Dre4mwe4ver

Agreed. And "A Specific Dispute" is not good enough.

I'd like to verify the fabulousity of Ogaden's hair.

There was a bambi sighting, and therefore, I've come to hail :|

Does it, though? Does it really?

It is surely a matter of opinion and perspective, but one can easily "cite [you] being involved in aggressive action." Everyone defines "aggressive action" differently. I would consider starting a global war by declaring an aggressive war alongside two allies to be "aggressive action," while you, no doubt, would see it as defensive, due to the CB which you deem valid. Either way, it's probably best not to deal in absolutes.

I hope this isn't a paid endorsement. Professionals usually use success stories to advertise their services.

ITT: People to busy arguing that they're not puppets to notice their strings being pulled. Aka, nothing new.

Not gonna lie, the more I think about it, the funnier it gets.

I wasn't referring to you, mate, as I don't recall you complaining. But yes, we both know, indeed. I may not always recognize the legitimacy of your assertions nor agree with your choice of battles all the time, but at least you choose to battle, and that cannot be denied. I expect nothing less.

Drink everytime someone complains about PM. Drink everytime someone complains about CBs or the lack thereof. Drink everytime someone complains about lulzism... Actually, this is easier: Drink everytime someone says shit they don't have the guts to actually do anything about, other than gasp in indignant outrage.

Now, this is the government GATO needs. o/ GATO

Don't buy all that tech at once, because the price of tech increases the more you have. Instead of wasting your money on buying expensive tech, keep the cash that is "on loan," as you phrase it, and intended for the tech in cash form, until you've already sent one batch of 100 tech, at which time, you'll be able to rebuy that 100 tech at the optimal price.

I am fond of your Cheddar Bay Biscuits.

I see two flags, and refuse to believe this is not a treaty. Congratulations!

I see people I like. I shall hail this treaty. o/ this treaty

I'm not entirely clear on the scoring system, but I think DBDC has a lot more points on the board than anyone else right now.

Needs more Bambi :-( But nevertheless, congrats, R&R. I like you.

Some familiar names in this lineup! Congrats! o/

I'm too happy to see awesome stats to complain about SRA not being red. o/ RI5

Aside from the fact that that's not what's happening? If this is "one statement that was made, after the context of said statement has changed," then you are welcome to admit your errors and reestablish a position that you are actually capable of executing. If that were the case, then there is absolutely no point to berate that outdated statement. But when you hold fast to this outdated statement, attempting to twist it as if that statement still holds true, then you're the one who's ignoring the changing context. No, I'm honored you think so highly of me, but I'm afraid it most certainly could happen to me. I am fallible. I would not attempt to harass you with an irrelevant statement, but the the situation you are describing, as far as I am aware, is not the same as the situation that exists. You know me, Kerschbs, or at least I hope you do. I have zero problem with admitting fault if I am wrong, because the truth is more important to me, than some ridiculous illusion of perfection. So if there was at any point prior to this where MI6 admits that their initial policy was made without consideration that it would not be feasible for MI6 to stay true to that policy, and they have thus amended their policy appropriately, rendering the statement in question obsolete, and I have overlooked it, which is most certainly within the realm of possibility, then please point it out to me, because I would rather be corrected, than be wrong and judge MI6 falsely. I am critical because right now, MI6 is going about simultaneously ignoring past statements and trying to twist them to fit the "changed context," rather than being willing to recognize that they are faced with a new situation. I hold MI6 to a standard in that I expect your word to mean something. So, please, mean something. If I were upset, I would've spoken to the parties I'm upset with. But I'm not upset. If you are so upset that MI6's statements and actions have been so inconsistent, then it would be more productive for you to work internally with your government to establish a realistic policy that you can adhere to. This is more than nitpicking and semantics, this is about integrity. But it will never be solved, if you ignore and dismiss it as nitpicking and semantics.

The part that's being blatantly ignored in an attempt, which I'm not sure is more desperate or intellectually insulting, to save face is that Mi6 was "completely disinterested in ever giving" this separate peace that has allegedly been so eagerly and hastily achieved. Y'all seem awfully interested.

A few quick notes: 1) As eager as NG may or may not be to claim credit, it was actually your alliance that came up with the idea to go after the aforementioned ghost in the first place. 2) Your post also happens to be the only one so far to refer to this course of action as a "good idea," even if erroneously attributing it to NG. (Could be two separate notes, but I'll keep things simple for you.) 3) And finally, some good news! It seems you may not have to defer to anyone else as an authority on stupid.

A few points. Crown, it's good to see you. We should talk more. abbas, who the heck voted you out of office? I want names. I'm not comfortable with people fighting on behalf of, about or because of me. Unless it's violent and you're in range. So, make it stop.

Yeah, exactly like it, except for the fact that it's... you know, not. At all. At least, if you understood it properly. Which I'm assuming you did. But I have been known for my generosity.

First, never stop wishing upon a star to become a real alliance whether it be by the wand of a fairy godmother, the fruits of your own labor, or the virtue of my membership. I'm sure you'll get there eventually, dear friend. Second, the R stands for Red, though Screaming Random Asses does have a ring to it. Third, I'd rather waste time for the right reasons, than invest time in the wrong places.