lonewolfe2015

Have you guys fought anyone before us...? Your nations are pretty tiny for having a full round to grow.

This is no party, this is a gang. So I welcome you to the gang otherwise known as NOIR.

Not a surprise to be honest, anyone who did anything in FCO left awhile ago, it hasn't been that same alliance since last summer. Shame to see so many former friends gone from Bob with FCO. A last shoutout to Kana, Paavi, Bitter (Drool) and many others that left with them.

Hmmm, I remember FHU, didn't know they still are chugging along. Good treaty here, congrats guys.

Check back tomorrow, "5/25/2009 1:12:34 PM" aka, you made your nation after 12:00PM and your bonus is one day late.

Hey Bob, Asgaard is part of NOIR. Also, am I blind or are we not in the web? Not a complaint, just curious. Thanks.

[quote name='Asa Phillips' date='24 May 2010 - 09:09 AM' timestamp='1274706564' post='2310148'] They know that. [/quote] I'm curious, but are you guys willing to disclose how many ghost nations you currently hold? I'm just wondering if nearly all of the 195ish nations you have there are members,or if you are having to accommodate yourselves for ghosts as well. I for one will be awaiting the day Bob goes apocalyptic and GPA, WTF and TDO get into slugfests with people.

[quote name='Lukcia' date='24 May 2010 - 05:27 AM' timestamp='1274693260' post='2310073'] Just remember WTF, everyone at UPN loves you guys. <3 [/quote] They aren't doing it for you guys.

Gratz, two good pairings right here.

To be honest, I'd rather enable a variable update so that each nation's update is hidden without spy ops and if you update strike someone then they could very well update strike you when you aren't paying attention. The advantage gets reversed.

Final nation for circle #2 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=154711 Told him to post, but feel free to begin early if you are ambitious.

[quote name='Kirke' date='23 May 2010 - 02:58 PM' timestamp='1274641087' post='2309273'] Circle#76 finished--waiting on confirmations [/quote] Woa... you're a goddess Kirke. That circle has been giving us a nightmare for a couple months.

[quote name='Fallen_Fool' date='23 May 2010 - 01:02 PM' timestamp='1274634118' post='2309179'] Any PIAT which makes reference to "voluntary military assistance" under the Assistance section is an ODP. [/quote] Yes, but Bob said "An ODP and a PIAT are pretty much the same thing." We have PIATs with no military clauses.

[quote name='Left_Behind' date='23 May 2010 - 01:41 PM' timestamp='1274636443' post='2309217'] I'm ok with that I was referring to your ability to cheer for that god awful hockey team. Btw drop that treaty with Sparta and your an auto ten [/quote] Just because there are no Detroit fans in Asgaard doesn't mean you can hate on us. They made it how far? That's what I thought

[quote name='Hiro Nakara' date='23 May 2010 - 01:31 PM' timestamp='1274635842' post='2309205'] You may want to check your alliance aid screen then [/quote] One person is since he has unfinished deals from when he joined, gimme a break

[quote name='Balder' date='23 May 2010 - 01:18 PM' timestamp='1274635074' post='2309195'] Had a couple of bad tech deals from Asgaard between 3/4 members of the Corporation which meant I had to go find replacement tech for the shipments they didn't get :-p. It's my only experience with Asgaard, which thus, lends to a bit lower grade because we haven't actually had much social interaction. [/quote] The funny thing is that's not likely since we don't sell our tech externally.

[quote name='Left_Behind' date='23 May 2010 - 12:00 PM' timestamp='1274630437' post='2309116'] That's higher then I would rate you guys. [/quote] Sorry we weren't supportive enough of you trying new things Lefty, I'll try to be more considerate next time

No... PIATs have to have optional defense in them to be a PIAT/ODP

Why would it not be? It is an Optional Defense Pact, we'd not sign such treaties if we had no intentions of activating them to defend our allies. I value ODP's very highly, they are in some cases better than a MDP with non-chaining clauses if the two alliances signing them are true friends. Less headaches too.

[quote name='Balder' date='23 May 2010 - 05:49 AM' timestamp='1274608177' post='2308952'] Just a question, and I don't mean to sound rude, because I'm honestly just curious. Why a 4? Have you had bad dealings with the Corporation? [/quote] I'd ask the same about Asgaard's rating as a 3.

I just hope you all have as impressive development programs as you do recruitment. Come on GATO and Sparta!

A bump because Kirke and her circles are awesome.

I know Aircastle didn't exactly reach the epitome of military awesomeness, and I was never one of those people to claim they were. I know a bit about how they did during the war when talking to Jon (including him saying 'AYR' was done post war) Most of my questions were simply revolving around why TOP won't let it go. Good to see you gave a pretty reasonable explanation BEazy, but for the record, it's difficult to do the homework on every discussion of someone else's you enter, especially when you aren't terribly active as is due to other obligations. If I made this topic, I'd have done the homework and made some statistical graphs or charts to demonstrate my point, even if it amounted to a listing of the fact that they never attacked at the same time. E: As for coming in trying to stir up trouble, the entire basis of this thread was of that nature. You began with a hostile attitude towards an extinct alliance, not exactly neutral territory by any stretch of the imagination.

[quote name='commander thrawn' date='22 May 2010 - 06:19 PM' timestamp='1274566732' post='2308451'] Pretty sure that is a fitting response, no one said they were great, they are just asking why you keep bringing up how bad they were even though they are all gone. [/quote] I think it's time to leave it be Thrawn, obviously we're not welcome in their discussion on the numerous faults of Aircastle because we're not the type to crucify an already dead alliance. Demonstrated by the obvious response of ignoring my question because he felt I ignored the rest of an argument we've already been over. I still find it funny that an alliance which thinks of themselves so highly feels threatened by a dead alliance though...