Rush Sykes Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Would you say that an alliance going against its own charter is more or less "against the political consensus of this world"? I ask only for information. In the end sir, it IS their charter to do with as they see fit. It is not Polars duty to enforce another alliances charter or their internal affairs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oinkoink12 Posted January 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 That sums it up a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balkan Banania Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 I had the impression that the community reproves all high-handed acts and it was the main reason behind the Karma war. It seems it was not the case. After the war we see alliances like Athens and \m/ acting irresponsibly, abusing the power of their blocs by imposing their morals and views on smaller alliances. NpO did the right thing from my point of view, thus I wish them luck. Also I suppose most of the DOWs are not the result of peoples agreement with \m/ actions, but an opportunity for alliances to pursuit their agenda, as usual . Has anyone bothered to click on our flag yet ? I did and I want some details of the nature of the video , if possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druss the Legend Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Hail FOK o/ Epic blitz, It'll be an honor anarchying some Polar's with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 \m/ acting irresponsibly, abusing the power of their blocs by imposing their morals and views on smaller alliances. Acting irresponsibly? Yeh probably. The rest of the things you said? Complete nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathias Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 So you chose to escelate a war that would have otherwise have stayed contained. in the end its your funeral so w/w floats your boat I guess So you chose to escalate a conflict that would have otherwise stayed resolved? How can you even pretend FOK is the one being unreasonable here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balkan Banania Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Acting irresponsibly? Yeh probably. The rest of the things you said? Complete nonsense. So you support that there is no abuse of power involved in the recent incidences? I disagree, but as usual where people stand is a matter of perspective and for the ones involved a matter of politics as well. Thus let’s agree that we disagree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolissar Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 So you chose to escalate a conflict that would have otherwise stayed resolved? How can you even pretend FOK is the one being unreasonable here? Why does it always take so long for somebody to state the obvious around here? Not that anybody will do anything but ignore this factual tidbit, but I hear if you quote something enough it might just become true, so here goes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoFish Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Would you say that an alliance going against its own charter is more or less "against the political consensus of this world"? I ask only for information. When an alliance violates its charter, the only harm being done is to its own members. Just try to tell me you're doing this for the sake of \m/'s members. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Divi Filius Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 (edited) (...) I did and I want some details of the nature of the video , if possible. What you see is our president, Uncle Harry, performing the FOK wardance. This is a ritual we always have when going to battle. In the background you see some other prominent members of FOK. I feel the need to point out that ikMark is the pink one with the flower. [OOC] I'm not completely sure, but I think it's from a tv show for kids on a Belgian channel [/OOC] Edited January 25, 2010 by Divi Filius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erikz Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 I did and I want some details of the nature of the video , if possible. OOC: It's from "Yo Gabba Gabba", with Jack Black doing that little dance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 When an alliance violates its charter, the only harm being done is to its own members. Just try to tell me you're doing this for the sake of \m/'s members. I hated you already, but I am seriously starting to think I should be pitying you instead. Logic and you are strangers aren't they. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 (edited) When an alliance violates its charter, the only harm being done is to its own members. Just try to tell me you're doing this for the sake of \m/'s members. Seems you're forgetting about FoA here. You know, that little 33-man alliance that wouldn't have been attacked for no reason had \m/ followed its charter. Edited January 25, 2010 by Rebel Virginia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 You have decided to back up the most outrageous of raiders, supporting a terrible precedent that the global community is second to optional treaty ties and ensured that many more alliances will be pressured into fighting for said terrible precedent. You should be ashamed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderJerusalem Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 You have decided to back up the most outrageous of raiders, supporting a terrible precedent that the global community is second to optional treaty ties and ensured that many more alliances will be pressured into fighting for said terrible precedent. You should be ashamed. I think I'll hold on to this little gem. You know, for later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 For when I have an epiphany and become in favour of raiding 30 member alliances? Sure, hang on to it, you've got a long wait Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderJerusalem Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 For when I have an epiphany and become in favour of raiding 30 member alliances? Sure, hang on to it, you've got a long wait You'll see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balkan Banania Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 You'll see I suppose you have some inside info concerning the upcoming DOWs? Also thanks to FOKers for the info concerning the video, of course your kindness do not change my stance on the matter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzptm Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 \m/ does not deserve this support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan King Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 /me hopes NpO has their stool and whip. It's time to tame the lion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Good Luck FOK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mwanatabu Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 \m/ does not deserve this support. PC does. But you knew that, dintcha? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawnNL Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 o/ FOK NpO acting like worldpolice, fail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas Longhorn Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 o/ FOK NpO acting like worldpolice, fail o/ FOK, supporting the raiding of small alliances, how far you have fallen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erikz Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 o/ FOK, supporting the raiding of small alliances, how far you have fallen. Call it whatever you want. I see it as standing with my allies. We waited for a while to see if peace could be reached, but it clearly couldn't. Thats when we tried to make this an even-sided conflict. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.