Williambonney Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [IMG]http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z32/enderwiggin_2007/nukes.jpg[/IMG] Over 100,000 nukes in total on bob! Anyone want my 16? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commander thrawn Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 We need a war badly. This proliferation can only end in an environmental disaster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolph Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 Jesus Christ! That's a lot of nukes on Bob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homeboy Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 too many nukes not being used Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurunin Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 hm with over 8,000 MP Wonders i'm surprised there arent more tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squid33 Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 I wonder what would happen to the GRL if all those nukes were used as fast as possible... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horatio Longworth Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 The GRL is giving my nation fish with 3 eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squid33 Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='Horatio Longworth' date='09 June 2010 - 10:50 PM' timestamp='1276149041' post='2331387'] The GRL is giving my nation fish with 3 eyes. [/quote] Oh, those aren't normal... shoot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badpoet Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 Blame NPO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banksy Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='Lurunin' date='10 June 2010 - 06:20 PM' timestamp='1276147224' post='2331353'] hm with over 8,000 MP Wonders i'm surprised there arent more tbh[/quote] Yeah, what the hell? That's a fairly inefficient nuke to MP ratio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadrian Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='Lurunin' date='10 June 2010 - 06:20 AM' timestamp='1276147224' post='2331353'] hm with over 8,000 MP Wonders i'm surprised there arent more tbh [/quote] There must be some kind of mistake...there are a total of 6,814 "nuclear nations". How can there be over 8,000 MP's...? This is just me assuming that if one buys an MP, they are registered as nuclear capable and when they actually buy nukes, that they're registered as nuclear armed. But yes, that is a lot of nukes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred von Tirpitz Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 Hmm i feel the need to add to that total, anyone care to temp me a uranium trade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axolotlia Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 We need a cleansing... err war of to get rid of all those nukes... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewolfe2015 Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 Why are more nations built on Tuesdays than any other day? Why have you not called or written in so long WB? Lastly, if 1% of 1% of the total nukes on Bob were fired right now, what would be the net effect on our lovely GRL? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 Hmm, I think its time for another war. Time to release at least 75% of those nukes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurunin Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='Hadrian' date='10 June 2010 - 04:22 AM' timestamp='1276158113' post='2331457'] There must be some kind of mistake...there are a total of 6,814 "nuclear nations". How can there be over 8,000 MP's...? This is just me assuming that if one buys an MP, they are registered as nuclear capable and when they actually buy nukes, that they're registered as nuclear armed. But yes, that is a lot of nukes. [/quote] the facts dont lie lol: http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/2822/71869951.jpg though i think you may be right on the who "you're only a nuclear nation when you buy your first nuke"....though it'd be incredibly hard to try and prove that on our own w/o a staff/mod telling us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savethecheerleader Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='Hadrian' date='10 June 2010 - 03:22 AM' timestamp='1276158113' post='2331457'] There must be some kind of mistake...there are a total of 6,814 "nuclear nations". How can there be over 8,000 MP's...? This is just me assuming that if one buys an MP, they are registered as nuclear capable and when they actually buy nukes, that they're registered as nuclear armed. But yes, that is a lot of nukes. [/quote] Probably due to nations in the top 5% also owning MP's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 New war rule. Wars cant end until all nukes have been fired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mixoux Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='Alterego' date='10 June 2010 - 02:22 PM' timestamp='1276194116' post='2331855'] New war rule. Wars cant end until all nukes have been fired. [/quote] I dunno, sounds pretty unfair and immoral to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='Badpoet' date='10 June 2010 - 06:00 PM' timestamp='1276153232' post='2331423'] Blame NPO. [/quote] Wut. We have less than 3% of those nukes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 The count of "Nuclear capable" nations only lists all nations in the top 5%, not nations with MPs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher XIII Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='lonewolfe2015' date='10 June 2010 - 10:46 AM' timestamp='1276181179' post='2331642'] Lastly, if 1% of 1% of the total nukes on Bob were fired right now, what would be the net effect on our lovely GRL? [/quote] That would only be 10 nukes, but here goes anyway: GRL is based on the # of nations hit by nukes, not the # of nukes fired, so if we assume that each of the 10 nukes hits a different nation, the GRL would increase by a measly 0.12[img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif[/img] If 0.1% of the total nukes on Bob (100 nukes) were fired, the GRL would increase by 1.2, and 1000 nukes would increase it by 12 Hey! its a pattern![img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/awesome.gif[/img] I will leave you to extrapolate - I've done enough math for today... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewolfe2015 Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='Christopher XIII' date='10 June 2010 - 05:45 PM' timestamp='1276206314' post='2332133'] That would only be 10 nukes, but here goes anyway: GRL is based on the # of nations hit by nukes, not the # of nukes fired, so if we assume that each of the 10 nukes hits a different nation, the GRL would increase by a measly 0.12[img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif[/img] If 0.1% of the total nukes on Bob (100 nukes) were fired, the GRL would increase by 1.2, and 1000 nukes would increase it by 12 Hey! its a pattern![img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/awesome.gif[/img] I will leave you to extrapolate - I've done enough math for today... [/quote] You rock. Now imagine if just 10% were fired on different nations... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 [quote name='Christopher XIII' date='11 June 2010 - 08:45 AM' timestamp='1276206314' post='2332133'] That would only be 10 nukes, but here goes anyway: GRL is based on the # of nations hit by nukes, not the # of nukes fired, so if we assume that each of the 10 nukes hits a different nation, the GRL would increase by a measly 0.12[img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif[/img] If 0.1% of the total nukes on Bob (100 nukes) were fired, the GRL would increase by 1.2, and 1000 nukes would increase it by 12 Hey! its a pattern![img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/awesome.gif[/img] I will leave you to extrapolate - I've done enough math for today... [/quote] If only there was 100,000 nations, 1200 GRL here we come Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hepzibah3 Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 This is truly incredible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.