Haflinger Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1297093329' post='2624033'] Of course, it's clearly not related to the fact TOP and MK has similar ns ranges and would be best suited for declaring on the same target. [/quote] Indeed. This is true. This is why TOP declared on Molon Labe. Oh wait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HellAngel Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1297166224' post='2625579'] Indeed. This is true. This is why TOP declared on Molon Labe. Oh wait. [/quote] Really... after 30 pages of rambling you come up with this again? Read the thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feanor Noldorin Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Stetson' timestamp='1297151232' post='2625484'] I have no reason to doubt you but their actions were to be involved in that war via their treaties not through a surprise preemption. I'll always take actions over words. [/quote] Everyone was suppose to go in on the night of the attack but they were unable to get enough people online (or something to that effect) so they were going to pick up the counters instead. The entire pre-emptive strike was a joint measure between 7-8 alliances. It wasn't about trying to follow treaties but believe it either way you wish to. [quote]I'm not sure what we ever did to you that is even comparable to what happened to us due to Polar's betrayal[/quote] The gentlemen thinks otherwise so let him come for his pound of flesh. I have no problems with that. Its just going to get real ugly for him when he does. Edited February 8, 2011 by Feanor Noldorin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shardoon Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1297166224' post='2625579'] Indeed. This is true. This is why TOP declared on Molon Labe. [/quote] It's all about stat collecting, clear and simple. We didn't DOW ML because their slots are full and there was no precious tech and yummy land to be had. Check the stats: http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_display_alliances.asp?Alliance=Molon%20Labe EDIT: on second thought. Maybe we should have considered the tears. Edited February 8, 2011 by Shardoon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1297166224' post='2625579'] Indeed. This is true. This is why TOP declared on Molon Labe. Oh wait. [/quote] Goldie, I stand corrected. PMoses can't challenge this. Maybe HoT or RV though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louisa Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 [quote name='Zero-One' timestamp='1297072761' post='2623872'] You've been missed [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img] [/quote] I miss you too [img]http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r7/Louisa00/emot-love.gif[/img] but every time I try moving closer some one throws a pancake at me and chases me away. We will have to try to fix this some how. A war is the best place to meet inconspicuously, hidden in the crowds, so we will see what we can do. Also another wish of "have fun, smash a lot of things" to TOP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalaskan Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1297169871' post='2625612'] Everyone was suppose to go in on the night of the attack but they were unable to get enough people online (or something to that effect) so they were going to pick up the counters instead. The entire pre-emptive strike was a joint measure between 7-8 alliances. It wasn't about trying to follow treaties but believe it either way you wish to. The gentlemen thinks otherwise so let him come for his pound of flesh. I have no problems with that. Its just going to get real ugly for him when he does. [/quote] He want's a pound of flesh from Polar, maybe after this he wants it from us though...regardless, he's getting his chance to do that as we speak . Haf...ML is Iron's Ally. (LOL Janax!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoffron X Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 I don't understand why TOP didn't declare war on Polar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted February 8, 2011 Report Share Posted February 8, 2011 Maybe because Polar doesn't have enough top tier for even the alliances are on them now, and it would be a waste? Or TOP likes to play things by the treaty book and doesn't have a 'legitimate entry' there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crymson Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Geoffron X' timestamp='1297206859' post='2626114'] I don't understand why TOP didn't declare war on Polar? [/quote] You're at least consistent in the simpleton nature of your posts, I see. Here are a few reasons: 1) No treaty path. 2) Zero open slots. 3) No help wanted by alliances already engaged. Is that good enough for you? Yeesh. Whatever you may have wanted, we are now at war with alliances allied to your allies. Deal with it. Edited February 9, 2011 by Crymson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hullean Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 well NADC, enjoy getting some more POW's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOLtex Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 [quote name='hullean' timestamp='1297210146' post='2626184'] well NADC, enjoy getting some more POW's [/quote] A well thought out, historically accurate assumption. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoffron X Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 [quote name='Crymson' timestamp='1297209866' post='2626171'] You're at least consistent in the simpleton nature of your posts, I see. Here are a few reasons: 1) No treaty path. 2) Zero open slots. 3) No help wanted by alliances already engaged. Is that good enough for you? Yeesh. Whatever you may have wanted, we are now at war with alliances allied to your allies. Deal with it. [/quote] TOP suddenly cares about treaty paths? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalaskan Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Geoffron X' timestamp='1297218042' post='2626426'] TOP suddenly cares about treaty paths? [/quote] Do you ever give up? Ask question to make TOP look bad, get answer not wanted, ask another...rinse, wash repeat.. You may get lucky one of these times, your persistence is the only thing remotely admirable. Carry on. Edited February 9, 2011 by Chalaskan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feanor Noldorin Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 [quote name='Geoffron X' timestamp='1297206859' post='2626114'] I don't understand why TOP didn't declare war on Polar? [/quote] This war was started because VE has issues with Polar. The initial declaration had nothing to do with us and we are not allied to the Entente therefore we are not at war with Polar. I don't see how this is hard to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulmar Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1297220915' post='2626487'] This war was started because VE has issues with Polar. The initial declaration had nothing to do with us and we are not allied to the Entente therefore we are not at war with Polar. I don't see how this is hard to understand. [/quote] Just so you know, I hear you don't need treaties to DoW someone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crymson Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 [quote name='Sulmar' timestamp='1297221143' post='2626492'] Just so you know, I hear you don't need treaties to DoW someone. [/quote] And here's another dumb comment. Your comparison is very flawed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulmar Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Crymson' timestamp='1297221423' post='2626502'] And here's another dumb comment. Your comparison is very flawed. [/quote] I don't know what you are saying, since I was obviously talking about Sparta DoWing NV. Edited February 9, 2011 by Sulmar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feanor Noldorin Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 [quote name='Sulmar' timestamp='1297221143' post='2626492'] Just so you know, I hear you don't need treaties to DoW someone. [/quote] Polar's decision to mess with the Entente has nothing to do with us. We could declare war and jump right into the battle but it's not *our* battle. Our issues with the NpO will be solved at a later date. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han fei zi Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 Unless Timberland gives in to my demands, I'm against this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Lightning Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 [quote name='hullean' timestamp='1297210146' post='2626184'] well NADC, enjoy getting some more POW's [/quote] [img]http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/5925/eddiemurphyyesnodapprov.gif[/img] Obligatory text... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1297222710' post='2626536'] Polar's decision to mess with the Entente has nothing to do with us. We could declare war and jump right into the battle but it's not *our* battle. Our issues with the NpO will be solved at a later date. [/quote] Get in line scumbag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Chill I Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 (edited) [quote name='AlmightyGrub' timestamp='1297226298' post='2626591'] Get in line scumbag. [/quote] Its not a line its a circle, thats why you getting punched from all sides. TOP being infra huggers as usual, amirite. P.S. Who allowed fuffy off the bench. Edited February 9, 2011 by King Chill I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero-One Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 [quote name='AlmightyGrub' timestamp='1297226298' post='2626591'] Get in line scumbag. [/quote] Thank you Grub. Without you, this war doesn't happen [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img] I hope you're enjoying seeing Polar burn as much as I am [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/ehm.gif[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoffron X Posted February 9, 2011 Report Share Posted February 9, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Chalaskan' timestamp='1297218970' post='2626447'] Do you ever give up? Ask question to make TOP look bad, get answer not wanted, ask another...rinse, wash repeat.. You may get lucky one of these times, your persistence is the only thing remotely admirable. Carry on. [/quote] I'm not attempting to make TOP look bad, believe it or not. You're... doing that... but it's not my goal. [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1297220915' post='2626487'] This war was started because VE has issues with Polar. The initial declaration had nothing to do with us and we are not allied to the Entente therefore we are not at war with Polar. I don't see how this is hard to understand. [/quote] VE could have brought in mutual allies, allowing you to attack Polar and for you to get your revenge. If you truly thought that the war had nothing to do with you, you wouldn't be fighting in the coalition. [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1297222710' post='2626536'] Polar's decision to mess with the Entente has nothing to do with us. We could declare war and jump right into the battle but it's not *our* battle. Our issues with the NpO will be solved at a later date. [/quote] What, are you just gonna wait until they give you a CB? You might be waiting awhile, unless you wanna go the VE route and make one up/set up a trap. Unless you attack merely citing the betrayal, in which case... why didn't you do so much earlier? Even before this war? What I am trying to do is to get TOP to get over their issues with Polar. (Issues that are really stupid, but that's another topic entirely) It ain't gonna work by getting them to sit down together, so I'm trying to get them to beat the crap out of each other so they can go their separate ways. Even that is apparently really hard? Edited February 9, 2011 by Geoffron X Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.