Jump to content

Ragnarok Announcement


Van Hoo III

Recommended Posts

I never said I didn't support or won't defend mhawk. Quite the contrary actually, I think mhawk is a great leader.

You can't both support him as a leader and at the same time claim you shouldn't have to take responsibility for the action he takes for your alliance.

Either you support him or not, you apparently do wich is great but it's not athens or anyone else responsibility what your leader does. Ultimately it falls down on TPF as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 661
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeh, because I think he is lying.

Exactly. It will likely be your new rallying cry now that the CB has been played to death and more or less, universally accepted. From a tactical point, it makes sense. From a motive point, it makes sense. Which calls the logs into question even more so, in an intelligent mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't both support him as a leader and at the same time claim you shouldn't have to take responsibility for the action he takes for your alliance.

Either you support him or not, you apparently do wich is great but it's not athens or anyone else responsibility what your leader does. Ultimately it falls down on TPF as a whole.

What about this new lovy dovy era of peace and understanding the karma war was supposed to bring in. Guess that all was a lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. It will likely be your new rallying cry now that the CB has been played to death and more or less, universally accepted. From a tactical point, it makes sense. From a motive point, it makes sense. Which calls the logs into question even more so, in an intelligent mind.

"Intelligent mind" key word. Hiya Flinders, how are ya?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about this new lovy dovy era of peace and understanding the karma war was supposed to bring in. Guess that all was a lie.

First of all I don't remember anyone promising that.

Second, what does that have to do with not wanting to take responsibility for the actions of your leader?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all I don't remember anyone promising that.

Second, what does that have to do with not wanting to take responsibility for the actions of your leader?

There is a difference between not wanting to and not willing to. I don't want to get rolled because your buddies thought some bs was a valid cb, but I will get rolled if I need to, because I support my leader. Don't question my loyalty you chump, I was zied in the KARMA was like pretty much everyone else in TPF.

Edited by jimbacher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have the time, or effort, to read 16 pages, so If someone has asked this already, I apologize.

Is there a reason, that even when you subtract the two hours, the timestamps don't match up?

And has either of them provided proof that the other doctored the logs, other than their word?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between not wanting to and not willing to. I don't want to get rolled because your buddies thought some bs was a valid cb, but I will get rolled if I need to, because I support my leader. Don't question my loyalty you chump, I was zied in the KARMA was like pretty much everyone else in TPF.

I don't doubt your loyalty to TPF. You did claim that the general membership shouldn't get punished for what your leader did though. The way I see it as long as you stay in your alliance you're responsible for the actions of your leader, wether you want to or not.

I don't have the time, or effort, to read 16 pages, so If someone has asked this already, I apologize.

Is there a reason, that even when you subtract the two hours, the timestamps don't match up?

And has either of them provided proof that the other doctored the logs, other than their word?

No proof either way has been given by either side. The whole discussion has pretty much been about the burden of proof (wich both sides naturally claims is on the other side).

Edited by neneko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Intelligent mind" key word. Hiya Flinders, how are ya?

All my words are key words !@#$%^. I'm having a grand old time. Can't you tell! It's like the NoV war all over again but people are actually listening to me this time.

*edit

The "b" word with an "a" thrown in there is filtered? Lame.

Edited by Captain Flinders
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have the time, or effort, to read 16 pages, so If someone has asked this already, I apologize.

Is there a reason, that even when you subtract the two hours, the timestamps don't match up?

And has either of them provided proof that the other doctored the logs, other than their word?

prob is a reason, but then that comes down to who you believe altered the logs. Each side is going to believe their guy is the trustworty one.

Given the number of Edited/altered logs surfacing these days, who knows what is real and what is fake. :lol1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In an earlier Conversation between Hoo and Warbuck, he stated something to the effect of; you better get off of aqua, you have no friends here."

To me it is not too farfetched that he went a little bit further in telling people they need to leave the game. Combine that with being emotionally unstable and cocky, I think it is very likely that line is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

prob is a reason, but then that comes down to who you believe altered the logs. Each side is going to believe their guy is the trustworty one.

Given the number of Edited/altered logs surfacing these days, who knows what is real and what is fake. :lol1:

...Did this serously become 16 pages over a basic no u match of who has a more trustworthy player?

There seems to be equal proof on either side, and unless new conversations and amazing screenshots of admissions pop up, I don't think we'll have a change.

I figured there had to be something else hidden in these pages somewhere ._.

Edited by Shurukian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between not wanting to and not willing to. I don't want to get rolled because your buddies thought some bs was a valid cb, but I will get rolled if I need to, because I support my leader. Don't question my loyalty you chump, I was zied in the KARMA was like pretty much everyone else in TPF.

you need to get rolled. :awesome:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Did this serously become 16 pages over a basic no u match of who has a more trustworthy player?

There seems to be equal proof on either side, and unless new conversations and amazing screenshots of admissions pop up, I don't think we'll have a change.

I figured there had to be something else hidden in these pages somewhere ._.

There is something hidden in here...do you feel it taking over your mind???

:ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have the time, or effort, to read 16 pages, so If someone has asked this already, I apologize.

Is there a reason, that even when you subtract the two hours, the timestamps don't match up?

And has either of them provided proof that the other doctored the logs, other than their word?

Not everybody has their clocks synced up. Unless you sync them regularly (at least weekly) they can start to run a few minutes away from each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...