Drostan Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 That's not true. This was discussed privately two nights ago, with TDO included. I am just saying that these logs don't make NSO look overly cooperative with initiating these talks: [23:06] <Warbuck[TDO]> -Doppelganger, New Sith Order [23:07] <TehChron> ... [23:07] <TehChron> Well damn [23:07] <TehChron> I cant overrule doppelganger [23:08] <Warbuck[TDO]> The question is whether or not this was from doppelganger, or if Viktor is trying to stir some !@#$ up [23:08] <TehChron> If he sent it, its NSO policy then. [23:08] <TehChron> Ah... [23:08] <TehChron> Its pretty well written [23:08] <TehChron> I wouldnt be surprised if he or someone else of that level had written it [23:09] <Warbuck[TDO]> Well, could you do me the favor of confirming whether or not this is in fact from Doppelganger? [23:10] <Warbuck[TDO]> is he currently around- I see him in the room [23:10] <TehChron> Just did, and it seems to be QUOTE [23:19] <TehChron> Ah, speaking of Ivan...you likely wont be able to find him on irc with any convenience [23:19] <TehChron> He never joins any public rooms [23:19] <TehChron> So going through me would likely be a more efficient method [23:19] <Warbuck[TDO]> ok... I will contact you then directly [23:20] <Warbuck[TDO]> thank you for your help QUOTE 02:52 Cheyenne I am a member of the Darth Council. 02:52 Heft I am a Sith Lord, Cheyenne is a Prophet 02:52 Heft Both of us are on the Darth Council 02:52 Sethb[OV] Ok 02:52 Heft Which is the body directly beneath ivan 02:53 Beauchamp|TDO I was, personally, hoping to speak to Ivan himself. QUOTE 02:57 Heft The messages in this instance were authorized 02:57 Roo[GOP] So you're asserting that they were, indeed, authorized acts of aggression? 02:57 shaneprice[GGA] And why would the NSO authorize such a message? 02:58 Heft THey were an attempt to inform nations of some of the choices they may have beyond simple neutrality 02:58 shaneprice[GGA] The recruitment messages were directed towards sovereign alliances... 02:58 RudeBoy well, evidently you're the only ones to perceive it that way 02:58 Heft Neutral alliances 02:59 Roo[GOP] that doesn't address the fact that poaching allied nations is an act of aggression 02:59 RudeBoy i'm quite positive they know there's more to CN then neutrality 02:59 RudeBoy hell, there's a big "declare war" button 02:59 RudeBoy there's a war option 02:59 Heft Yes, well, that would be correct, RudeBoy 02:59 RudeBoy most of the game revolves around building up military 02:59 shaneprice[GGA] They are still sovereign and entitled to self-defense. 02:59 Roo[GOP] Hell, I received a recruitment message and I'm the founder of the GOP 02:59 Heft We did not discriminate based upon position, no That seems like a fairly earnest attempt to get in touch with NSO government to me. And it seems like they got a bit of a run-around. My point is that you cannot say that TDO did not try to negotiate with NSO's government on this issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 It's too bad we don't qualify B) Oh, no...after this douchbaggary I'd say you are the number 1 contender by a LONG SHOT... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayOvfEnnay Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 So I haven't read the entire thread...has the apology demand accepted? If it hasn't till now, I'd be bit surprised if it came at all then. What cards does neutral menace has to play?I'm enjoying the change from the peanut gallery Apology demand accepted for TDO: No. What TDO can do about it: Two options; Absolutely nothing. Attempt to fight a war against the entire Frostbite bloc. You think people recruiting from you is a detrimental act? Imagine war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 Oh, no...after this douchbaggary I'd say you are the number 1 contender by a LONG SHOT... That sounds like opinion rather than fact. Maybe for YOUR asshat awards... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proxian Empire Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 I'm enjoying this little round of words being placed in the mouths of Frostbite leadership. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venom4Viper Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 (edited) :o :o :o Edited July 3, 2009 by Venom4Viper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heracles the Great Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 We don't do it. That should give you a clue about where my alliance stands on the issue. I personally don't see it as a reason to go to war. Not doing it doesn't mean you do or do not condone it. And if it's not an aggressive attack against the sovereignty of an alliance then what do you consider it to be? And if you do it consider it to be an aggressive attack against the sovereignty of an alliance, how do you not see it as a reason to go to war? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drostan Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 (edited) So, if this were to come to war, would FrostBite in fact weigh in against TDO? I ask this for clarity, I am not implying that they will. Edited July 3, 2009 by Drostan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enderland Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 So, if this were to come to war, would FrostBite in fact weigh in against TDO?I ask this for clarity, I am not implying that they will. Grub made a post earlier that seemed to imply the only way to find out NpO's involvement in a war here would be to actually DoW NSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omfghi2u2 Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 I'm wondering why everyone who thinks this is a-ok is ignoring the fact that the Sith have already apologised for the same message sent to another alliance. If the Sith have such conviction that they have done nothing wrong, why did they respond to one demand for a public apology so drastically different to another by, you know, apologising publicly? Something doesn't click, here. Well, at least this post was ignored. -omfg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Terra Di Agea Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 Oh, well done NSO, well done. Can I nominate you guys for the "Asshats of the Year award"? I at least, would wear that badge with pride. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 Well, at least this post was ignored.-omfg Well, of course. What did you expect, the truth? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uaciaut Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 Someone is rushing things too much really. Oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 That sounds like opinion rather than fact. Maybe for YOUR asshat awards... Really? I'd say quite a few people would agree with me... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Frontier Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 I am just saying that these logs don't make NSO look overly cooperative with initiating these talks: [23:06] <Warbuck[TDO]> -Doppelganger, New Sith Order [23:07] <TehChron> ... [23:07] <TehChron> Well damn [23:07] <TehChron> I cant overrule doppelganger [23:08] <Warbuck[TDO]> The question is whether or not this was from doppelganger, or if Viktor is trying to stir some !@#$ up [23:08] <TehChron> If he sent it, its NSO policy then. [23:08] <TehChron> Ah... [23:08] <TehChron> Its pretty well written [23:08] <TehChron> I wouldnt be surprised if he or someone else of that level had written it [23:09] <Warbuck[TDO]> Well, could you do me the favor of confirming whether or not this is in fact from Doppelganger? [23:10] <Warbuck[TDO]> is he currently around- I see him in the room [23:10] <TehChron> Just did, and it seems to be QUOTE [23:19] <TehChron> Ah, speaking of Ivan...you likely wont be able to find him on irc with any convenience [23:19] <TehChron> He never joins any public rooms [23:19] <TehChron> So going through me would likely be a more efficient method [23:19] <Warbuck[TDO]> ok... I will contact you then directly [23:20] <Warbuck[TDO]> thank you for your help QUOTE 02:52 Cheyenne I am a member of the Darth Council. 02:52 Heft I am a Sith Lord, Cheyenne is a Prophet 02:52 Heft Both of us are on the Darth Council 02:52 Sethb[OV] Ok 02:52 Heft Which is the body directly beneath ivan 02:53 Beauchamp|TDO I was, personally, hoping to speak to Ivan himself. QUOTE 02:57 Heft The messages in this instance were authorized 02:57 Roo[GOP] So you're asserting that they were, indeed, authorized acts of aggression? 02:57 shaneprice[GGA] And why would the NSO authorize such a message? 02:58 Heft THey were an attempt to inform nations of some of the choices they may have beyond simple neutrality 02:58 shaneprice[GGA] The recruitment messages were directed towards sovereign alliances... 02:58 RudeBoy well, evidently you're the only ones to perceive it that way 02:58 Heft Neutral alliances 02:59 Roo[GOP] that doesn't address the fact that poaching allied nations is an act of aggression 02:59 RudeBoy i'm quite positive they know there's more to CN then neutrality 02:59 RudeBoy hell, there's a big "declare war" button 02:59 RudeBoy there's a war option 02:59 Heft Yes, well, that would be correct, RudeBoy 02:59 RudeBoy most of the game revolves around building up military 02:59 shaneprice[GGA] They are still sovereign and entitled to self-defense. 02:59 Roo[GOP] Hell, I received a recruitment message and I'm the founder of the GOP 02:59 Heft We did not discriminate based upon position, no That seems like a fairly earnest attempt to get in touch with NSO government to me. And it seems like they got a bit of a run-around. My point is that you cannot say that TDO did not try to negotiate with NSO's government on this issue. I'd like to point out that Chron isn't actually a member of the Council and has no policy making power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 What cards does neutral menace has to play? From the look of things, their cards seem to be most of the aqua team right now. Grub made a post earlier that seemed to imply the only way to find out NpO's involvement in a war here would be to actually DoW NSO He does like to leave us hanging, doesn't he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 Wow, 25 pages and I haven't even posted yet. Funny. Well, I can't be bothered to read 25 pages over this. It isn't that important. First, I authorized the message. Period. Me. Second, I didn't actually expect anyone to come over from it so technically it would just be more of a stab at the alliances that perpetrate and support the Great Lie than poaching. Third, I have never stated that alliances can not recruit from the NSO. Feel free. Fourth, obviously this is being made into a bigger deal than is really warranted or justified. Poaching implies some form of proprietary position in regards to an alliance's membership. I believe that to be an erroneous assumption. Nations volunteer to join an alliance. Once they join they voluntarily agree to follow certain rules or chains of command but they are never beholden to that alliance beyond their willingness to reside there. If they choose to listen to some rambling commentary via a Private Message sent to their nation then that is their right and they are wholly capable of "jumping ship" at any time they wish. Those that go on and on about this being an attack on their sovereignty are really reaching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 (edited) Really? I'd say quite a few people would agree with me... I don't see anyone talking about asshat awards Edited July 3, 2009 by Griff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesterxo Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 I'd like to point out that Chron isn't actually a member of the Council and has no policy making power. And when we go to your chan and thats what we hear, how are we supposed to know that? And he isn't making a power move, he is just assisting in confusing us and throwing up smoke screens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drostan Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 I'd like to point out that Chron isn't actually a member of the Council and has no policy making power. That's fair but it's a bit distressing that someone with no executive power would take it upon himself to be the mediator between the alliance's leader and another alliance's disgruntled leader in such a situation. I am not saying that NSO was privately mean and snarky as I have no access to those records. I am simply stating that it looks to me like TDO attempted to take this issue up with NSO's government and were led astray by perhaps people who were not in a position to field TDO's inquiries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 (edited) o/ the neutral menace, hope they DO something about it. Edited July 3, 2009 by Ricardo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 My favorite part in all this is how all the NSO members are wearing the TDO tag while mocking TDO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GulagArchipelago Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 Wow, 25 pages and I haven't even posted yet. Funny.Well, I can't be bothered to read 25 pages over this. It isn't that important. First, I authorized the message. Period. Me. Second, I didn't actually expect anyone to come over from it so technically it would just be more of a stab at the alliances that perpetrate and support the Great Lie than poaching. Third, I have never stated that alliances can not recruit from the NSO. Feel free. Fourth, obviously this is being made into a bigger deal than is really warranted or justified. Poaching implies some form of proprietary position in regards to an alliance's membership. I believe that to be an erroneous assumption. Nations volunteer to join an alliance. Once they join they voluntarily agree to follow certain rules or chains of command but they are never beholden to that alliance beyond their willingness to reside there. If they choose to listen to some rambling commentary via a Private Message sent to their nation then that is their right and they are wholly capable of "jumping ship" at any time they wish. Those that go on and on about this being an attack on their sovereignty are really reaching. The New Moldavi Doctrine? Poaching being Legalized?!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electron Sponge Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 I am just saying that these logs don't make NSO look overly cooperative with initiating these talks: <snip> That seems like a fairly earnest attempt to get in touch with NSO government to me. And it seems like they got a bit of a run-around. My point is that you cannot say that TDO did not try to negotiate with NSO's government on this issue. It looks like their fairly earnest attempt succeeded. Who do you think they were talking to in the private talks? lol TDO wanted to talk directly to Moldavi, which really isn't something that happens often as he doesn't use that medium of communication as regularly as some people. He wasn't available so they got the highest ranking people that were around. I'm not sure why that's a problem. I never said TDO didn't try to negotiate - what I am saying is that TDO is mischaracterizing NSO's actions in the talks as hostile and disrespectful, and are blatantly lying about NSO admitting that this was some sort of act of aggression. So as not to put too fine a point on this, it seems that TDO is bent out of shape because GOP got an apology and they didn't. It seem to be less about something the Sith did and more "what about me?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WcaesarD Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 The way I see it, the NSO messages were clearly not jokes, or they wouldn't have been sent to the alliances in the game LEAST likely to respond. They most certainly look like an agressive act of war to me, and I would repond accordingly and immediately. I don't mean I would declare war, because that would be premature. But I would open talks between the alliance leaders in real-time. There is no excuse for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.