Monster Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 That kind of hurts man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsoxbronco1 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1330914436' post='2933581'] C&G obviously. How is this a real question? [/quote] [img]http://www.mascotcoalition.org/education/movies/training_day_images/denzel_intro.jpg[/img] I concur with you whole heartedly my African-American brother C&G's strength comes from the fact that all members place the well being of their bloc allies before ALL else. Edited March 5, 2012 by rsoxbronco1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Roq remember when I told you we didn't hold a grudge after DH/NPO? I meant it. I also meant it when I said the NPO doesn't see any "enemies" at this point. Oh don't get me wrong I am sure they are out there. I am sure they are plotting. The thing is they will find the NPO is constantly and diligently working. For the shocking record, the NPO still has no problem talking to any alliance. Even through disagreements with GOD, we can still talk, same goes for FARK, Sparta, Polaris, STA, (wait let me move to the other side) TOP, Iron, Umbrella (hi natan), ODN, VE, GOONS and etc etc etc etc. We are talking about me personally visiting. Each of those has possibilities. The NPO has too deep a history to not logically look at it and paint a canvas of its choosing. We are the NPO and we are still here. Order from chaos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 (edited) Except Brehon, and I avoided bringing this out, you did identify an enemy on Sparta's boards. Not by name, but by description. Edited March 5, 2012 by Roquentin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1330916320' post='2933612'] Except Brehon, and I avoided bringing this out, you did identify an enemy on Sparta's boards. [/quote] They have the greatest potential, fair enough. We are very aware some historical enemies could "turn" on us. I have no doubt if it benefited them they would. /wave MK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsoxbronco1 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Why would we want to destroy an alliance we now control? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankees Empire Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Wait...Athens was part of the merger to form TLR? BRB cancelling CnG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Considering CnG was an MK created project, but even after MK left the bloc they still let MK lead them around makes them seem like an DH pet at times. Although with this treaty they are better positioning themselves so they don't need to be so reliant on MK to lead them in their FA policies, so I'm actually happy to see this treaty. I'm pretty sure MK was against the ODP when TLR signed that with NPO, so I think its good to see this relationship strengthened as long as NPO doesn't start becoming an MK puppet due to this, but my gut feeling tells me its those who don't want their FA policies to revolve around MK that pushed this treaty and NPO has no plans to led MK lead them around, which is why I give my congrats to both alliances on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankees Empire Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Also ITT: People don't understand how CnG works. Shocking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsoxbronco1 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1330916986' post='2933623'] Considering CnG was an MK created project, but even after MK left the bloc they still let MK lead them around makes them seem like an DH pet at times. Although with this treaty they are better positioning themselves so they don't need to be so reliant on MK to lead them in their FA policies, so I'm actually happy to see this treaty. I'm pretty sure MK was against the ODP when TLR signed that with NPO, so I think its good to see this relationship strengthened as long as NPO doesn't start becoming an MK puppet due to this, but my gut feeling tells me its those who don't want their FA policies to revolve around MK that pushed this treaty and NPO has no plans to led MK lead them around, which is why I give my congrats to both alliances on this. [/quote] 'pretty sure' 'I think' 'my gut feeling' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 (edited) [quote name='rsoxbronco1' timestamp='1330917458' post='2933631'] 'pretty sure' 'I think' 'my gut feeling' [/quote] Of course only the ones in TLR and NPO who were pushing this treaty know the real reasons and goals behind it, so of course I'm just speculating. Edited March 5, 2012 by Methrage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phineas Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Whatever this ends up representing, if something or even nothing, when the cards of some future hand are called, at least it's interesting from many competing angles today and I welcome that. I'm terrible at poker, so there's also that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Boris Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1330906360' post='2933451'] Well..who comes first within ODN's list of allies. MK or CnG? [/quote] Clearly they're going to place priority on the MADPs over the MDoAPs. Or in terms you might comprehend easier, Ho's before Bros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1330916986' post='2933623'] Considering CnG was an MK created project, but even after MK left the bloc they still let MK lead them around makes them seem like an DH pet at times. Although with this treaty they are better positioning themselves so they don't need to be so reliant on MK to lead them in their FA policies, so I'm actually happy to see this treaty. I'm pretty sure [b]MK was against the ODP when TLR signed that with NPO[/b], so I think its good to see this relationship strengthened as long as NPO doesn't start becoming an MK puppet due to this, but my gut feeling tells me its those who don't want their FA policies to revolve around MK that pushed this treaty and NPO has no plans to led MK lead them around, which is why I give my congrats to both alliances on this. [/quote] you have no idea what you are talking about. especially for the bolded part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 I don't know why considering MK themselves put up an ODP with us. But whatever. People will always speculate and assume things /shrugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 (edited) I mentioned that before. ODN was the main source of opposition. Edited March 5, 2012 by Roquentin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankees Empire Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1330918363' post='2933643'] I don't know why considering MK themselves put up an ODP with us. But whatever. People will always speculate and assume things /shrugs. [/quote] Reverse psychology? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1330916986' post='2933623'] Considering CnG was an MK created project, but even after MK left the bloc they still let MK lead them around makes them seem like an DH pet at times. Although with this treaty they are better positioning themselves so they don't need to be so reliant on MK to lead them in their FA policies, so I'm actually happy to see this treaty. I'm pretty sure MK was against the ODP when TLR signed that with NPO, so I think its good to see this relationship strengthened as long as NPO doesn't start becoming an MK puppet due to this, but my gut feeling tells me its those who don't want their FA policies to revolve around MK that pushed this treaty and NPO has no plans to led MK lead them around, which is why I give my congrats to both alliances on this. [/quote] I don't know where you're getting your info, but we, on the whole (leaving room for minority opinions), did not oppose the ODP. Edited March 5, 2012 by Azaghul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trimm Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1330919848' post='2933661'] I don't know where you're getting your info, but we, on the whole (leaving room for minor exceptions), did not oppose the ODP. [/quote] Did you oppose the upgrade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsoxbronco1 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='trimm' timestamp='1330919972' post='2933662'] Did you oppose the upgrade? [/quote] Who do you think gave TLR permission to sign? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enamel32 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='rsoxbronco1' timestamp='1330920071' post='2933663'] Who do you think gave TLR permission to sign? [/quote] This is a joke right? *insert futurama: can't tell if you're serious meme* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='trimm' timestamp='1330919972' post='2933662'] Did you oppose the upgrade? [/quote] Is this directed at me personally? If so the answer is no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogenes Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1330920530' post='2933668'] Is this directed at me personally? If so the answer is no. [/quote] And if it is directed at our alliance, the answer is also no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 (edited) I already said they didn't and offered NPO an ODP. I don't drink tigerblood. I only drink shots of truth and chase them with Bawls(paraphrase of someone else). edit: wrong link http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=14800&st=0&p=407298&#entry407298 fixed. Edited March 5, 2012 by Roquentin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avery du Troiseau Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1330916986' post='2933623'] Considering CnG was an MK created project, but even after MK left the bloc they still let MK lead them around makes them seem like an DH pet at times. Although with this treaty they are better positioning themselves so they don't need to be so reliant on MK to lead them in their FA policies, so I'm actually happy to see this treaty. I'm pretty sure MK was against the ODP when TLR signed that with NPO, so I think its good to see this relationship strengthened as long as NPO doesn't start becoming an MK puppet due to this, but my gut feeling tells me its those who don't want their FA policies to revolve around MK that pushed this treaty and NPO has no plans to led MK lead them around, which is why I give my congrats to both alliances on this. [/quote] Nobody put a quarter in you Methrage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts