SpacingOutMan Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Not even close.Hell man, they even admit that in the OP. What they're claiming without being man enough to actually claim it is that they think Hoo was in on it. They're playing a dashing good game of Ring Around the Rosie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raunchero Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Well this is an interesting development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 I'm not the one who is grand standing like a *&^(*&^( here now am I? If you're going to pull this kind of stunt, at least have the audacity to go through with it instead of relying on some technicality. "Oh, we would declare, but it's a holiday, so we aren't. But you know, you did something bad, so tsk tsk." Yea, definitely takes a pair to make that kind of statement. EDIT: Why isn't that word filtered? Yes, because ruining people real lives for something like this is totally worth it. Pixels are important! Also, you see, we give them chances to do something about it, something RoK/Athens never did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasin Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 This is the best CB I have seen in a long, long time. Strangely, its not in the form of a CB (yet) It's so peculiar, isn't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Yes, because ruining people real lives for something like this is totally worth it. Pixels are important!Also, you see, we give them chances to do something about it, something RoK/Athens never did. Then why bring this up today if you don't want people to worry about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Hassan Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 All I can say is that Wolfpack was dogpiled for much less that that during the Puppy War. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 He was a high level advisor in the top levels of government. Not only can you not prove that because you lack any sort of evidence, you can't prove that he was doing this for anything but !@#$s and giggles. In fact you can't prove much of anything except that some guy who apparently got deleted for multis had multis. Wow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 (edited) Yes, because ruining people real lives for something like this is totally worth it. Pixels are important!Also, you see, we give them chances to do something about it, something RoK/Athens never did. *SpacingOutMan shrugs As is the way when everyone is home from school, etc. etc. In all honesty, a good ol' drunken war would have been a lot of fun. And honestly, if your life gets ruined by a game, I pity anyone who takes it that seriously. Good for you? Here, take a cookie. I never condoned what RoK and Athens did, so perhaps I can say my hands are clean, but still, take the cookie. It's sugar too! Then why bring this up today if you don't want people to worry about it? That too. Edited December 31, 2009 by SpacingOutMan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 (edited) So what alliance was President Magee in when Rish was in gov? Cause whatever alliance that was, they have a CB in 6 months time. I suggest you all look in your past to see if President Magee was ever a member of your alliance. If ROK denies the legitimacy of this CB by whoever that alliance is, they are hypocrites. Would ROK agree that whatever alliance President Magee was in while Rish was a triumvir has a acceptable CB on them? Edited December 31, 2009 by Kaiser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deth2munkies Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Yes, because ruining people real lives for something like this is totally worth it. Pixels are important!Also, you see, we give them chances to do something about it, something RoK/Athens never did. Chances to do what, apologize? Hoo did that 10 posts ago. Now what? Punish a banned member? Nuke themselves? Jump on their swords for something that leadership didn't even know about or order (recall that regardless of what you think of the TPF conflict, mhawk was not only aware, but ordered the...whatever the hell they're claiming now). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Then why bring this up today if you don't want people to worry about it? Read the second line of the post of mine you quoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 No, Rishnokof was not in RoK when he chose to go on his crazy rogue excursions. High profile rogues come along every now and then and most people do not associate their actions with their former alliances. Yes he was. He was a top adviser to Hoo at the time, in fact. Top level access. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mussolandia Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 No, Rishnokof was not in RoK when he chose to go on his crazy rogue excursions. High profile rogues come along every now and then and most people do not associate their actions with their former alliances. He was not a Triumvir anymore, but he was pretty much in the loop, like I am. The comparison is valid. The difference in behavior is too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 You see now I am wondering whether to believe hoo about his logs. Really bad show Rok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 So what alliance was President Magee in when Rish was in gov? Cause whatever alliance that was, they have a CB in 6 months time. I suggest you all look in your past to see if President Magee was ever a member of your alliance. This is what I'm interested in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 He was not a Triumvir anymore, but he was pretty much in the loop, like I am. The comparison is valid. The difference in behavior is too. So if I spied on someone, that means CSN government immediately did it? Sir, your logic sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 He was a high level advisor in the top levels of government. Not that I expect you to actually be anything other than disingenuous given your performance these last few days. I'm pretty sure the arguments that I quoted was calling the guy a government member, which he wasn't. Advisor isn't a government member. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorbolt Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Khyber isn't even a current TOP nation, so I dunno how the hell you're arguing this point with any sort of straight face. This guy was a former Triumvir and advisor who had a multi in another alliance. That's spying from someone who has a high position in most people's books. I was portraying how Mussolandia's argument that Rishnokof's actions spoke for RoK because he WAS a Trium as equivalent to saying that Khyber's, as former TOP leader, actions spoke for TOP. Rishnokof was not even a current RoK nation either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 (edited) Not only can you not prove that because you lack any sort of evidence, you can't prove that he was doing this for anything but !@#$s and giggles. In fact you can't prove much of anything except that some guy who apparently got deleted for multis had multis. Wow! They can prove, and have proved, that a top level advisor and former triumvir of Ragnarok had membership access or attempted to have membership access in at least three different alliances while being in Ragnarok. edit - also the whole "instigating a fight between NSO and TOP" thing Edited December 31, 2009 by Heft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 So if I spied on someone, that means CSN government immediately did it? Sir, your logic sucks. Only if you are an advisor. Reading. It helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Read the second line of the post of mine you quoted. So why not wait a day, instead of post a thread that will receive NUMEROUS replies? Don't be stupid. I know you're a smart guy. No matter what, time on this holiday will be wasted due to this thread, war or not. If they cared, they wouldn't have posted it today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Is there any evidence that suggests that he had a multi while he was in gov? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 You see now I am wondering whether to believe hoo about his logs. Really bad show Rok. Yes, I can see how Hoo apologising for a spy that he was totally unaware of makes his word less valuable. What a worm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 So why not wait a day, instead of post a thread that will receive NUMEROUS replies? Wait a day for what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 I'm pretty sure the arguments that I quoted was calling the guy a government member, which he wasn't. Advisor isn't a government member. And your argument was disingenuous as it ignored the influence and access he did have in exchange for tunnel-visioning in on one meaningless little factoid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts