Jump to content

Dre4mwe4ver

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    902

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Dre4mwe4ver

  1. Dre4mwe4ver
    I, for one, support meeting unprovoked acts of aggression with violence.
  2. Dre4mwe4ver
    Good to see this posted. Welcome, TSC!
  3. Dre4mwe4ver
    If I had a stamp of approval, this is where I'd stamp it. Congrats!
  4. Dre4mwe4ver
    Would you look at that. Congrats to those elected! o/ GATO
  5. Dre4mwe4ver
    Congrats to those new (or returned) to gov and good luck to all! Also, the III% is hereby under my protection.
  6. Dre4mwe4ver
    But they were trying to do something left the whole time :(
  7. Dre4mwe4ver
    I'd like to take a moment to say a few words about the Brown Sphere, but I'll just post this instead:
  8. Dre4mwe4ver
    I'm sure you're vey bright.
  9. Dre4mwe4ver
    Best post in the thread so far. o/ kata
  10. Dre4mwe4ver
    Back to the stove?
  11. Dre4mwe4ver
    I hold you accountable for bacon. Congrats!
  12. Dre4mwe4ver
    May it work out as well as the non-aggression clause in PECS: stronger than an MDoAP.
  13. Dre4mwe4ver
    No filler, all killer. Congrats!
  14. Dre4mwe4ver
    I like monsters. Congrats!
  15. Dre4mwe4ver
    I need a translator.
  16. Dre4mwe4ver
    Not sure what's wrong with down declaring hundreds of thousands of NS when your opponent doesn't have any other nations in your range. Granted, I generally up declared, but that's because my opponents happen to have nations bigger than me and I'm an idiot. But the only thing worse than people complaining about peace mode is people using peace mode while complaining about peace mode. So... Basically, there's not much that's worse than people complaining about peace mode, but there's a lot of people trying to be.
  17. Dre4mwe4ver
    I've always been a huge proponent of war time tech dealing. There are three primary resources being exchanged in a tech deal: cash, tech and time. When a tech deal is paid for, the payment includes the shipping and handling for a timely delivery. Given the slot restrictions, time is perhaps the most important of these resources. To attempt to restrict the delivery of tech that has already been paid for is a form of theft. At the same time, it is fully within the rights of any alliance to regard any aid (or any action, for that matter) as a valid reason to respond with an escalation to military action, and the risk of such response is heightened when there is a war involving one or more of the tech dealing parties. No party has any obligation to renege upon a tech deal due to there being a state of war. That said, to engage in mid war tech dealing is to assume the risks that come with it. You may not be guilty of any crime, but nor should you be paying the victim card.
  18. Dre4mwe4ver
    Not sure which is worse: Attacking without a CB but with a DoW, or attacking with a CB but without a DoW. All of y'all need to get your shit together.
  19. Dre4mwe4ver
    Gotta do what you gotta do. Let us know if you need anything. Best of luck to all involved parties.
  20. Dre4mwe4ver
    We only keep Smurth around because he knows the coordinates of more NPL bunkers with stockpiles of Nukabeers :|
  21. Dre4mwe4ver
    Best "Cyber Nations Awards 2014" thread?
  22. Dre4mwe4ver
    No, I've always been lazy, not just now. I've never claimed not to be. Anyway, you're right: that is beside the point. May you fight a good fight. Also, I missed the memo where you made gov. Congrats!
  23. Dre4mwe4ver
    Invicta had it coming. Dressed that way and cantering around, the bloody stallion.
  24. Dre4mwe4ver
    Which is naturally why you joined an alliance that supported them. Keep up the good fight. o/
  25. Dre4mwe4ver
    And with that post.... Invicta just started losing popular support.
×
×
  • Create New...