519 Nigras Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Either way, you sure do carry around a lot of rage over not being allowed into TOP. Rage Co. buddy. There's a theme in there somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yates Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 No matter the course, TOP has been damned every time. Every. Single. Time. For years, the world has spat in our faces with "Do something about it." Sounds like a scenario I can identify with... Happy to have you as dance partners... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Nice attempt at revisionism, but TOP was called an NPO lapdog once so your sad attempt makes no sense. How does that make it not make sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 People like you are basically the reason we are so close to TOP. Idiots fail their Application process. So what, you tried to apply, failed, and decided that you'd go for the next best thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 So what, you tried to apply, failed, and decided that you'd go for the next best thing? I have to admit that made me lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I've also been here almost twice as long as you. You can tell because I have more stripes than you do. You have? No, no you actually haven't. You're still a liar, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 How does that make it not make sense? Generally, revisionism never makes sense because the revisionist prefers to only alter a part of history to fit his or her design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
519 Nigras Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 You have? No, no you actually haven't. You're still a liar, however. No I have, you're assuming this is my first nation as well. You're really bad at this which is funny given the amount of time and energy that you put into it. Truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Generally, revisionism never makes sense because the revisionist prefers to only alter a part of history to fit his or her design. You're still not saying how the picture doesn't make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Generally, revisionism never makes sense because the revisionist prefers to only alter a part of history to fit his or her design. This is where someone tells you that that propaganda went way over your head... and there we have it. That piece of propaganda isn't that hard to understand and doesn't not make sense. The fact that TOP was considered a NPO lapdog is completely irrelevant. The point is: IRON answered to NPO before, and now they are answering to TOP. See how uncomplicated that is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 No I have, you're assuming this is my first nation as well. You're really bad at this which is funny given the amount of time and energy that you put into it. Truth. You assume a lot, none of which is the truth however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 This is where someone tells you that that propaganda went way over your head... and there we have it. That piece of propaganda isn't that hard to understand and doesn't not make sense. The fact that TOP was considered a NPO lapdog is completely irrelevant. The point is: IRON answered to NPO before, and now they are answering to TOP. See how uncomplicated that is? In that case, the text in the image is incorrect. It seems that some things do change, according to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 In that case, the text in the image is incorrect. It seems that some things do change, according to you. Some things do change, but some other things never change. Only all or none statements exclude some statements from being true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I have to admit that made me lol. I aim to please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Now now now...The pot calling the kettle black! In that case, the text in the image is incorrect. It seems that some things do change, according to you. Please look at the image closely. Now please read what you closely. Unless you are seriously that dense, it should be fairly obvious, but I guess it needs to be spelled out so everyone can understand. On the left, you have a guy with the subtle NPO flag as his suit. He is talking down to a dog, which has the IRON flag as its pelt. In terms of chronology, things on the left are always considered to be past, whereas things to the right are either future-based or present-time. In that part, you see another man in a suit pointing down to the IRON dog, but instead of a NPO flag it is a TOP flag as his suit. What you could also interpret it as is that TOP helped take down NPO, so they technically opposed one another. So when one master fell, IRON went to a new master, TOP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Some-Guy Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 In that case, the text in the image is incorrect. It seems that some things do change, according to you. Dude, it's a propaganda image, not a mortgage application. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Dude, it's a propaganda image, not a mortgage application. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 So what, you tried to apply, failed, and decided that you'd go for the next best thing? That, my friends, is an . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 (edited) What you could also interpret it as is that TOP helped take down NPO, so they technically opposed one another. So when one master fell, IRON went to a new master, TOP. Seriously? That's what you're going for? Not only is it unoriginal, but it is terribly thought-out. Edited January 30, 2010 by Titus Pullo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 I fail to see how someone who is fighting the odds TOP is can be called cowards. The only reason they are fighting those odds because instead of waiting for the conflict to progress, they attacked out of the blue. If they would have stayed put they would have been fighting on the statistically stronger side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titus Pullo Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 The only reason they are fighting those odds because instead of waiting for the conflict to progress, they attacked out of the blue. If they would have stayed put they would have been fighting on the statistically stronger side. So by not staying put they in fact were not cowards, but if they had stayed put they would have been cowards for not participating in the war... This is what TOP members mean when they say that no matter what they do, everyone says they do it wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 Seriously? That's what you're going for? Not only is it unoriginal, but it is terribly thought-out. You really are that dense. It's propaganda, and it's not what I was going for, it's what the image says. Most propaganda is unoriginal, but that image was well thought-out since it goes over some peoples' heads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 So by not staying put they in fact were not cowards, but if they had stayed put they would have been cowards for not participating in the war... This is what TOP members mean when they say that no matter what they do, everyone says they do it wrong. No one would have called them cowards because they weren't really part of the conflict to begin with now were they? They didn't have a direct treaty to the original combatants. If anything they would have been called bandwagoners. Just like Blue Balls had nothing to do with TOP until they interjected themselves into it. The only way the NpO vs \m/ fiasco involved TOP is if TOP puts themselves in the line of fire. If anything it is piss poor positioning. Stop the persecution complex. You are better than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HellAngel Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 The only reason they are fighting those odds because instead of waiting for the conflict to progress, they attacked out of the blue. If they would have stayed put they would have been fighting on the statistically stronger side. What did you expect, you rejected our application!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted January 30, 2010 Report Share Posted January 30, 2010 So by not staying put they in fact were not cowards, but if they had stayed put they would have been cowards for not participating in the war... This is what TOP members mean when they say that no matter what they do, everyone says they do it wrong. You guys preemptively attacked an entire bloc that was not involved in the war. Guess what? If you guys had just declared in defense of IRON on Farkistan, you would have procured the same exact results, but you didn't, and you all look like idiots for doing so. We all knew CnG was going to be there for the counter, but you guys had an easy in to take on CnG, but instead you took the hard road. You deserve no sympathy for the odds you put yourselves in because you are the ones who declared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts