Jump to content

Demag

Members
  • Posts

    162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Demag

  1. [quote name='Stealthkill' timestamp='1327867065' post='2909684'] For those wondering, said goals also include "get used", "screw over Ragnarok", and "achieve nominal influence" [/quote] Stop being mean Stealthy just because Super Friends won by being able to stand Ragnarok the longest. Also I should probably point out that Asgaard never joined Mj to roll SF but to have fun regardless of the enmity that was left over from our brief stay on maroon.
  2. [quote name='commander thrawn' timestamp='1326393400' post='2898176'] I paid some guy 9 million like a month and a half ago that was supposed to be for 150-200 tech I believe? I was gonna track someone down about it but then the war got in the way. Oh I looked it up I was dealing with czar lazar. Your move TGE. [/quote] I had the same deal with czar lazar 9 million for 200 tech. Here's the spreadsheet that we were linked to for payment dates you have to click back to November/December: https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=h9tl8jd1q7pqb37dqddr918dg8%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/New_York
  3. [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1323696847' post='2875204'] Not correct. There were other alliances with LoSS you are leaving out - like DT, and maybe even a couple others. Besides LoSS alone had well over 200 nations; with DT, that's about the same as Brain, CSN and R&R combined. It isn't even close, but oh yes. We shouldn't leave out legacy's role though right? Not that they held up their end of the bargain, considering Sarm's claims. [/quote] Here's the timeline for you. TIO declares on SLCB in defense of polar. Hydra declares on TIO in defense of SLCB. LoSS declares on Hydra in defense of TIO. CSN saw an opportunity and declares war on LoSS alongside Legacy one day later The Brain Enters. At this point TIO is at 1 million, Hydra is at 2 million, LoSS around 5 million, CSN at 5.5 million, Legacy at 3.5 million and the Brain at 2 million. So say Hydra counts for 1 million that leave LoSS battling 11 million ns roughly with there top tiers outnumber 3 to 1 with only the bottom tier having the advantage. DT comes in about a week later with 1.7 million NS and declares on Legacy. CSN counter-declares on DT. So CSN side still has 9 million advantage. Now if you want we could also go into Flying Hellfish, GOD and R&R entering but I won't. Now as for Legacy, throughout the war the fought LoSS hard how do I know I was in LoSS gov't and was quite happy fighting them. They may of turtled against DT out of protest but they had no reservation against LoSS. As for nation count CSN, Legacy and The Brain had 280 to LoSS 300. Now LoSS had 200 nations below 10k NS who couldn't make an impact. So man up and fight.
  4. [quote name='EgoFreaky' timestamp='1323662866' post='2874672'] Welcome to the fight Next time us the right area though .. prevents me from looking stoopid because we couldn't find it Have fun. [/quote] They can only do so much Ego, even if they did put it in the right area would you honestly still be able to find it? I'll think we both know the answer. Ego <3 Also go get 'em TSA, RampersandR clearly deserve it for protecting the likes of Stealthy and Ego.
  5. [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1323695515' post='2875187'] Sammy, I'm saying that you needed a 3-1+ advantage for this war, even after an even bigger down-declare hit CSN first and did the easy work for you. That's pretty big, wouldn't you say? I sure do. [/quote] You do realise CSN did the same thing against LoSS last war with The Brain, CSN, R&R and Legacy.
  6. [quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1322497187' post='2854882'] Once again ill explain this. IF we defend IRON which we have said we would in our DOS it would be entering on the OA clause of our treaty as IRON is the agressor. We support this action against Polar. Its not the same situation. Now im retired and my words dont hold !@#$ as per Val policy but that is my read on the situation. It is specifically why we put ass hat non chain clauses in our treaties. I can understand why RIA is getting called out. They have the option of hitting TOP. Personally I think its a little early for the call outs but they did sign a MDP treaty with Polar and are obligated to defend. Polar is sending out what equates to mosquitos on IRON atm. IRON is more than capable of handling these micros with out anyone elses help. I think RIA will come in they dont let allies burn alone its just not in their DNA as they are DIRECTLY tied to Polar. [/quote] I'm not questioning Valhalla's willingness to defend their allies, I was merely putting the shoe on the other foot for Bob Ilyani's benefit then anything else. Though I'm not sure why Valhalla would be going via their OA clause when they could still activate there defense clause but that's just semantics.
  7. [quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1322467466' post='2854665'] Good point. Glad to see you're still around. [/quote] I appear from time to time. [quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1322491976' post='2854830'] Our MDP partner was not attacked. NPO was attacked and we would in no way shape or form defend them at the time. Our direct treaty partners were well aware of this stance and it was discussed at great length with them. But if you can come up with a treaty between NPO and Valhalla then I will concede your point. Ill save you the time YOU CANT. Difference RIA signed a MDP with Polar with full knowledge of the baggage that comes with it. So please dig around and find an example that actually fits the scenerio. [/quote] I was referencing this current war with IRON being attacked then some past event and it wasn't a dig at Valhalla, to be honest I could of listed DAWN or Argent, but to point out these ridiculous call outs on RIA when there are more than one alliances mutual defense clause being activated that haven't entered yet.
  8. [quote name='Bob Ilyani' timestamp='1322461561' post='2854517'] Maybe we're all just wondering why a treaty that preaches Mutual Defense is doing exactly the opposite. [/quote] Then we better look to Duckroll and erstwhile allies Valhalla and ask them the same questions, though we both know the reason why. Considering RIA fought on two sides just so they could defend you I'm not sure why your questioning RIAs willingness to go to war for an ally.
  9. The long arduous upgrade discussion over and these are the terrible results.
  10. 34,-72 yields 98%; [img]http://i.imgur.com/Qmouj.png[/img]
  11. Congrats TSA and Grievous, though DoW jokes are old.
  12. [quote name='Leet Guy' timestamp='1317231877' post='2810321'] Kiss of death if I've ever seen one. (no pun intended) [/quote] Considering the previous members of LoSS' various governments I really doubt it. Anyway, congrats LoSS on the new government.
  13. [quote name='gambona' timestamp='1311384660' post='2761645'] How did the cat feel about this? When asked all it did was grin and nod. [/quote] And I though Cheshire was secretly a typewriting monkey. o/
  14. [quote name='Micheal Malone' timestamp='1311059076' post='2759111'] Figures the one mistake I made was in the commentary fixed [/quote] [i]Multicolored Cross-X Alliance [/i]in the comments should be in blue
  15. [quote name='Exige' timestamp='1310124684' post='2752312'] both these alliances suck [/quote] ^ This. They even prove this by how long they took to sign. Congrats guys.
  16. I blame Antonio. Congrats, good luck in your new home LEG.
  17. Demag

    That one thread

    NoR should clean up there act because of one person who kept the RL secret and was unknown to them until he was murdered. Please I've seen plenty of racism in various alliances in CN some serious some not serious but to single out NoR for it essential because they have a German theme is daft.
  18. GATO just change your charter and apply to C&G it be far more easier.
  19. Considering The Last Remnants are protecting 3 Alliance Affiliations don't you think it's a bit hypocritical to whine about them being irritated that you share an acronym that they've had a longer history with.
  20. [quote name='Scorponok' timestamp='1308425718' post='2734089'] Who said I was implying DT? [/quote] Who are you implying then? I'm kind of curious, why there's so much expectations of Mjolnir
  21. [quote name='KahlanRahl' timestamp='1308167758' post='2731970'] I can't speak for poaching because that hasn't been going on since I've been in TIO, and I wasn't around for TIO's inception. However LoSS did not say outright they would drop us when I approached them with the notice that we were, to emphasize again, [b]going into talks[/b] with NPO about upgrading our treaty. Phoebua told me they wouldn't be happy, but I never was approached afterward about them dropping us, nor did I see that anyone in our government was approached with a LoSS member saying so. [/quote] I know LoSS government (when I was apart of it) didn't say they would drop you but upgrading your treaty would be an issue and would prefer if you didn't. If was serious issue for LoSS we/they wouldn't of allied to you or IAA in the first place being allied to NpO. Anyway, I'm going to let this drop since no one can change the past.
  22. That doesn't deal with the fact you were poaching or that TIO were specifically told that upgrading the treaty with NPO would be a problem by LoSS, I can't vouch for IAA but I would expect they'd be the same, and was assured that a treaty upgrade wouldn't happen.
  23. [quote name='TheListener' timestamp='1308001997' post='2730764'] You are a wise wise man Vlad, in actuality this was a decision made by all 4 members recognizing that our Foreign Affairs paths were no longer as good of a match as they used to be, hence the dissolution of Synergy as a whole. [/quote] They were never a good match in the first place.
×
×
  • Create New...