Jump to content

Dre4mwe4ver

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    902

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Dre4mwe4ver

  1. Dre4mwe4ver
    I blame Rish.
  2. Dre4mwe4ver
    Is it bad if I can't tell if this is the best or the worst Polar has to offer?
  3. Dre4mwe4ver
    Actually, if that's the type of environment he's constantly in, it explains an awful lot.
  4. Dre4mwe4ver
    Sorry. Yes. No.
  5. Dre4mwe4ver
    I'm low-key hoping you're referring to eQ with this one, because that would make my day.
  6. Dre4mwe4ver
    This is disgusting and the person who wrote it ought to be ashamed of himself. Verified as not a forgery. Good questions. It's your ass. Do as you please, as long as it doesn't involve my ass without my consent.
  7. Dre4mwe4ver
    I still prefer the Hershey-Nascar War
  8. Dre4mwe4ver
    Was gonna say plants, but then we wouldn't have beef. :|
  9. Dre4mwe4ver
    I'm actually rather ashamed that this slipped my mind. :(
  10. Dre4mwe4ver
    We're on the same page.
  11. Dre4mwe4ver
    I feel like more attention should be paid to this thread. Congrats to those elected and o/ RIA
  12. Dre4mwe4ver
    In all fairness, you're the only reason I know who Sengoku is.
  13. Dre4mwe4ver
    Doom Squad, obviously.
  14. Dre4mwe4ver
    It is just as "silly," if not more so, to suppose that you have the authority, by your definitions, to dictate the intent behind anothers' actions. When your interpretation of others' actions does not fit with the reality, while you are free to hold that interpretation and act upon it, it is not your interpretation that holds true. Does this declaration of war against an alliance of one coalition in defense of one in another act and serve as support for the latter? In its functionality, it most certainly can, I do not contest you there, but the intent and purpose of the action remains independent, as we are free to, and willing to exercise that freedom, to adjust the manner of our involvement based on our own interests, and no one else's. You claim this thinking is "reduced," but when you insist on polarizing parties into for or against and insist on binding their allegiance to coalitions, you strip away individuality and the sovereignty in favor of a mob mentality for the coalition. You dress it up to appear like more than it is by the blanket and mindless application the "causes" of each coalition, but you diminish the situation into nothing more than us vs them. And if the coalition serves their purpose, then that is most excellent for them. But if not, then you attempt to reduce them. You reduce them into something simpler. Bound into a binary, because that is easier to attempt to control. Slaves to the coalition. And when we refuse to be simplified, refuse to comply with your broken vision, you condemn us with "you might reduce your thinking," but perhaps all this reduction has left you confused as to who truly is "reduced." The idea, indeed.
  15. Dre4mwe4ver
    If it were meant to serve that purpose, then I'm not sure if it was too short, too simple, or not enough of each, as the "exact terms" of "the current status of NPO-TSC relations" is now by Imperial Decree: "the New Pacific Order hereby declares war on The Sandstorm Confederacy." Thank you for the clarification.
  16. Dre4mwe4ver
    "The New Pacific Order hereby declares war" doesn't look an awful lot like "simply a recognition of a preexisting fact." Word to the wise would be to pick one story and stick to it. I recommend the OP that has those proud signatures from your government attached, but I can see how the fact that it's contradictory to everything else your coalition is attempting to claim as true makes it the less than preferable choice, so the attempts to lawyer yourself out of this one is understandable.
  17. Dre4mwe4ver
    Must be if you think they'll believe your fairy tales. You're not exactly in a position to speak about rhetoric and reality. Or actually, perhaps the fact that your rhetoric is so twisted explains why you feel like you are.
  18. Dre4mwe4ver
    Take your own advice.
  19. Dre4mwe4ver
    I think it looks pretty.
  20. Dre4mwe4ver
    Sounds fortune cookie-esque. Except, the opposite of fortune.
  21. Dre4mwe4ver
    o/ Kashmir o/ SRA o/ Legion o/ Ass o/ OPSEC
  22. Dre4mwe4ver
    If you wanna start a sanction war, then you shouldn't complain about the consequences of your actions. If you have a problem with a sanction war, then you better be willing to enforce that with some consequences.
  23. Dre4mwe4ver
    I didn't. :|
  24. Dre4mwe4ver
    o/ SPATR Congrats, and may you go forth and do your thing. :| That sounded better in my head.
  25. Dre4mwe4ver
    My favorite part is "Invicta" being shortened to "Invict".
×
×
  • Create New...