potato

[quote name='Matt Miller' timestamp='1341944740' post='3007916'] Who is the ridiculous toolbag in that video? [/quote] Hyperion, iirc.

[quote name='Grendel' timestamp='1341879799' post='3007537'] you are potato He is Mr. Potato Head and well potato and Mr Potato Head are just as much alike as PITCHER and PICTURE are. So I think we'll keep using him. I'm quite sure you were not even close to being in anyone's mind when the whole Potato of Doom was thought up. [/quote] I'll let your head potato answer that one for me. [quote name='The Pansy' timestamp='1341896474' post='3007699'] Its not about your like for us, its our love for you [/quote] Do I get royalites, at least?

[quote name='The Pansy' timestamp='1341802635' post='3007037'] [img]http://i362.photobucket.com/albums/oo61/ThePansy/pansyswarflag.png[/img] This is currently the clear favourite [/quote] I'm not sure what you guys have with me, my name and my image but can you please stop? I don't like most of you.

[quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1341818581' post='3007174'] Those who don't want to end up stuck supporting MK could use who has a lot of votes on this as an indicator of who to first cut treaties with, as those with a lot of votes are either perceived as a MK tool for many reasons or the members of these alliances are voting their own alliances up since they're proud to be an MK tool. [/quote] A poll on the OWF is indeed a pretty good indicator of the reality of things.

[quote name='jerdge' timestamp='1341821987' post='3007183'] Counterpoint: Gopher, probably the only useful [s]player[/s] anything of the entire game. [/quote] *sigh* Read my other post before white-knighting Gopher (whom I respect and doesn't need you). It wasn't really meant as slight against MCXA. They just happened to be "there" when I needed an example of a not so active alliance (compared to Umbrella, Valhalla, MK, TOP...). Replace "MCXA" by any other alliance you like that fits the bill and get over it.

[quote name='Gopherbashi' timestamp='1341768452' post='3006747'] I don't get why my alliance is being dragged into this? [/quote] It was the first example off the top of my head of an alliance not exactly known for its activity. Replace "MCXA" by any mass alliance that has a slow response time if you prefer.

[quote name='Muddog' timestamp='1341743940' post='3006597'] Voted Umbrella, but is the relationship MK>Umb, or is Umb just a better puppet master than NPO was? [/quote] Does it really matter? We've explained our relationship at length in many different ways. But no matter what we say, you'll always find people like SCY who never had an independant thought in his life to project his own insecurities on us and our friends. At this point, it's better to just make fun of people like that.

[quote name='Nintenderek' timestamp='1341725734' post='3006504'] I've decided to become active again in the in the world [/quote] Look at what you did, Schattenmanhattanmanham!

[quote name='wickedj' timestamp='1341738564' post='3006590'] tbh alot of us are surprised there arent more on "anarchy inc" [/quote] Yeah. It may take a while for useless blobs like MCXA but, with active alliances such as Valhalla, Olympus and BAPS, I expect a better showing.

[img]http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/262/621/df3.png[/img] I'm flattered, guys. Thanks.

[quote name='King Wally' timestamp='1341377392' post='3003188'] I actually agree but the only way you will bring back conditions like that in SE mode would be if admin pulled a global reset and we got rid of all the max wonders and billion dollar warchests. Everyones had too many years to prep. Even a once off reset would restore some better war structures for the following couple years before the game would slowly start to get back to the realm of where it is now. You would also simplify the treaty web as many alliances would crack at the idea of restarting from scratch and you would see many NG style super mergers occur, inactive members wouldn't bother rerolling and you would be left with a much much smaller active core of members in far fewer AA's with fewer treatys. [/quote] Can you stop clamouring "Reset! Reset!" all the time? It's a dumb idea and won't change a single thing. The dynamics in this game come from the politics. Not from having huge warchest and a !@#$load of wonders. Do you actually think LSF and NoR will become best buddies? Do you actually think RIA and MK will see eye to eye? Do you actually think TOP and Polar will sign an MDAP? All this because we suddenly have tiny nations? Save from a bunch of people quitting and a (very rare) few others trying something new, the wars/politics/arguing will be the same except that all this will be done from 2K NS.

.

[quote name='Lord Cyvole' timestamp='1341068469' post='3000618'] There's actually a fair amount of them, but few left on good terms, and fewer still would want to associate with the POS that TGE became. [/quote] Repeating the same thing with different words doesn't answer my question.

[quote name='Alexander the 5th' timestamp='1341033929' post='3000441'] a lot of important people from this game came from TGE. [/quote] Like who?

Reminder that this is an OOC section: you guys can stop roleplaying a moronic leader.

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1340707737' post='2997090'] Real cut n paste or not its nice to have a list of some of MKs asshattery all in one place so we can remember their grubby past. [/quote] Coulda just asked us.

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1340540113' post='2994374'] You talk as if ODN had not attacked an uninvolved part because they have some kind of principle against it when we all know the only reason that OND or any other alliance didn't have attacked GOD yet is to avoid a treaty. [/quote] I'm not sure I get what you're trying to say here but ODN is attacking Sparta, an alliance that IS involved since they DoW'd MK.

Do the colours mean anything?

[quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1340135699' post='2989112'] Apparently Invicta, CSN and R&R. --- So basically for your entire war effort of your own doing. [/quote] We're just letting our friends get in on the tonking of your pathetic excuses of nations.

[quote name='Starfox101' timestamp='1340074459' post='2988176'] Not sure if aimed at me... [/quote] I do think you're out of touch these days but I wouldn't call you incompetent.

[quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1340075975' post='2988321'] However, he's also ironically in GOONS, an alliance that isn't at the time of his statement defending his ally in MK, so his statement is equally ironic if not more so. [/quote] Who do we need help for? [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1340080240' post='2988541'] Can you post a list with all alliances MK like/dislike? [/quote] We're so subtle d34th can't tell who we like and who we don't like.

You should have whispered louder into LSF's ear, Viking.

If that can help settle all this, both sides are dumb and annoying.

[quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1339973859' post='2986693'] It's not fun if there isn't any opposition. [/quote] *competent It's not fun if there isn't any competent opposition.

Welcome to the IRON Age.