Ebony Wings Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Could this optional treaty network forming around Rebel Virginia be the start of something grander? A political movement? A new super-bloc? Only time will tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 (edited) Really? Why would GDI sign this? Hope it works out I suppose. Edit: Missing question mark Edited July 29, 2009 by Drai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bower3aj Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 why would either want this? Oh right.... Why does GDI want this? I would say both, but RV doesn't really care and will do whatever anyway. Dangerous for GDI, but then again, what's new? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 And I thought Ryan couldn't sink any lower... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Greenberg Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 (edited) RyanGDI continues to go to new levels of pointless threads. Good luck I suppose. Edited July 29, 2009 by Ryan Greenberg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rulesaints Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Ryan why do you do stuff like this to yourself and your alliance? Seriously though, I never thought I'd see GDI and Fail in the same sentence, oh, wait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanGDI Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Ryan why do you do stuff like this to yourself and your alliance?Seriously though, I never thought I'd see GDI and Fail in the same sentence, oh, wait. If you're basing your opinion off an acronym, I feel seriously bad for you. Otherwise, you don't quite know RV. I've gained quite a bit of respect for him, and he's on the same side as Dyno (of whom we're actually friends with in case you got too carried away in drama) at least as far as Sileath goes. Besides, we both play the game differently than most, so we felt it as fit to create a unity between our two forces. Don't like it? Tough. Deal with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rulesaints Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Of course I'm not basing my comments on the name of RV's "alliance", it's actually quite apt. In fact I do respect you, you somehow manage to gain a lot of admiration from many people on here as well as run an alliance with a solid number of members whilst doing things like this... I appreciate that you do things differently to most but still somehow manage to hold things together. You have me confused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 I think RV is just taking you for a ride myself. RV is quite a character. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanGDI Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Of course I'm not basing my comments on the name of RV's "alliance", it's actually quite apt.In fact I do respect you, you somehow manage to gain a lot of admiration from many people on here as well as run an alliance with a solid number of members whilst doing things like this... I appreciate that you do things differently to most but still somehow manage to hold things together. You have me confused. Well then, why the negative comments if you think GDI and FAIL aren't bad? Unless you forgot to add the [sarcasm] tags. I think RV is just taking you for a ride myself.RV is quite a character. Time, lulz, and character will tell. I'm willing to give this a shot through, we'll see where it goes. After all, we made it an "O" for a reason...so in the event of total fiasco on one side, both alliances don't get destroyed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 "This is deeply concerning... why must my enemies always have to wear those ridiculous ties?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Why does RV need to be told that he is allowed to attack with/defend GDI? He would just do it anyway if he felt like it. RV signing optional treaties is as much a waste of time as ODN signing mutual ones. I admit I LOL'd it's true though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeCoHo Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 (edited) This will end well. Also, After all, we made it an "O" for a reason...so in the event of total fiasco on one side, both alliances don't get destroyed. So your saying that if RV is going to get curb stomped, you're not going to help him? Edited July 29, 2009 by NeCoHo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facade Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 After all, we made it an "O" for a reason...so in the event of total fiasco on one side, both alliances don't get destroyed. It's nice to know you won't defend your allies when they really need you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Time, lulz, and character will tell. I'm willing to give this a shot through, we'll see where it goes. After all, we made it an "O" for a reason...so in the event of total fiasco on one side, both alliances don't get destroyed. Once again, your lack of common sense is unbelievable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamemaster1 Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Instead of signing treaties, why aren't you joining Crimson Guard? Oh, shoo. Let them have their fun. Why does RV need to be told that he is allowed to attack with/defend GDI? He would just do it anyway if he felt like it. RV signing optional treaties is as much a waste of time as ODN signing mutual ones. So true. Haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill n ted Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 When will GDI learn? Probably never? Congrats I guess to RV, may you make GDI dance a merry tune. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakeZula Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Once again, your lack of common sense is unbelievable. If you're going to call someone an idiot, it's best that you backup your reasoning. Else, you just end up looking like more of a fool than the person you're commenting on. You seem to be an attackdog for all things even related to RV. What's funny is that no one seems to care because you haven't done anything to him, his allies, his friends, or anything that you've been insulting (unless you count !@#$%*ing and moaning as an attack). GDI you've been pretty cool lately, RV is possibly the best ally you could gain at the moment. To all who are commenting on Ryan's post about the 'O' in his treaty, I believe he means that if one side is totally playing the other, the side that get's 'played' still has the option to deny his or her treaty partner. You know this as well, but of course as CN it's your job to twist words around and into your favor, even when they make you lose any and all respect from someone who used to at one point have some for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 If you're going to call someone an idiot, it's best that you backup your reasoning. Else, you just end up looking like more of a fool than the person you're commenting on. You seem to be an attackdog for all things even related to RV. What's funny is that no one seems to care because you haven't done anything to him, his allies, his friends, or anything that you've been insulting (unless you count !@#$%*ing and moaning as an attack). GDI you've been pretty cool lately, RV is possibly the best ally you could gain at the moment. To all who are commenting on Ryan's post about the 'O' in his treaty, I believe he means that if one side is totally playing the other, the side that get's 'played' still has the option to deny his or her treaty partner. You know this as well, but of course as CN it's your job to twist words around and into your favor, even when they make you lose any and all respect from someone who used to at one point have some for you. OOC: first off please ignore the spelling mistakes, I'm using a phone and its a touch. IC: oh look...another rv drone. Are you basically telling me too shut up or do something about it? RV the best ally? What are you smoking sir??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdnss69 Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 I was expecting something more sensational from you Ryan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathias Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Time, lulz, and character will tell. I'm willing to give this a shot through, we'll see where it goes. After all, we made it an "O" for a reason...so in the event of total fiasco on one side, both alliances don't get destroyed. That's the reason ODPs never really caught on. Nice to see you're not really dedicated to your new allies Ryan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidel Israeli Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 (edited) RV the best ally? What are you smoking sir??? I believe he said best ally he could gain at the moment. Lets face it, not many people are dumb enough to ally with GDI. On a second note, with RV by their side, GDI may not completely fail. Edited July 29, 2009 by Infidel Israeli Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Wowzers!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakeZula Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 OOC: first off please ignore the spelling mistakes, I'm using a phone and its a touch.IC: oh look...another rv drone. Are you basically telling me too shut up or do something about it? RV the best ally? What are you smoking sir??? RV Drone? Because I have an opinion that differs from yours? If being an RV drone means I disagree with you then yes, please, classify me an 'RV Drone'. I'm telling you that no one will care about anything you say until you do something about it, which you probably wouldn't. Why do I think this? You seem like one of those little characters who just whine and complain without doing much of anything, those people who think that they can influence others solely on their single voice into doing work that they probably could atleast attempt to do themselves. Maybe I'm wrong. Who knows. Please, prove me to be wrong. I'd enjoy it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanadrin Failing Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Whoever wrote it obviously cannot count and lives in a world where you count "1, 1, 2, 3". It is clear that this treaty was originally written on a Fibonacci Spiral before being transcribed digitally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.