Demag

What other crazy shens have you got to IRL? Also when will you use punctuation?

[quote name='Chintan' timestamp='1357024951' post='3070086'] Try these, in this order: (80.00000001, 28) URL Segment: lon=28&lat=80.00000001 (79, 27) URL Segment: lon=27&lat=79 (80.00000001, 27) URL Segment: lon=27&lat=80.00000001 [/quote] First one one produced an error for me. The other two were both at 99%.

[quote name='DoorNail' timestamp='1350592429' post='3042627'] you attacked us, there are no terms..once I defended, we were even and it could've been stopped at anytime before it came to blows by that dipstick you call a leader. [/quote] DoorNail you know how diplomacy works around here. So it's either pursue their terms for a resolution or carry on fighting. Unfortunately your not in a position to change it.

[quote name='Alcoholic' timestamp='1346694492' post='3027645'] Samus, i thought you a smarter man. This tool is kind of useful to use with your motive. Its true potential however is as a war tool, to forever change the blitz. I knew an alliance that has had this tool for a couple of years now, they weren't smart enough to integrate into their target list tool, but they were smart enough to keep it a secret. Now say for example you want to attack TIO, you can use this tool to single out TIO's most active members both in tech deals and in wars, these nations really are the bite of the alliance, the others are just the bark. Take out the bite first, and the bark is meaningless. If all their strong nations are under heavy fire, they will have no one, or at least no one competent, to counter. You should take down the site and start working with your alliance to turn it into the weapon it is, at least thats what i'd do if i were u [/quote] Go back to RL you're not wanted Interesting tool certainly be useful.

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1346027163' post='3025491'] protectorate bloc? me likey [/quote] Someone has to keep AI out of trouble. o/SoA

Our flag changes too much. Anyway nice grouping etc...

[quote name='coldielox' timestamp='1341200806' post='3001546'] this question has been asked over an over since we declared our creation.. learn a new way to poke fun ? seeing as how they have yet to not protect whomever they say they will.. maybe try another weakness.. or ya know just move on not everyone can be as superior as goons [/quote] Hi coldie. Anyway sad disbandment is sad.

D: Things staying private. Anyway good luck HB even if the only person I know is Jache which pretty much means I should hate you with a passion.

So 3 times now if you include their predecessor TUF. Also you guys were allied as well IIRC. How time flies.

Well if you can define what a sub-conflict is then I don't see reason why not too have them but a lot of them are just seem tenuous at times like the Mjolnir - SF front its still part of the TOP/IRON-NpO where as the MHA-C&G and Fark-NPO where pre-empts and can be more easily defined as a sub-conflict as there wasn't a direct relation to the main war initially. I hope this makes sense basically as long as sub-conflicts have decent definition to apply it to I don't see an issue.

At least he's honest and being straight with xr1.

Honestly, DoorNail I don't think it's worth it while TSA was good alliance it's always had it's ups and down since the TCI merge-in and out it seemed to of occurred with increasing frequency when there was any activity. Anyway, good luck with your re-attempt to turn back time. If I can help you let me know.

[quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1337662686' post='2970555'] Sharduke was a great guy. I don't touch all his stuff done in 07/08 though, because I wasn't concerned with the entire world at large. I was more concerned with just securing our immediate protection. TSC really didn't have anything to do with CIS though. Sharduke came over after TCI, and we were allied to The Ravyns. Another Sharduke creation, and one of the alliances we backed up in Karma. [/quote] I was wondering while I didn't remember any of what ConRed said. Wasn't there another alliance before TSC you and Grievous founded? I also remember the TUF-TSC attempted merge :3 I'm pretty certain FoA was thrown in the mix as well at one point. Anyway as the last member of NOVA other than Hazardousdoc and the protectors of TSC. I bid it's offspring farewell and good luck but I'm not surprised it's ended considering it was always Grievous' alliance.

A bike with gears struggles enough where I live in Wales. I don't think a fixed-gear bike cuts it somehow. Certainly learn what a mountain bike is in the valleys.

[quote name='Starfox101' timestamp='1337039315' post='2967503'] Peace will never bring anyone to justice. Secondly, how can you accuse NoR of rattling sabers when LSF made a thread literally calling someone out? If that's not rattling sabers... [/quote] Because Martens 2012 was meant to be tongue in cheek jab at a memorable moment of their/the lefts history.

[quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1336093753' post='2963186'] I've seen this one play out before. This isn't the time and the place to discuss why you didn't take a whole lot of damage in that war, but if you somehow believe you ended up on that side because of some scheme I implemented you are delusional. You had [b]3 bloc mates [/b]who unanimously were supporting that side. It wouldn't have mattered what I thought at the time you still would have been in the exact same position. Anyway, have fun with them TPF. [/quote] Two. LoSS didn't particularly care for defending Polaris due to obvious reasons.

[quote name='Alfred von Tirpitz' timestamp='1334635288' post='2954668'] There was other stuff as well, so it had been building up for a while. Add to that the talk about [b]MJ having no further use for RoK [/b]once the SF take-down was done... the dissatisfaction with those that had set the particular FA path was high. People just loved pointing out the fact that they "told you so" . [/quote] Ragnarok alienated every alliance in Mjolnir; Ragnarok made their bed in Mjolnir. There's a reason why Valhalla and Asgaard didn't ally RoK after Mjolnir.

[quote name='Sarmatian Empire' timestamp='1334594469' post='2954305'] no no no no no someone make this conversation stop. SOM for the love of admin be the bigger man that you are and stop arguing with these people. Man I thought we were over this !@#$ [/quote] The arguing should never stop. I might go 3 for 3 against RnR, I'm not sure how but it could happen. I missed out on nuking Ego last time D: Also from a LoSS point of view I still don't get how hunter had the authority to bring in DT since he was senate at the time iirc. Oh well I've got my casualties still :3

[quote name='Conred' timestamp='1331323223' post='2936036'] Thank you to all our supporters Quick notes: All active gov was in favor of us joining, An actual election (gasp, democracy) will take place one weve cleaned up a bit... Per the rules of our constitution. At that point, the people who run and are voted in will be rightful leaders... If WP is still in active at that point, he will not be able to retain power (cause he cant run). However we continue our previous statement and reaffirm that once he returns, we will glady follow all his requests. Im NOT gonna sit here and reason with people who are neither my allies or members of my alliance. When all members of the alliance approve, and all your allies are happy... There should be no further questions. Haters gonna hate. Just do it else where. All the rest of ya'll. Please stop by and chat, ask your questions at www.shadowaccord.co.cc Thanks yall [/quote] Yes because concerned members from a former ally (Asgaard) where questioning how this takeover was conducted are haters. Considering how you left are you surprised there are questions concerning this change in government.

I think it would help if you had the current government of TSA i.e. WorldPeace come in and say he was for this it would help stop the confusion about the 'hostile' takeover. [quote]The leaders of the Nephilim of Termina are acting against the constant threat of inactivity threatening to kill The Shadow Accord. So on behalf of our friends in TSA, and by the request of TSAs allies, we are returning. [/quote] This doesn't help either exposing your vanity like this. I propose Omni as the original founder still remaining returns and takes over TSA and rename it to TSC.

[quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1330036515' post='2927025'] Wow, this thread delivers. UE, are you serious with that policy? That's one of the most asinine things I've read recently. If a nation accepts aid marked for a tech deal, that nation has accepted a tech deal and is obligated to pay it, regardless of AA. This doesn't mean that the AA needs to guarantee the tech, but it does mean that the nation is held liable if it defaults. If you don't want your nations taking tech deals with AA's not on your white list, then tell them so. Then the refund policy... is math really that hard? You're going to waste slots sending back the 3m, so the buyer gets screwed out of slots and time, AND your membership gets screwed out of slots, time, and profit. Idiocy all around. MK ordered people to ghost Gre? (Gre hypocrisy regarding AA sovereignty aside) WTH were you smoking when you gave that order? How were you shocked that they were upset? [size="2"]..although i could see the old UPN thanking you for the stat bump, that's UPN, hardly the norm.[/size] [/quote] It's not asinine they're policy is nothing particularly new and if an aid slot is marked tech deal doesn't make it a contractual agreement unless it's verbal or PM in this case, as to only dealing with certain alliance that's nothing new and the benefits could be they have a tighter relationship with them and a possible treaty coming out of it or just preventing aiding future enemies/people they dislike. I'm also pretty certain they have told their nations on the AA they're just telling everyone else. There refund policy doesn't explicitly state they just send the money back but it's there choice if they're going to waste aid slots, people get squelched in tech deals all the time this is nothing new.

I refuse to congratulate you until you make your forums prettier.

I thought it was something to do with Omniscientone, I left disappointed. Good luck with your alliance, Hiro.

[quote name='commander thrawn' timestamp='1327914691' post='2910498'] The war didn't kill us. Lack of time and energy did. [/quote] Quite clearly Krack has discovered we were a Doomhouse puppet, luckily he has cottoned on that GOONS were the puppeteers.

It was a great ride for the almost-year I had with Asgaard it was a shame I didn't join sooner and maybe I wouldn't of been so burnt out and help the few still interested out. If only fishes were wishes I'll be eating trout in the halls of Asgaard. [quote name='Krack' timestamp='1327892396' post='2910022'] That doesn't surprise me at all; most alliances aspire to not exist anymore ten minutes after they "won" a war. [/quote] This was a last wake up call for the sleeping Asgardians unfortunately they hit the snooze button instead. Anyone who watched our war would of realized how badly hit we were from that other alternate reality that people spend so much time on.