, this has nothing to do with admin and everything to do with someone joining a game they're unfamiliar on and just start attacking people. This game is much easier for newer nations to get established than it once was with the increase in the amounts of aid, and before even stronger nations would have the ability to hit you in terms of strength. Use to be +- 250 nations, now it's 100. Again, I don't want to see people run off from the game, but this is a your problem, not admin problem. I'd reach out to find a peaceful resolution and choose better if you're going to raid people. Or join a more established one that will offer you protection (likely not from raiding as many alliances don't allow it), and nation building in terms of trade circles and tech deals. I might weigh the same as many professional boxers, doesn't mean I just walk into the ring with them and start throwing hands. I'll get demolished because they actually been doing it for awhile, while I'm just starting. I would expect picking fights with people just because they're the same size isn't the only thing to think about.
  10. Love to see new faces, and love to see wanting to fight. That being said, randomly declaring wars on nations in other alliances are likely to result in you getting attacked by more of their members, and much stronger ones. My advice, stop raiding, or stick to raiding nations that aren't in an alliance.
  11. Ahh then this makes sense for what I would guess the admin is doing to prevent the scripts. I'm for this, for the idea of people using this tactic. I do wonder though if instead of a captcha, it could be like the click the box if you're not a robot. That's a lot easier and quicker I'd bet for people who are actually on when an attack is done. Also as stated, I would think the amount of clicks a nation gets would be able to be spotted. I would think a script would really increase those numbers compared to normal use, and would much rather just see admin ban these nations eliminating the need for a captcha.
  12. Yea i only have the captcha actually appear after I've done many things that day. So I wonder if it's even helping the intended problem. I hope admin does cut down on the scripts though...I know of one person I fought that had to be using one.
  13. I think the stroke already happened with his latest forum topic
  14. Well I guess you really felt the need to embarrass yourself and your alliance.
  15. You're doing it all wrong. You're suppose to !@#$ on your coalition partners on here and call them out. Not to point out any positive
  16. 1. I find it funny that you took offense to something that wasn't even a shot at you. Jason throws shade at NG because only 1 war has been declared after declaration, and we simply pointed out its hard to declare a lot of wars with not many available targets. Kinda explains itself...but keep going on the soapbox 2. Talk to us when you have 2.8 mil net damage
  17. Peace for all or Peace for none. I know of one alliance that I know quite well who years ago found them in the same position that Polar found itself in. One where most of the membership would of rather did what Polar did this war than what their Government chose to do. So I surely hope they aren't ones pushing to exclude alliances from peace. I know the fallout that came from this alliance's decision to not only not help their allies but hit there allies ally, when the rest of AA disagreed with the choice. I'd hate to rehash old drama, but I certainly will.
  18. Yea this person mentioned he wasn't a big poster on here....he/she should probably should stick to not posting on here when they have no idea what they're talking about. 35 wars to 7...yea masterchief certainly hasn't helped at all
×
×
  • Create New...