Jump to content

jimbacher

Members
  • Posts

    131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.phoenix-federation.net
  • ICQ
    0

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Jimbacher
  • Alliance Name
    The Phoenix Federation
  • Resource 1
    Lumber
  • Resource 2
    Wheat

jimbacher's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. [quote name='Banksy' date='10 June 2010 - 06:26 PM' timestamp='1276208751' post='2332211'] You're not great with the whole "reading comprehension" thing, are you? If an ODNer would refuse to back BAPS, and would only back UPN then, regardless of who wins the war, we could not 'pick' the winning side as we would always pick UPN, [b]win or lose[/b]. [/quote] Perhaps I failed English, but you apparently have failed history.
  2. [quote name='Hakim' date='10 June 2010 - 06:20 PM' timestamp='1276208436' post='2332200'] UPN would have actually had to fight in order to put 1 nation into anarchy in the last war...which is, I believe, your subtle point. o/ BAPS you guys rock...[img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img] [/quote] Not true, you can put your own nation into anarchy...
  3. [quote name='Banksy' date='10 June 2010 - 06:16 PM' timestamp='1276208180' post='2332193'] Shot bro. He was brining up the point that there is no way an ODNer would back BAPS ~ [/quote] and my original statement was that ODN would back the winning side...so apparently ODN thinks BAPS would win. Hence I lulz at you for thinking your ally will lose.
  4. [quote name='joracy' date='10 June 2010 - 06:09 PM' timestamp='1276207770' post='2332181'] Oh ho ho, funny man. Somehow I doubt any ODN nations would be interested in getting near BAPS, or BAPS would be interested in welcoming ODN nations. [/quote] UPN & ODN| The Treaty of Valencia |Mutual Defense and Optional Aggression Pact | Active
  5. [quote name='Banksy' date='10 June 2010 - 06:04 PM' timestamp='1276207433' post='2332167'] This will end well But who will we all ghost? :iiam: [/quote] I assume the winning side?
  6. Hey BAPS, can you get rid of the no ghosting clause?
  7. Matthew I hope you guys are willing to unconditionally surrender to IRON/DAWN, because that would be the only appropriate punishment for you guys at this point.
  8. [quote name='Bilrow' date='10 May 2010 - 09:44 PM' timestamp='1273542259' post='2294274'] Yay Radio Silence. [/quote] ehhm....Bilrow....(inside joke)
  9. [quote name='Seth Muscarella' date='06 May 2010 - 10:56 PM' timestamp='1273200949' post='2289670'] I see not even the great NPO has taught you to read or write. Weren't you an officer in our military when we attacked Pacifica? If I remember right, you didn't have a problem until we focused our attacks inward for a member purge. [/quote] Let me guess the questionaire included the following: If we have a choice between backstabbing or not backstabbing? A) Backstab B) Not backstab I see Seth answered that question correctly from his alliance's perspective.
  10. [quote name='alyster' date='06 May 2010 - 10:29 PM' timestamp='1273199352' post='2289620'] Says our long time ally and suporter I wonder how big the reps for you have to be compared to IRON Edit: I also wonder who's the next alliance you backstab? [/quote] I don't think you really want an answer to that question do you?
  11. I think IRON/DAWN should demand an unconditional surrender from grem.
  12. [quote name='Ashoka the Great' date='04 May 2010 - 12:11 PM' timestamp='1272989460' post='2286446'] I was just "NoU'd" by the Imperator Emeritus of the New Pacific Order. I can now die in peace, my mission complete. [/quote] Heil, Well then at least I can one up you by getting kick-banned by Moo (and let us not forget mary <3). I personally hope to see some tech from NPO. I heard there former allies are entitled to some of the interest generated by the K.A.R.M.A. war bonds.
  13. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='02 May 2010 - 10:33 AM' timestamp='1272810766' post='2283746'] Yeah, diverting reparations to MK is perfectly legitimate as per the terms, and you have purposely misinterpreted something Londo said previously to make it seem as if he's changed his stance. [/quote] To think that Londo's stance on anything has been consistent over time would require you to ingest some drug that reacts to lunacy. I believe that NPO requires the right to complain about the harshest terms ever given because one can only take so much bull-crap from the opposition before insanity onsets. Think about it this way, if NPO forgoes lamenting over this stuff now, the G15 may have to suffer when Moo coups Cortath. Moo would force war later upon the G15 later, stemming from the onset of Mad Cow Disease. The end result of this war could cause Londo to go insane from the long lasting radiative side effects, which may actually bring him closer to being normal after all.
  14. Happy birthday my little orange friends.
×
×
  • Create New...